I think MOST is a stretch. Some, yes.
Oh well how many have posted IGF levels? A LOT fewer than MOST unfortunately.
An similar situation occurred when people were asked to post TT levels after I conducted testosterone levels on samples that were submitted.
(Again info data would have HELPED evaluate the usefulness of the 10X rule and the data I had posted)
Sorry friend but MOST in this forum have committed nothing more than LIP SERVICE, and a few posts, to the notion of community.
This becomes even more obvious when that definition is associated with direct personal involvement or financial expenditure.
The fact is prior to this thread I had offered GH testing to ANYONE who would first submit their baseline IGF level and another one 4-6 weeks after the analysis was conducted. The proviso, no data would be revealed until the 4-6 week level was returned to me.
Quests how many even submitted samples ZIPPO, ZILTCH, ZERO!
That's the reason MANDS and I changed the requirement to forwarding IGF levels after the analyses were revealed, and we still got ZIPPO, ZILTCH, ZERO IGF data, lol!
It's all for the better really bc at least now I KNOW what to expect from the majority, NOT MUCH.