4leafclover
New Member
No, what I meant by transparency is what Millard has been talking about, getting the AAS community as a whole (not just meso) to recognize the results as legitimate. This is mostly to avoid what happened to Myth. So by transparency, I was talking more about on our end, for instance who is in charge of getting the tests done, how many samples are sent in, who is responsible for getting the samples from the UGL's etc.
Some of the critiques of Myth have been that he (these are not true from what I can tell, just slander against him, so I am not condoning these messages) had a hidden agenda, that he possibly tainted the results, that he wanted to shut other labs down so he could get kickbacks from a certain lab on Meso, etc. If we have transparency, we can point to how we went about our process, and hopefully we can minimize the backlash against those who do carry out the research for us (not the actual lab, but our members), so they aren't attacked much like the publisher of Anabolic's Underground was for his research done on UGL's.
Some of the critiques of Myth have been that he (these are not true from what I can tell, just slander against him, so I am not condoning these messages) had a hidden agenda, that he possibly tainted the results, that he wanted to shut other labs down so he could get kickbacks from a certain lab on Meso, etc. If we have transparency, we can point to how we went about our process, and hopefully we can minimize the backlash against those who do carry out the research for us (not the actual lab, but our members), so they aren't attacked much like the publisher of Anabolic's Underground was for his research done on UGL's.