Mass Spec Thread

No, I have been having problems with many features other than this as well (e.g. conversations). I get a relatively useless error when attempting to view the attachment.

Ample i was getting the same error as well. It seems we need cliff notes of the tests if we can't read the pdf files. I was wondering how HTP test C tested out. We can labmax until we get blue in the face, but the result is binary.

Can you please help me out and post in the following thread - with as much detail as possible - all of the problems you are experiencing with the forum?

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/official-bug-thread-for-new-meso-forum.134355933/

To address a couple of issues mentioned here...

(1) I think the attachment UPLOAD issue has been fixed. Please let me know if this is not the case?

(2) Viewing PDFs and other attachments submitted prior to June 5th is temporarily unavailable. We need to re-import these attachments from a file back up. I do not have a date of completion for this but I hope it is very soon.
 
Myth so if it says it is 85% purity and 100mg is sufficient does that mean there is 85mg/ml?
 
No the 85% refers to the purity of the powder (fillers)...."100mg is sufficient" refers to the each ml having 100mg of hormone in it...Although the hormone is only 85% pure
 
Myth - I know it has been stated previously, but I'll say it again - thanks for doing this for the community! I feel like, as a community, we keep evolving into more educated and more responsible participants in this game. The changes and improvements I have seen over the last year are really exciting. From us demanding more from the sources, to labmax to more frequent mass specs, we are stronger as a community. Thanks for playing a role in this, Myth!
 
Also, I'm an engineer so numbers are my thing, maybe some one could explain it a little better if I'm not making much sense to anyone...
 
Myth - I know it has been stated previously, but I'll say it again - thanks for doing this for the community! I feel like, as a community, we keep evolving into more educated and more responsible participants in this game. The changes and improvements I have seen over the last year are really exciting. From us demanding more from the sources, to labmax to more frequent mass specs, we are stronger as a community. Thanks for playing a role in this, Myth!

Just trying to help where I can, still looking into bigger and better options for the MESO community as a whole...

Thank you for the kind words...

-Myth-
 
Im fairly new on this forum so pardon if this has been covered but along with mass specs, has anyone done any heavy metal testing?
 
Im fairly new on this forum so pardon if this has been covered but along with mass specs, has anyone done any heavy metal testing?
According to Patrick Arnold, heavy metals are not a concern. He posted in his section on phf about it.
 
According to Patrick Arnold, heavy metals are not a concern. He posted in his section on phf about it.

I did read his post on that. Assuming the processes are the same and there is no contamination going on in a chinese factory, then yes. From what Ive seen >85% purity seems to be pretty good as far as raws. Just hoping heavy metals arent a part of that other ~15%
 
will the ester have anything to do with the purity. Such as prop have more test per ml then e?
 
By doing this you are not only helping out me so but the entire bodybuilding industry move in a positive direction it was and getting way out of hand .... This is a dangerous and greedy world we live in ... By running these tests regularly we will expose the trash suppliers and they will be forced to only supply quality products ......
 
Back
Top