Mass Spec Thread

Yes more then one mass spec and more then one person who REALLY knows how to read them. Problem being why is all the expense put on us?
 
This is why a third party lab over sees would be invaluable to the community. I understand mass specs pretty good and I still get confused as hell. For the average user who has no chemical/engineering background these things are like Chinese.

What I would love to see is a test like the old srsc that looked like this
BD-Stanabol.jpg


No guessing, just straight facts.would be huge for us, plus people could call and confirm the results so no sources trying to discredit shit.
 
You know what, that's fine. But just like a business will pass on the cost of doing business to the customer, it can go both ways.
 
Im sorry I have kind of tuned out of this thread for a couple weeks. Are we still without an option for Mass Spec since mythotik stopped or did that change?
 
I'm on an emotional roller coaster here. I see the thread I got excited and joined the site, I post because I want to test products and bam!!! I think it's not happening and now I'm hooray!!! There is still a possibility.
 
Something doesn't make sense, if LS was on 605mg of test (he said he was dosing 750, and if it was 202 per ML), why did his bloods come back so poor? He should of at least been a lot closer to 6k vs 1900 if the opposite were true.
 
I hope some one gets this to happen. My bloods came back great but I really want to know if their is any contaminants in the raws. The reviews i have been given have been amazing. Ok my ambien is staking oven i will have the. He jnnnnnn
 
This is why a third party lab over sees would be invaluable to the community. I understand mass specs pretty good and I still get confused as hell. For the average user who has no chemical/engineering background these things are like Chinese.

What I would love to see is a test like the old srsc that looked like this
BD-Stanabol.jpg


No guessing, just straight facts.would be huge for us, plus people could call and confirm the results so no sources trying to discredit shit.

A summary isn't good enough. I want to see the data, the analysis AND the summary. No way would I pay for just a summary. After the absurd arguments on what Angus' reports mean, no way would I pay for his tests either. A reasonably intelligent person should be able to look at the data, perform the required computations and arrive at the same answers.
 
Well on the srcs reports the pages after that included all the data. But the first page was simple and to the point.
 
Back
Top