master.on
New Member
ExactlyI always knew that. He is just getting paid to do a bogus test paid by a bunch of sore VIPs who not only sell GH on their VIP rooms but also recs and meds, I already know it and these guys wouldn't even believe one of their own told me.
Google can help you find like a dozen GH methods in 5 minutesBut you are not my colleague, customer, person with genuine interest or anybody who could have any useful input on that. Enough said.
but I want to know what test are YOU using.
Jano has been exposed as fraud, yet again.What’s going on with this thread?
Wtf is going on in here....
Anyone else confused?
BullshitYes I completely understand that the cost is your time, I've never suggested otherwise.
Just like it took me hundreds if not thousands of hours to educate myself, perfect the methods, just like it takes hours to answer all the emails to the customers. Just like it takes time to run the analyses and evaluate the results.
the competition among HPLC manufacturers is so fierce, and prices have dropped so low (some even below $30k for manual inject systems)
That manufacturers will spend about a week to teach HPLC "basics" to customers.
That "basic training" can get customers well versed, unless they're total morons.
Then customers can find methods online and begin testing.
The big hurdle is equipment PRICE, not as much skill.
Do you even own an HPLC machine?
100% agree.NOTHING
From these graphs alone one may conclude a single compound was injected into a chemical separator machine.
There is NO way to know if that compound was HGH or it's concentration based upon this info alone!
And BTW an Amino Acid Assay (which is similar to and uses HPLC technology) can help verify a labs veracity bc it's one of the few analytical assays in use today that does quantify and qualify the number and characteristics of the amino acids present in a sample.
Add the numbers and proportions of AA up and you should have HGH, in a specific concentration.
The chart doesn't really say anything.
Especially suspicious considering @janoshik refuses to disclose his testing method, when they can be found online for free.
Right on the nail.Wait I'm not saying nor can I conclude the result is bogus IDK, but from a historical perspective, Ive learned some folk can't be trusted and Jano is one of them IMO.
And since HGH is an uncontrolled substance there's really no need for clandestine testing such as that which Jano is offering.
GH ain't controlled so why so much secrecy?
Jano failure to disclose his methods leaves you wondering if he actually has an HPLC machine.What the fuck do you mean "verify the labs' veracity?"
That means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Hey dipshit, know what verifies a lab's abilities? It's called a Level IV data validation.
You said you had standards. If you were so gung-ho to prove Jano wrong, WHY didn't you send them in blind?
Why do you talk shit? Your AAA was a good start, but it was no more than screening- level data. Good screening level data though.
You remind me of the some of tge PhDs who I deal with. They use big words and spew jargon to impress. The salty dogs in the room know they are full of shit.