I dont think most would say it is as potent as Test/tren/deca for growth.
I would say 200mg of mast is nothing like 200mg of tren or deca.
It would be hard to say that 200mg of Deca would generate more growth than 800mg of mast.
I for damn sure know that 250mg of tren fucks up my labs more than 600mg of mast.
The thing is...
Its about if it can be used as a growth promoter. from old forums, people used to talk mad shit about primo saying it was useless unless it was 600mg. wtf changed?
People have different preferences on different anabolics, some people like test solo and do well off of it, some people dont like the water retention. Maybe Deca breaks one guys dick and tren doesnt, vice versa.
This was mainly supposed to be a discussion to review one of the many compounds that can be utilized in a cycle build. Masteron does have a better safety profile than some of the other anabolics.
I am contemplating running 300 test and and 800 mast for my next cycle now because of this discussion to prove a point.
Oh I agree on all points. I’m just saying like 5-7 years ago, mast was almost exclusively viewed as a hardened to go with tren/EQ as a contest prep drug. You would of been made fun of to run a growth phase with moderate test high mast.
I really enjoy mast. I’ve never ventured past 400mg a week, but it will be quite interesting to see you run it high as the anchor.