Probably notMaybe it all gets excreted somehow before even making it to the liver in medical patients.
What was your life like at the time?i wish i could take anadrol but even if it made me gain 100lbs on bench every week, wouldnt be worth it the way i felt.
I think that’s a really good point. There is something of a countervailing consideration, however, which is that there are compounds that can get you to the same place with a lower risk if you’re willing to be more patient.Ok so in the past I’ve argued that we are way too weird about anadrol in particular. Moreso Reddit but just as a generality. They talk like 25mg anadrol for 4wks will give instant liver failure, when medical literature cites that one can generally take doses far higher and longer than that used by our community with negligible side effects.
The other half of looking at medicinal uses is that this is a game of risk:reward. An AIDS patient (as a random, but common example) will have a different risk:reward profile than a healthy bodybuilder. If they don’t receive this (or whatever) medicine they may die, thus it’s favorable for them to take the medicine even if it damages systems of their body. With us though we aren’t risking death or organ failure if we don’t use anabolics, so 0mg is the optimal dosage and the further above that the worse you’re hurting your body.
i was also taking test and deca. just felt like i couldnt eat and weak felt like shit, went away as soon as i stopped taking anadrol. took milk thistle nac and tudca too.What was your life like at the time?
Man idk how it never slows my eating like other people, my liver must be a beast, I'm on 100mg pharma drol and 20mg 3rd world pharma sdrol right now and I wish my appetite wasn't so insane, I'm averaging almost exactly 5kcalories a day over the last 3.5 weeks at 217lbs, it's supposed to be 4500 but I fucked up twice and had an 8kcalorie day, plus going slightly over a lot of days. I eat pretty damn clean except for the fuckup moments and my Mrs. Buttersworth syrup in my preworkoutnmeal. High fructose corn syrup is bomb af, I tried some Log cabin syrup with no high fructose corn syrup amd it sucks ass. How well were you hydrating?i was also taking test and deca. just felt like i couldnt eat and weak felt like shit, went away as soon as i stopped taking anadrol. took milk thistle nac and tudca too.
So I’m considering running the higher end of my recommended medical dosage for my weight, I’ve never gone over 250MG anadrol a day but with the higher end of medical dosage being 5MG/KG of bodyweight a day I think I’m going to throw 650MG Anadrol a day to start my next cycle, anyway my question being, I always liked my orals pre workout but will 650MG be too much all in one go ? Should I split the dosage up ?
Cheers for the advice in advance
You’re confusing oxandrolone and oxymethelone. Oxandrin in anavar“Oxandrin is available in 2.5 and 10 mg tablets. The daily adult dosage of Oxandrin is 2.5 mg to 20 mg given in 2 to 4 divided doses.”
My mistake. I searched for Oxymetholone and Google decided I meant otherwise. I should have checked my results.You’re confusing oxandrolone and oxymethelone. Oxandrin in anavar
This is what I was wondering. With pharmaceuticals, there is always an upper limit - do not exceed this dosage - regardless of what the therapeutic indication in amount/kg?150 mg/d as an upper limit
Dosage is a bit of a malleable, contextual concept. While dosage relative to body mass is useful, it is unidimensional and can suffer from misapplication at its extremes (e.g., anemic female children vs. poly-AAS using superheavyweight male IFBB pros). Here are my notes on oxymetholone dosage, from various sources:This is what I was wondering. With pharmaceuticals, there is always an upper limit - do not exceed this dosage - regardless of what the therapeutic indication in amount/kg?
Exactly right. Now, on a certain BB forum that promotes very high dosing, there is a popular thread making the case for 500 mg/d oxymetholone because there is an instance of superheavyweight, international strongman competitor that is reputed to have reported using this dose in a private communication to a particular, high dose advocating influencer there.At any rate, as long as i can remember, bodybuilders always thought that even the upper limit of 150mg/d was crazy and dangerous.
Something else worth noting is that there is big difference in safety profile of a cycle of 150mg/d of Anadrol vs. 150mg/d Anadrol + AAS #2 + AAS #3 stacks that are more typical of bodybuilding use.
guess hydrate well enough, no other orals did this, i love mixing dbol and winstrol that comes with other issues but nothing serious, winstrol can make you feel very angry suicidal. i did 50mg of dbol for last few days without winstrol but it was making my stomach feel weird, like id feel very full then 30mins later id be starving. everything went back to normal a day or 2 after stopping orals.Man idk how it never slows my eating like other people, my liver must be a beast, I'm on 100mg pharma drol and 20mg 3rd world pharma sdrol right now and I wish my appetite wasn't so insane, I'm averaging almost exactly 5kcalories a day over the last 3.5 weeks at 217lbs, it's supposed to be 4500 but I fucked up twice and had an 8kcalorie day, plus going slightly over a lot of days. I eat pretty damn clean except for the fuckup moments and my Mrs. Buttersworth syrup in my preworkoutnmeal. High fructose corn syrup is bomb af, I tried some Log cabin syrup with no high fructose corn syrup amd it sucks ass. How well were you hydrating?
There are two or three closely related ideas when it comes to upper limits for drugs, the maximum safe dose (MAXSD) and the maximum recommended therapeutic dose (MRTD). There another, which is the maximum effective dose (MAXED). They're defined slightly differently but, for everyday medical decisions, they're largely viewed as the same thing.This is what I was wondering. With pharmaceuticals, there is always an upper limit - do not exceed this dosage - regardless of what the therapeutic indication in amount/kg?
I just learned a few things. Thank you.There are two or three closely related ideas when it comes to upper limits for drugs, the maximum safe dose (MAXSD) and the maximum recommended therapeutic dose (MRTD). There another, which is the maximum effective dose (MAXED). They're defined slightly differently but, for everyday medical decisions, they're largely viewed as the same thing.
MAXED and MRTD are the most closely related. Max effective identifies where there is a plateau in efficacy beyond which more doesn't do anything. Max recc. identifies plateaus, similar to max effective, but will pull back the dose further based on when the side effect profile exceeds the benefit.
You can see the first bit of wiggle room already... if a medication treats two different conditions, and one is way more serious than the other, the max recc of the same drug is going to be different. A drug that targets WASF3 for cancer is reasonable to take at doses that cause really profound side effects because the alternative is death. If the same drug is used to treat chronic fatigue, you may end up making yourself worse off if you take an oncological dose.
Max safe (in some formulations) looks at ONLY the side effect profile, forgetting the plateau analysis -- how much can a body handle without severe toxicity. This is a useful number to have floating around -- maybe you have a really oddball patient with a super rare mu-opioid receptor mutation and you ONLY have opioids for a surgery. Will a typically supertherapeutic dose induce liver damage, for instance. Or if a drug is discovered to treat a secondary condition, questions of effective and therapeutic dosages may vary based on the new mechanism of action. On the other hand, if a drug partitions right into
And of course, there's the statistical reality... these are all averages, and individual physiology varies. Most of us carry more muscle and less fat than an average dude. Depending on how a drug is partitioned among tissues, that may make a huge difference, so even a mass per bodyweight range is just an estimate.
The problem with these numbers of AAS is that they're derived from the incredibly narrow use cases that some of the drugs are approved for. Some researchers work on approximating these figures from illicit use, but the error bars are much larger... trusting someone to record their own data and assuming the drug they're taking is what they think it is. But for most of the compounds we're interested in, we're so dissimilar to the patient population both in health status and body composition that it's all very grain-of-salt stuff. You have to look at which tissues are the first to experience deleterious effect and then make a rough guess if body differences will substantially inform the number.
It's, frustratingly, another area where bro science and other people's misfortunes are still our best guides.