Big Mike
Member
I was thinking 600mg per week too! But excellent results either way!
Big Mike
Big Mike
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly I wish it was a little less.Same thing I was thinking. 600mg per week of test prop. Clarification would be nice though! All in all its a hella number for TT!
One week is 600mg and the next is 450mg. It's eod. I try not to "top it off" as well.I was thinking 600mg per week too! But excellent results either way!
Big Mike
So @Boilermech was right with 525mg! Man thats great results @AlphaCapa! What gear u running (brand, pharma)?Honestly I wish it was a little less.
One week is 600mg and the next is 450mg. It's eod. I try not to "top it off" as well.
Spetz gear. But these results are not without great contriversy. Just check out his sub in the underground. You'll see. Nobody believes it but it's right there. It's even hard for me to believe. Shit. I actually feel a little uneasy being that high.So @Boilermech was right with 525mg! Man thats great results @AlphaCapa! What gear u running (brand, pharma)?
Big Mike
Honestly, fuck if I know. I'm not physciologically gifted and I'm trying to make sense of this.Aren't Dr Scallys numbers based off of test e/c and not test p?
If I remember correctly, test p has a higher actual mg of testosterone. Wouldn't that change the 8-10x rule to say 9-11x as an example?
Just curious on your guys thoughts on this! Also if he is running Spetz, he does claim he over doses his gear by a bit.
Honestly, fuck if I know. I'm not physciologically gifted and I'm trying to make sense of this.
Dr. Scally might be on the money, he might not. There's so many factors that would skew the test one way or another. Factors I wouldn't even know about because I'm not as educated on it as well as I would like.
All I know is I followed protocol on here. Pin 24hrs before bloodwork, go in fasting.
Most people aren't on board with this but I don't care. I'll be doing a follow up in another 3 weeks and at 12 weeks to see the trending numbers. Maybe we'll all learn some cool shit.
I'm thinking of just going next week to see if the test was botched somehow.
That says it all!Not to mention @AlphaCapa est. 90% of his posting are in the Spetz thread in his 1.5 month stay here!
Alright lets ease up in here on @AlphaCapa we know what most of us think. This thread is for different ressons. We will include it in the data unless completely found to be skewed.
@AlphaCapa post your numbers and leave it at that. Please continue to post them. Community discuss alphas numbers and thoughts in spetz thread.I . This thread needs to stay on point.
As far as prop and more mg that does not apply in the finished labeling of a product. All my prop blood work has been in line with my other esters.
@AlphaCapa stay with protocol on any further testing please do not deviate it will help maybe just maybe with your rep.
We have to be careful we do not want to discourage anybody from posting . There is a asterisk on this blood work so to speak here. I know what you are saying and understand completely. Just like any study the extremes are thrown out.Why even consider to use the data when it's obvious that the data is questionable to say the least? If there is not a clearly defined criteria of "who" data is collected from than what we're doing here could possibly suffer.
Think about it, what's to stop the next AlphaCapa clown from posting up some BS to get their UGL sales inflated!
Call me crazy but I don't think it makes sense to use data from a source that we do not promote here on Meso. It would be different if it was a neutral source or just some random internet source.
It seemed suspect when the OP failed to mention his source when first posting his lab results.
I never ordered from Spetz nor do I care to. I vote we call this data a flier and toss it! Collecting this data IMO will only skew our findings. @Colt44 your thoughts?
We have to be careful we do not want to discourage anybody from posting . There is a asterisk on this blood work so to speak here. I know what you are saying and understand completely. Just like any study the extremes are thrown out.
@Colt44 this test doesnt even matter because it is at the three week mark it and we need six week results anyways. We will wait and see his six week results.
@Colt44
I know what you are saying but I believe when it comes to labeling and this is FDA standard you have to label the ACTUAL Testosterone available. So when it comes to labeling if it says 100 or 300 the ester does not matter it should be the actual amount of testosterone per ml. Also is not understood that brewers when buying raws is the same the actual stated amount Test is the amount of test. We have been in circles on this one but when it comes to labeling it should be the actual testosterone per ml.Testosterone propionate does contain more testosterone in the compound due to the "lighter weight" of the propionate ester versus the longer esters. So the ratio of actual testosterone in testosterone propionate mg:mg is higher than enanthate and cypionate esters. However, this does not verify the authenticity of his bloodwork results.