MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Mike Wyck Criminally Charged

laclark89 said:
I agree but per population I bet more Canadians lol, they just seem to be a lot nicer and calmer for the most part. That’s a good thing. I am and was just joking around u see I said lol. I never Mean to offended anyone on the internet I just talk crap.
I like to watch Ron partlows stuff honestly.
Click to expand...

U are the best thing.
Ever.
❤
Lol, chiquito, you always brighten up my day.

Feeling a bit better?
Hope you have given the wife a break, just because it's Sunday, and are not driving her mad, as usual.
Lol.
Lots of love to you both.
:)
 
MfgEng said:
I am in Canada and have some experience.

If no criminal record next to nothing. With a good lawyer and the actual help of the video the charges are likely to be dropped.

If no criminal record and he takes duty council or if he has a minor record then it's a fine.

There is a saying in Canada "the first one is free" meaning the first time something happens with the law with something small like a BS assault like this it's kid gloves. The very last thing we want to do is put someone in prison. Very last. (Prison meaning federal time which is 2yrs or more sentence) It's not only expensive it turns half bad people pretty bad quite often and we know that, don't want to do that. Suspended sentences are frequent for fairly serious offences on the first conviction (say aggravated assault using only fists but the guy really, really pounded the other guy and he got hurt). You really gotta try to go to prison on the first offence here.

Second and subsequent convictions for serious crimes all the rules go out the window and it's a case by case basis.......

Here is a great example...... Take a look into the story of Clinton Suzack. I was in his presence 2wks on London St in Sault Ste Marie Ontario before he killed the cop. He was on his way to parole before he died of natural causes in prison.
Click to expand...

Thank you for replying to me.
Mr Malfeasance, who enjoys all things legal, will like you a lot.

He dropped this thing here and abandoned us.

Looking forward to seeing you back here, OP, with your brutal pragmatism and dry sense of humour.
:)
 
Hah some comments are hilarious. So let me get this straight, since Mike is a huge alpha and jeff a beta midget that makes Mike a wussy attacking a smol manlet but if he had attacked a man in his stature everything would be fine, right? lol..that doesn't make any sense, unless there's some racism involved. A grown up man assaults another grown up man for a shitty reason, these are the facts. It doesn't make it worse if one is big and the other one ain't.
 
Eddie. said:
Hah some comments are hilarious. So let me get this straight, since Mike is a huge alpha and jeff a beta midget that makes Mike a wussy attacking a smol manlet but if he had attacked a man in his stature everything would be fine, right? lol..that doesn't make any sense, unless there's some racism involved. A grown up man assaults another grown up man for a shitty reason, these are the facts. It doesn't make it worse if one is big and the other one ain't.
Click to expand...
Are mongs with head tats a race now?
 
That fkin weasel Nipperd with his natural BS .... FIRST his juiced up..wins a pro card as a natural has a neck as thick as his skull than goes onto youtube to show me how to train my neck meanwhile his off the juice with a pencil neck with all the science studies .... No juice no gains.... No matter wut the fuck he does in the gym....
He looks decent on insta and he's a short squeaky annoying little cunt.

Don't who that mike guy is :))) but he can sure shove for money :))
 
There is CCTV video, but I cannot find it.

I see several out there on social media claiming that they have seen it, and that it backs up Nippard and not Wyck, which would explain why Nippard is still at the gym while Wyck is banned and now charged with crimes.

There are several witness statements as well.

Apparently somebody posted on social media that he was there and that Nippard got up in Wyck's face and all this other nonsense, but it turns out he was not there and that his post has disappeared.

Wyck films in the gym, too, so I have no idea what all the hate is about filming. He has a Youtube channel and posts his videos.
 
malfeasance said:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2drZbAemllc


Look at the hooks on that rack.

Had Nippard's head fallen back directly on to one of those, this could have been a very serious, perhaps even fatal, incident.
Click to expand...

The J-hooks of the rack, the metal framing of the machines, even the floor padded as it might be could have caused serious to fatal injury. Then we still have Van Wyck not just leaving it with a single sucker-punch but following up with another and then shoving Nippard's cameraman into another machine.
 
The second Youtube guy presents Jeff Nippard's narrative and the CCTV video out of order to create a false impression.

Nippard wrote, as shown on the video, "I then asked him, 'What did you mean by that?' and I made sure my camera man was filming in case he tried any funny business." See around 7:20 on the video.

And that is what the CCTV shows. Nippard walks several steps toward Mike Wyck, and very obviously says something to his camera man and to Wyck.

That is exactly what is shown on the video. It matches Nippard's narrative.

This YouTube commenter, however, says Nippard leaves this part of the video out of his narrative. The YouTuber does that by going on in the narrative to say Mike comes over and shoves him backward, which, again, is exactly what the video shows, but the YouTuber presents this part of the narrative, and only then, after, shows the part of the video where Nippard asks Mike "What did you mean by that?" and instructs his camera man to film "in case he tried any funny business." Basically, he presents the CCTV video out of sequence with the narrative to pretend Nippard was lying.

Nippard never claimed he did not walk toward Mike to ask him the question. He says he asked the question and told his cameraman to film just in case. You see that is exactly what happens on the video.

The narrative fits exactly with the video if you are not looking to present them out of order from each other to create a false impression that Nippard is lying.

His narrative and the video do not contradict each other.
 
malfeasance said:
The second Youtube guy presents Jeff Nippard's narrative and the CCTV video out of order to create a false impression.

Nippard wrote, as shown on the video, "I then asked him, 'What did you mean by that?' and I made sure my camera man was filming in case he tried any funny business." See around 7:20 on the video.

And that is what the CCTV shows. Nippard walks several steps toward Mike Wyck, and very obviously says something to his camera man and to Wyck.

That is exactly what is shown on the video. It matches Nippard's narrative.

This YouTube commenter, however, says Nippard leaves this part of the video out of his narrative. The YouTuber does that by going on in the narrative to say Mike comes over and shoves him backward, which, again, is exactly what the video shows, but the YouTuber presents this part of the narrative, and only then, after, shows the part of the video where Nippard asks Mike "What did you mean by that?" and instructs his camera man to film "in case he tried any funny business." Basically, he presents the CCTV video out of sequence with the narrative to pretend Nippard was lying.

Nippard never claimed he did not walk toward Mike to ask him the question. He says he asked the question and told his cameraman to film just in case. You see that is exactly what happens on the video.

The narrative fits exactly with the video if you are not looking to present them out of order from each other to create a false impression that Nippard is lying.

His narrative and the video do not contradict each other.
Click to expand...
I'm going to do a little "victim blaming" here. Not that I think Wyck's actions are excusable. Isn't Nippard—by tellling his camera man to keep filming "in case... funny business"—essentially admitting whatever he planned was going to result in an altercation?
 
bigMoJo said:
I'm going to do a little "victim blaming" here. Not that I think Wyck's actions are excusable. Isn't Nippard—by tellling his camera man to keep filming "in case... funny business"—essentially admitting whatever he planned was going to result in an altercation?
Click to expand...
Maybe everybody that knows him knows that he is ready to boil over. Best to film any interactions with such a person if possible.

The "Oh, Things are about to get real funny" comment is a not so very veiled thread.

I would, in Jeff Nippard's shoes, want to get that cleared up rather than wondering whether this big dude is about to attack me in the gym at any point in time. Filming it was a wise precaution.


And if asking him what he means is likely to provoke a violent attack against both him and his camera man, if I believe that is likely, I am damn sure going to ask him to keep filming.
 
And there is no consensual fight. Nippard does not even attempt to defend himself. After the first shove, which comes rather suddenly and is not expected, he keeps after him as Nippard is retreating before Wyck attacks again. Then he attacks his young little camera man for no discernible reason that I can tell other than that this seething bundle of rage saw a convenient outlet to lash out yet again.

Now he gets mug shots, and such a person should have mug shots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BuildABro
In your opinion, what are the fundamental advantages in life to being jacked? Any disadvantages?
2
Replies
29
Views
746
readalot
readalot
M
My experience with Shanghai Sigma Audley (SSA)
2
Replies
22
Views
2K
forhealth87
F
O
Life changed after TRT, glad to be here
Replies
18
Views
245
Oldguy:
O
Trenbolonetax
"New Member"
2
Replies
30
Views
437
Rawbie
R
A
New member introduction
Replies
0
Views
22
ARMD
A

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top