Musclefactorylabs

oh boy Im glad Ive never popped my Tren cherry or else id be in the same boat as you guys..Is it really THAT GOOD?? Ive just always stuck to Test, was a little intimidated by the infamous sides of tren...haha BTW Luck, Im not picky, Promo or Contest, anything to keep a couple bucks in my pocket so the old lady isnt bitching because i cant afford the cheesecake factory this month lol:D
 
oh boy Im glad Ive never popped my Tren cherry or else id be in the same boat as you guys..Is it really THAT GOOD?? Ive just always stuck to Test, was a little intimidated by the infamous sides of tren...haha BTW Luck, Im not picky, Promo or Contest, anything to keep a couple bucks in my pocket so the old lady isnt bitching because i cant afford the cheesecake factory this month lol:D

Haha!!! That is too funny... Cheesecake factory...... Lol!!!! :D
 
We perform a preliminary melting point test on all our raws. It is enough to ball park the purity levels as well. This is done on a melting point apparatus utilizing glass capillary tubes. It's also the most feasible option for an UGL, IMO.

I have also recently begun using the colorimetric tests by labmax as well. Although I can't determine the purity of our raws with labmax alone, I send off small samples of large batches and expensive compounds to a close friend of mine to test with GC/MS. He is unable to obtain any printouts or copies of the report since it's at his workplace.

If anyone has any information leading to place where I can obtain official documents safely, please let me know. I would be more than happy to send off samples of several compounds to keep you guys happy.

Ricky

Ricky don't take this the wrong way I am trying understand. So the prop that failed Labmax and was replaced went through this melting point test correct? If this is true then why did it not fail on the melting point test?

I do understand why you would only send off expensive raws only to be mass spec by your buddy but you can see why now all compounds need to have this done. You would have saved a ton of $. How about your buddy takes a pic of the screen if printouts are a no no?
 
Duck - it appears as if you have gotten the attention of some folks here with your promo talk. I think you need to make an announcement, a la KMart circa 1985....

"Attention MFL shoppers, we'd like to draw your attention to our Flashing Blue Light special in our AAS department, where for the next (insert time here) we are featuring......"

You get the picture. [:o)]

Good luck with the promo! I hope you knock it out of the pond!
 
Ricky don't take this the wrong way I am trying understand. So the prop that failed Labmax and was replaced went through this melting point test correct? If this is true then why did it not fail on the melting point test?



I do understand why you would only send off expensive raws only to be mass spec by your buddy but you can see why now all compounds need to have this done. You would have saved a ton of $. How about your buddy takes a pic of the screen if printouts are a no no?


The prop that failed was from one of my previous source. We are no longer doing business with him. It was tested and melted perfectly at 119-120c. Melting point tests can only do so much and this is where labmax comes in handy to help determine if hormones are present. It can help identify things with similar melting points such as oxandrolone (anavar) and stanozolol (winstrol).

I've taken some steps to ensure this won't happen again. I now utilize only one factory which I do business with and I can guarantee everything I get from them is legit because I have a contact who personally makes sure everything checks out. However, I still test it after it arrives here in the states. I labmax everything after a melting point test as an added layer of security. If the prop that failed went through the same level of testing we do now, it would be trashed.

Ricky
 
Back
Top