In the past, I was not financially able to assist in that sort of endeavor - now I am. I'm only trying to contribute to harm reduction, that's it, especially as someone, who when they were new to UGL, got buttfucked. This is my personal opinion; I'd rather
HELP a new source get on the right track before fading into the abyss and/or potentially hurting other users. It takes a few minutes out of my day to make suggestions, offer feedback, and do whatever I can to support members like
@readalot (
and supposedly yourself) get a clear message across -- we want sources to be held to a higher standard than in the past. If this means the basic testing we've become accustomed to + sterility testing, that's a move in the right direction, wouldn't you agree? Personally, I'd rather see a new source succeed and prevent current and newer users from getting hurt, it's that simple. There's no weird shit going on here like it seems like you might've been suggesting.
I'm "
demanding" a higher standard of testing, and I'm fairly certain I was
@NeoAnabolics first customer on MESO (
correct me if I'm wrong). IIRC
@readalot seems to be open to the idea of UGL, or at least rhGH, provided they start offering enhanced testing.
Why is this so controversial? We foot the bill and pay an extra few bucks for a vial of AAS for peace of mind? I don't get it. There's members here from back in the day who'd pay $100+ for a bottle of Test and hope for the best. Now we're spoiled with such cheap prices and testing that we've lost sight of having access to someone like
@janoshik, who does enhanced testing at a reasonable cost.