Neo Anabolics (US DOMESTIC)

Once this batch is sold, I will start implementing certain changes you guys want to see. Everyone will not see eye to eye, that is normal. I agree, readalot is bringing up solid points in regards to testing. Some of it I believe can be implemented as a standard. The technology to reduce harm reduction is there, just a matter of what people want. Thank you all for the guidance. The forum belongs to you guys not us.
Thank you for your willingness to consider some of this. I think you appreciate the subtlety of exponential growth. It starts slow but then watch out.

Some current "projects":

[1]

[2]

[3] Axle said he would look into it. Did he? Not sure.

Stay tuned for another sizable one.

An extra buck vs ensuring a quality product. I'll choose the later. And based on the fair feedback I received, I'll spend my $$ to support. And I haven't spent a penny on an UGL product for myself, yet. Zero conflict of interest. Just a moron spending time and money where vendors won't. An educated and aware customer base will change that.

If there's nothing there, then fantastic. Regardless, the bigger picture sources will see the ROI opportunity. No one should be guessing if they are injecting an injurious product (besides the risks that are par for the course on the API).
 
Last edited:
The raws for oils were not tested only for orals. Going forward I will be testing raws of oils and continue to test raws of caps as well. Yes, currently only HPLC for purity and identification of compound. I want to get as close as possible to dosing on labels.
And I should have explicitly mentioned earlier. Thank you for your honesty on this.
 
Thank you for your willingness to consider some of this. I think you appreciate the subtlety of exponential growth. It starts slow but then watch out.

Some current "projects":

[1]

[2]

[3] Axle said he would look into it. Did he? Not sure.

Stay tuned for another sizable one.

An extra buck vs ensuring a quality product. I'll choose the later. And based on the fair feedback I received, I'll spend my $$ to support. And I haven't spent a penny on an UGL product for myself, yet. Zero conflict of interest. Just a moron spending time and money where vendors won't. An educated and aware customer base will change that.

If there's nothing there, then fantastic. Regardless, the bigger picture sources will see the ROI opportunity. No one should be guessing if they are injecting an injurious product (besides the risks that are par for the course on the API).
You are welcome. I believe for that exponential growth, honesty is pivotal as well as transparency. I think brewing in larger batches could justify the additional cost of certain test which are not very big to begin with, definitely a goal for next batches.
 
You are welcome. I believe for that exponential growth, honesty is pivotal as well as transparency. I think brewing in larger batches could justify the additional cost of certain test which are not very big to begin with, definitely a goal for next batches.
Yep I reviewed the additional cost per unit as a function of batch size in my Source QC thread. We are talking less than 5 usd per vial if the vendor were to pass all the costs of additional enhanced testing onto the customer. I think a domestic brewer will probably be the first to take this up. Clearly the large Chinese players appeal to lowest cost buyers where cost is only parameter in objective function.
 
Yep I reviewed the additional cost per unit as a function of batch size in my Source QC thread. We are talking less than 5 usd per vial if the vendor were to pass all the costs of additional enhanced testing onto the customer. I think a domestic brewer will probably be the first to take this up. Clearly the large Chinese players appeal to lowest cost buyers where cost is only parameter in objective function.

I don't think I've ever bought a single vial -- it would be ridiculous to pay shipping on single vials.

So that's a $50 difference per kit. It can add up.
 
I don't think I've ever bought a single vial -- it would be ridiculous to pay shipping on single vials.

So that's a $50 difference per kit. It can add up.
Absolutely. <= 50 USD per ten 10 ml vials. Thanks for bringing that up. We should know more about the costs after we get some of these test results back. What's needed? What's probably not? I am genuinely curious.

The vial example was a unit cost. Absolutely multiply by the number of vials per order to get total additional cost. 1, 3 or 5 usd per vial? Unsure.
 
Last edited:
Has to be cost effective for people. I will look more into it when im ready with a next batch before sending to test. It would be interesting to see a poll of people with interest in certain test versus just purity testing. I have some brain storming to do.
 
Back
Top