Well there's not much to be done about that. Comical at this point. What do you think?I agree kinda, but some people here think u and ghoul are the damn person?
I've never had WKM status. Was never demoted.He popped up the second u got demoted for what ever reason?
Ghoul joined here (early March 2024) about 4 weeks before I received my first temp ban in late March 2024. He started posting in April 2024 a few weeks after I was gone. Did I create my next account a few weeks before I was temp banned in anticipation? Can I see the future?
And ur constantly likening and responding to him also? Wtf?
I appreciate the effort he puts in and his willingness to share pertinent material. He gives a great deal to this forum. I don't think he receives any compensation.
Absolutely appreciate him. By the criteria you laid out Jin23, Ghoul and I are all the same person.
And commenting on members status? Take a deep look.
I've been critical of the current algorithm since I joined. Absolutely. You've got the old members whose status was grandfathered in on the prior criteria. The status construct should never be used by noobs to screen for proper info. It's a classic issue on forums.
He’s been here what 8 months and deserves to be put above well known members due to him finding a neche in getting thumbs up when others have been here over 20 years lmao ? Clown.
Clown? Is your argument that the "Vets" and "Masters" did not find a niche to increase their reaction score? Boasting of bringing someone's daughter back leaking and anal rape? Definitely Elite behavior. Yes, there was some amazing work to hold sources accountable.
Nevertheless, I love pointing out the ridiculous nature of the current setup here. I'm glad Millard has formally recognized it.
I think I have him blocked due to his posts being only fear mongering.
That's your choice. I've made the facts clear. Ghoul and I are not the same person. Pretty easy to figure that out.
So moving forward what do you recommend? Why have reactions and reaction score? What's it for?
Status? No thanks. I saw what I needed to see on that last exchange in the ET threads. It does appear @narta was correct. Thanks for indirectly looking out Narta. Consider me educated now.
Last edited: