Now THAT'S interesting

Grizzly

New Member
I stole this from ASN. We were discussing financial type stuff(namely the lazy american worker who complains about no jobs, but really means no jobs where he can get 30/hr for doing dick). I found this post to be the most interesting thing I've read on a board in a long time. Perhaps, it will beget a discussion.



At about the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution,
in the year 1787, Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor at The
University of Edinborough) had this to say about "The Fall of The Athenian Republic" some 2,000 years prior.

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a
permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning
of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From Bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage."

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul,
Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the most recent
>Presidential election:
Population of counties won by:
Gore=127 million
Bush=143 million
Square miles of land won by:
Gore=580,000
Bush=2,2427,000
States won by:
Gore=19
Bush=29
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Gore=13.2
Bush=2.1

Professor Olson adds:
"In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off government welfare..."

Olson believes the U.S. is now somewhere between the "complacency and "apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy; with some 40 percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
 
Last edited:
Ok, none of you bitches are going to anwer my question so I will point out that I see a contradiction. "The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning
of history, has been about 200 years"
 
dolfe1 said:
Ok, none of you bitches are going to anwer my question so I will point out that I see a contradiction. "The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning
of history, has been about 200 years"
I think that is a very low number. Look at the Chinese, Greeks, Romans and England.
 
There is a difference between the existence of a country, and how long the cycles of govt. within that country cycles.

Israel, for instance, existed for over 2000 years, but it went through incredible political changes. So did China... though the culture itself remained considerably unchanged.

Also, those cultures (egypt, china, and Israel) are arguably rare... they said 'average', and my bet is they need to explain that a bit more.

But I agree with what he said regarding democracy (those were theocracies which lasted so long...). Egyptians did not get the chance to vote nice things for themselves.

I'm not a doom sayer, but will tell you plainly that the economy of the US is about to plummet below what it's ever been before. That will bring about change. But complacent people suddenly taken off the morphine drip of govt gifts, WILL have a major reaction.

It ain't gonna be pretty.


dolfe1 said:
Low! I think there's a zero missing. Now try the Egyptians.
 
"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning
of history, has been about 200 years" This is where the Egyptians apply. And yes they did say average, so what does this mean? That some of the worlds greatest civilizations last less than 200 years? lol I don't think a civilization is eligible for worlds greatest civilization if they have only survived for 200 years, or even twice that, or even three times that. And if you want to talk democracy than who are we talking about? The Greeks?
 
Dunno, like I said, I only agree with what they said on democracies.

Democracies suck for longevity. It's like drug addicts going downhill as soon as the voting yourself gifts things happens.

That's why I'm a republican (who's for legalization of weed, go figure). Democrats just want to take more of my money and give it to people who are addicted to it.

Republicans are the lessor of two evils, in that at least we can survive financially.

(all merely my opinion... subject to change upon factual information arriving in my brain)

dolfe1 said:
"The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning
of history, has been about 200 years" This is where the Egyptians apply. And yes they did say average, so what does this mean? That some of the worlds greatest civilizations last less than 200 years? lol I don't think a civilization is eligible for worlds greatest civilization if they have only survived for 200 years, or even twice that, or even three times that. And if you want to talk democracy than who are we talking about? The Greeks?
 
Well the Greeks survived for about a thousand years and their government did not fall, they were conquered. And I can understand if you agree with what they are saying but I don't see how they gathered their ideas from history, doesn't make sense to me. If there's ever a way to see the future it's to look at the past and the past contradicts what these professors are saying.
 
We need to find their study and find out what they meant.

You know they didn't put their names on something that would make them look stupid, so they must have some info we aren't aware of.



dolfe1 said:
Well the Greeks survived for about a thousand years and their government did not fall, they were conquered. And I can understand if you agree with what they are saying but I don't see how they gathered their ideas from history, doesn't make sense to me. If there's ever a way to see the future it's to look at the past and the past contradicts what these professors are saying.
 
Well, keep in mind many very inteligent people put their names on many absurd ideas over two hundred years ago.
 
Ha ha ha...

Hey, your point is well taken. I gotsta find that text.

dolfe1 said:
Well, keep in mind many very inteligent people put their names on many absurd ideas over two hundred years ago.
 
Well, perhaps, he meant the "golden years" of a given society. Rome may have lasted for a thousandish(?) but half of that was a decline and the other half was a building up. The middle ground is the glory years. Maybe that's what he was referring to.
 
MMMMMMMM.... Bondage, I can't wait... I have been a naughty boy... lol.

Anyway, as for living off of the government... at least where I live it is on the rise. "They" say that the un-employment rate is going down... but I wonder if they factor in the families that had to move due to factory reductions and closing? Or, do they factor in the jobs that are available due to the fact that they are building lots of new low income housing? Bah... to tired to finish my rant... besides, I think I am getting off of the subject of "the big picture" of this thread. Carry on
 
Blinky said:
Anyway, as for living off of the government... at least where I live it is on the rise. "They" say that the un-employment rate is going down... but I wonder if they factor in the families that had to move due to factory reductions and closing?
Thats been going on for the past 40+ years, its nothing new. The media makes it sound like Bush and his policies are totally evil and that this is the first time manufacturing jobs have been lost. Oh please.


Blinky said:
Or, do they factor in the jobs that are available due to the fact that they are building lots of new low income housing?
If those people would actually get off their ass and apply for a job, then they wouldnt have to live in low income housing. Maybe its a little different where you live, but just about every business I drive by around here is hiring. Everything from the gas stations and starbucks to insurance companies and banks. The jobs are there, people just have to get off their lazy welfare-collecting asses and be productive for a change.
 
I knew this would get good at some point. In fact, I knew I could count on you to get in on this, Bob.

Blinky- don't worry about it. I had no intention of this having a "bigger picture". In fact, I figured we'd get at least 4 different tangents going. Continue on with your rant. :D
 
i agree with bs ... plus the jobs are there, but people want to start at the top or they think they are to good for whatever ... they definitely need a reality check!
 
That's true. I just finished school and got me a job. They offered 26k. I said, how about 85k? LOL A guy has got to start somewhere and I know that, so I took it. It didn't hurt that, supposedly, after 6mos, I go to 42k. I can live with that.
 
Overtime would raise the standard of living of everyone. However, it's like pulling teeth to get most people to stay any longer than 8 hours. Again, the jobs/money are there...if you're willing to get it.

See, blinky, we're already on tangent number 1. LOL
 
Back
Top