What about an HPLC?
Any credit for a far superior analysis which not only identifies the AAS but also it's concentration!
Any credit for a far superior analysis which not only identifies the AAS but also it's concentration!
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
One Pharma: Bulk Cyp
- Thread starter One Pharma
- Start date
One Pharma
New Member
1st page I said 100mL for mass spec that goes for HPLC as well.
Let's suppose the results were not exactly favorable would that effect the HPLC TT "jug size"?
Let's suppose the results were not exactly favorable would that effect the HPLC TT "jug size"?
If the test shows the product is bunk, what good is a free 100ml jug? It's bunk!
One Pharma
New Member
As I recall a few pages ago, he said he would do it for free...
To answer your question it will be 100mL store credit so next batch that is tested well if one were to be "bunk"
To answer your question it will be 100mL store credit so next batch that is tested well if one were to be "bunk"
Yea but I could sell that larger vial of junk for a greater return on the HPLC cost!
Shit now "they" do it why can't I ?
I've NEVER said I would test source directed samples for "FREE" if fact I've said I won't test them at all and that has not changed.
One Pharma
New Member
Jim, you have made it clear you and I will never do bussiness directly and that is fine, to each their own. I am fully supporting testing of my product and best wishes to someone who receives product and uses you.
I hope that remains your mantra after a few of those jugs are tested!
My decision not to do business with ANY lab being tested, circumvents the notion the data may be fixed, skewed or otherwise altered bc of the potential for bias on my behalf rather than the issue being a matter of free will often expressed colloquially as "to each their own".
Obviously then the most effective means of negating accusations of impropriety is to avoid conflicts of interests altogether, IMO
My decision not to do business with ANY lab being tested, circumvents the notion the data may be fixed, skewed or otherwise altered bc of the potential for bias on my behalf rather than the issue being a matter of free will often expressed colloquially as "to each their own".
Obviously then the most effective means of negating accusations of impropriety is to avoid conflicts of interests altogether, IMO
Last edited:
One Pharma
New Member
I have used every means possible to have my product tested including pm'ing you to receive no response. And I never mentioned you testing for me for free. I fully support full disclosure of every test, bloodwork, and labmax performed.
One Pharma
New Member
Guys, this is what this lab is about? Having accurately dosed product every. single. time. I encourage all to utilize the benefits of testing if you have the equipment necessary. I believe the purity posted earlier. It is certainly nothing to boast about but it was tested through a well respected member of this community. But please, perform all testing and show your results as it will help everyone here.
BIGMESC
New Member
@One Pharma
I think you are missing the point of testing, it is not for you to prove what you have is good, that would benifit you alone as a source and compromise indirectly the testor.
The test sample needs to come from what an end user has recieved without your knowlege that was bought to be tested.
I think you are missing the point of testing, it is not for you to prove what you have is good, that would benifit you alone as a source and compromise indirectly the testor.
The test sample needs to come from what an end user has recieved without your knowlege that was bought to be tested.
One Pharma
New Member
That is exactly what I am meaning. Yes I tried contacting for my own purposes but I am encouraging other who have bought to send anonymous samples as well.
UGL's must to be reminded customers are only testing that which has been purchased bc they HAVE TO. Now that does not bode well for sources or is in any way complimentary. The responsibility to ENSURE appropriate analyses are conducted is the labs and the labs alone. And the results obtained should reveal not only the identity of the AAS but also it's concentration, using an accepted contemporary analytical practice. Nothing more and nothing less is acceptable!
One Pharm you're a new lab and being a new lab requires much more than a few challenging words, a pat on the back and a cracker box gift when customers perform an LC/MS on YOUR PRODUCTS out of necessity, simply because you did NOT have appropriate tests conducted from the outset.
If your going to sell AAS then learn how to do it right and have your products tested correctly. Let me make a suggestion, try the "supplier" first and if they "don't or won't provide such a service" move on until you find one who's legitimate AND does. Accept nothing less!!!
Regs
jim
One Pharma
New Member
Before a single vial was sold, I had the product tested. I agree it is all on the UGL's end to ensure proper dosing through testing. Having it tested through my source was not possible this time. And I have tried contacting you so I may be able to dose my product accurately for the next time before anything is sold and you have made it clear that won't happen. I have exhausted my resources on finding testing. They are Damn hard to find and it is not from lack of trying.
Testing should be performed at the start of every batch and should be randomly tested throughout to keep a source responsible.
I believe we are agreeing on something for once Jim.
One Pharma
New Member
Update for everyone:
Stock starting to be on the lower half of the scale.
I want to say thanks to everyone who has mentioned they will be performing bloodwork, I think that is something many will appreciate here.
If you guys have any questions, please ask away.
Stock starting to be on the lower half of the scale.
I want to say thanks to everyone who has mentioned they will be performing bloodwork, I think that is something many will appreciate here.
If you guys have any questions, please ask away.
One Pharma
New Member
Question for WKM's;
I am reading threads and would like to comment, but do not know the boundaries of sources. I would never post on another sources thread but there are several other threads out there that are well worth partaking in. I am a one man show and while yes am a UGL, I also am interested in other topics here. I would like the WKM's thoughts on this?
I realize I do not need "permission" to do so, but for respect of the community I felt it worth asking.
I am reading threads and would like to comment, but do not know the boundaries of sources. I would never post on another sources thread but there are several other threads out there that are well worth partaking in. I am a one man show and while yes am a UGL, I also am interested in other topics here. I would like the WKM's thoughts on this?
I realize I do not need "permission" to do so, but for respect of the community I felt it worth asking.
johnnyBALLZ
Well-known Member
We're not against hearing your thoughts but it is usually frowned upon for sources to post in other threads.. Reason being, you're a source here to make money NOT a member..
I don't think anyone would take it the wrong way if you posted what you have to say here though..
One Pharma
New Member
Noted.
I would like to keep this board as business related as possible so members won't have to sift through as much other talk that should be elsewhere.
Thanks
Similar threads
