Ghoul
Well-known Member
I mean the whole point here is guys is, would it not be better if we could get the illegal drugs we are having shipped to our house not required to have a signature.. If possible? common sense i would think would be to see if that could be possible. not just accept that that has to be the way it is.. Make sense?
Signature Schmignature, it makes no difference. As you'll see in a post I'm going to make in the Legal section soon, they know every damn pack you've gotten, from which pharma seller and what it probobly contains despite not bothering to inspect it, every one you've sent, your P.o. boxes, Fedex or UPS traffic no exception, and even that clever "no one ever thought of this" misspelled name you use to "fool" their computers. What matters is you don't do anything that crosses the line from mundane paranoid end user they don't care about, cowering behind your curtains, into demonstrating you're even just a seedling of a seller. That's when they'll decide it's time to pull the weed out.
The way you'll know they're taking an interest in end users is when the love letters start being accompanied by the big fines they've always been empowered to issue instead of prosecution but have been waiving in every case.
Last edited: