Pharacom test results, under dosed

[Wunderpus]

I'm a bit stupid here so don't mind me,... but what should his test levels looked like if it had been properly dosed????

I think 7.5-8x would be sufficiently dosed. 10x is a real high, general rule, in my opinion.

 

[double-leg]

I'm a bit stupid here so don't mind me,... but what should his test levels looked like if it had been properly dosed????

6-7x is the norm for a good ugl.
3-4 is considered shit. So if you pin 500 mg and got 1500-2000 its considered underdosed

 

[SmallsMalone]

I think 7.5-8x would be sufficiently dosed. 10x is a real high, general rule, in my opinion.

Wait, 7 or 8X what he was at (1800) or 7-8X his normal? I'm still confused

 

[bickel29]

7x or 8x his weekly dose (in milligrams).

If he is taking 500mg per week, 7x would be 3,500 - 8x would be 4,000.

 

[Wunderpus]

Wait, 7 or 8X what he was at (1800) or 7-8X his normal? I'm still confused

His dose. His "normal" is worthless since he will be shutdown.

 

[Nitrobuste]

So he just has to double the amount he pins. Wheres the problem

 

[Wunderpus]

So he just has to double the amount he pins. Wheres the problem

LOL and double the cost, and the PIP, etc. Not so bueno.

 

[Volley_Fire]

Using the 7-10x rule, his blood levels should be in the 4200-6000 range rather than the dismal 1818 he tested at.

 

[Haunch]

I think 7.5-8x would be sufficiently dosed. 10x is a real high, general rule, in my opinion.

I could have lived with 7x but not 3.5 times

 

[Wunderpus]

I could have lived with 7x but not 3.5 times

Haunch, I agree, 3.5x is abysmal.

 

[MoriorInvictus]

1818TT @ 600mg wk comes out to 3.03x

So he would have to triple his dose to get the labeled dose.

Definitely No Bueno!!

 

[SmallsMalone]

6-7x is the norm for a good ugl.
3-4 is considered shit. So if you pin 500 mg and got 1500-2000 its considered underdosed

Oh I get it now. 600mg X 8 = 4800 total test if it's dosed right.

 

[dbolman]

1818TT @ 600mg wk comes out to 3.03x

So he would have to triple his dose to get the labeled dose.

Definitely No Bueno!!

I don't think it goes by the weekly dose. I think it goes off of the last shot. If the last shot was 300mg it should peek between 2100-3000. That was my understanding.

 

[Nitrobuste]

I don't think it goes by the weekly dose. I think it goes off of the last shot. If the last shot was 300mg it should peek between 2100-3000. That was my understanding.

And what about the gear he pinned before ?

 

[rpbb]

And what about the gear he pinned before ?

Use this as an example, it was posted today

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/strong-gear-test-p-npp-cycle.134365823/#post-1308608

 

[MoriorInvictus]

I don't think it goes by the weekly dose. I think it goes off of the last shot. If the last shot was 300mg it should peek between 2100-3000. That was my understanding.

It should be based on your weekly average, atleast that is my understanding.

 

[MoriorInvictus]

Use this as an example, it was posted today

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/strong-gear-test-p-npp-cycle.134365823/#post-1308608

That was a Prop cycle so it's a completely different thing bud. Not apples to apples.

They also don't talk about dosages and the 10x rule in that thread either.

 

[dbolman]

That was a Prop cycle so it's a completely different thing bud. Not apples to apples.

They also don't talk about dosages and the 10x rule in that thread either.

Check out the Bayer blood test thread. I was going off of Dr Jim's explanation there. That is test e not prop. Here's a screenshot of the explanation. Maybe someone can clarify .

 

[rpbb]

That was a Prop cycle so it's a completely different thing bud. Not apples to apples.

They also don't talk about dosages and the 10x rule in that thread either.

The first bad bloods were off a prop cycle

 

[MoriorInvictus]

Check out the Bayer blood test thread. I was going off of Dr Jim's explanation there. That is test e not prop. Here's a screenshot of the explanation. Maybe someone can clarify .
View attachment 24882

Good find! I think that explains it pretty clearly to me.

One question though; you have the same avi as @naps, what's up with that?