Pharacom test results, under dosed

[bickel29]

Also, wouldn't the ester make a difference regarding the actual MG's/ML of the drug.

Meaning, there's more test in 1mg of test P than of test E, for example. In some cases, the difference is quite large. So how could we establish a blanket _x rule for test? shouldn't it be based on the ester?

There you go, asking 'smart people questions' to a member that's not part of that 'smart people clique'!

I know what you are saying - but I'll defer to the smart people on that one.

 

[Wunderpus]

There you go, asking 'smart people questions' to a member that's not part of that 'smart people clique'!

I know what you are saying - but I'll defer to the smart people on that one.

Well it does make sense, right? If it's less of the actual drug, shouldn't it yield a lower level in the body?

For example, the difference of test a and test c is quite significant. Throw in various pinning sites (sometimes an absorption rate difference of 50%), different body chemistry, etc.... How the fuck can we establish some blanket _x rule for TT results?

@Docd187123

 

[emcomfu]

If I change my dose from 450/wk to 600wk will it skew my bloods in 2-3 weeks? Was gonna draw blood middle of week 7. I pin Monday and Thursday. Monday pinned 225mg can i pin 375 today and 300 twice/ week for the next few to get un-skewed blood results? or shall I stay on 450wk? I want to help the community but I don't want to ruin my cycle with this under-dosed shit.

 

[johnnyBALLZ]

Well it does make sense, right? If it's less of the actual drug, shouldn't it yield a lower level in the body?

For example, the difference of test a and test c is quite significant. Throw in various pinning sites (sometimes an absorption rate difference of 50%), different body chemistry, etc.... How the fuck can we establish some blanket _x rule for TT results?

@Docd187123

Yes but the difference between test e/c is negligible. Test ace isn't quite as common but good test prop is usually closer to the 10x rule than e/c.

It's a rough estimate of 7-10x and it works for many people here. Also, it's all still absorbed. I'm not sure the "absorption rate" makes a big difference once steady state levels have been reached.

Let's not start the 84th debate on this shit again. It always ends the same way.

 

[emcomfu]

Also, wouldn't the ester make a difference regarding the actual MG's/ML of the drug.

Meaning, there's more test in 1mg of test P than of test E, for example. In some cases, the difference is quite large. So how could we establish a blanket _x rule for test? shouldn't it be based on the ester?

Well it does make sense, right? If it's less of the actual drug, shouldn't it yield a lower level in the body?

For example, the difference of test a and test c is quite significant. Throw in various pinning sites (sometimes an absorption rate difference of 50%), different body chemistry, etc.... How the fuck can we establish some blanket _x rule for TT results?

@Docd187123

I was thinking the same thing. E or C should be more like 7x and Suspension 10x Prop 9x?? But has it been narrowed down to the last dosage x7-10 or weekly average?

 

[emcomfu]

View attachment 24898

He posted in the Darius Pharmacom Thread in Underground section. There was so much bullshit going back and forth its hard to find. His response was something like I'm Darius not Pharmacom so don't judge me based on Pharmacoms fuck up, lets wait for more bloods.

 

[skagitmaster]

If you sell a product its your fuck up.

 

[Docd187123]

If you sell a product its your fuck up.

Why then are there manufacturer warranty's when the manufacturer sells stuff to retailers?

 

[skagitmaster]

If I buy something that's broke, I Dont return it to the manufacturer I take back to the store and the person that sold it to me

 

[Docd187123]

If I buy something that's broke, I Dont return it to the manufacturer I take back to the store and the person that sold it to me

when my last iphone went all retarded on me, apple replaced it under their manufacturer warranty not verizon.

 

[rpbb]

If I buy something that's broke, I Dont return it to the manufacturer I take back to the store and the person that sold it to me

So your saying pharmacon is of the hook

 

[Wunderpus]

Yes but the difference between test e/c is negligible. Test ace isn't quite as common but good test prop is usually closer to the 10x rule than e/c.

It's a rough estimate of 7-10x and it works for many people here. Also, it's all still absorbed. I'm not sure the "absorption rate" makes a big difference once steady state levels have been reached.

Let's not start the 84th debate on this shit again. It always ends the same way.

True, I just find it interesting.

 

[skagitmaster]

I'm saying both the seller and manufacturer are liable for the product no one is off the hook.

 

[skagitmaster]

If you went and bought milk from the store that was bad they wouldn't say " you better contact darigold and take it up with their warranty department. By no way am I saying pharma is off the hook pharma and those that distribute their shit are.

 

[Millard]

Thank you, sir...

Is this the only pharmacom product being tested?

No. There are 4 of their products currently at the lab. I will post a matrix of the products being testing soon.

 

[Wunderpus]

No. There are 4 of their products currently at the lab. I will post a matrix of the products being testing soon.

I cannot wait! Do we have an ETA? This is fucking awesome. Thanks MB!

 

[MythotiK]

No. There are 4 of their products currently at the lab. I will post a matrix of the products being testing soon.

Again, thank you very much for all you do!!

-Myth-

 

[redrum720]

I really wanna know the verdict (this why we should all contribute) but what if big if they pass who we gonna blame
I bet Frank is still name calling us over at evo

 

[Millard]

I cannot wait! Do we have an ETA? This is fucking awesome. Thanks MB!

I am waiting to hear from the lab.

 

[Wunderpus]

I am waiting to hear from the lab.

Awesome. Thank you.