Pharmacom Labs Bold 300 - HPLC-UV - 2015-06 - performed by SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

AnabolicLab.com

New Member

Attachments

Wow - another round (this time on Boldenone) of succesful results for the labs tested.

I would really, really like to see how these MS results compare to a Labmax test done on the same exact tested sample. That would be interesting to see if there was any deviation between the two, as well as to see just how much glow there was for some of these overdosed products, comparatively speaking.

And to be clear, I don't mean this in doubt of the MS tests, I mean this in regards to seeing how accurate Labmax really is.
 
I do not want to be pain in the ass but I am always skeptical when sources post their own tests.

I have seen it with NAPS posting lab results but in fact some of the product was bunk.
 
I'm am truly really surprised of these tests
Its like they keep getting better and better which is weird
But I.don't think.anybody was complaining about the bold
 
I do not want to be pain in the ass but I am always skeptical when sources post their own tests.

I have seen it with NAPS posting lab results but in fact some of the product was bunk.

These are the tests straight from the lab anabolic.com
Where the Other tests are being done
It's not a pharmacom funded test
 
I do not want to be pain in the ass but I am always skeptical when sources post their own tests.

I have seen it with NAPS posting lab results but in fact some of the product was bunk.

Ebola - if you are skeptical of labs that tell us that their gear is good, whether it be through their own lab testing or just their claims, then AnabolicLab is something you certainly will want to learn more about - and contribute to - going forward.

Anabolic Lab is your opportunity to see independent testing of random samples that are not influenced by the labs. Given your skepticism of these Labs, this should be an exciting opportunity for you.
 
Anabolic Lab is your opportunity to see independent testing of random samples that are not influenced by the labs. Given your skepticism of these Labs, this should be an exciting opportunity for you.

anybody can be behind this site

there was program in UK called WEDINOS, it was government run, I can trust this one
but there is no way to verify this site.

it can be as well used to promote some gear.

I have seen a lot of analysis run here by other members and almost all was bunk, underdosed.

sorry but I will never be 100% convinced.
 
I'm very happy with the site,did alot of research on what millard was doing, the protocols used, and feel it is a very important source of information. Check out the site anaboliclab.com and tell us what you think before rushing to judgement
 
anybody can be behind this site

there was program in UK called WEDINOS, it was government run, I can trust this one
but there is no way to verify this site.

it can be as well used to promote some gear.

I have seen a lot of analysis run here by other members and almost all was bunk, underdosed.

sorry but I will never be 100% convinced.
Millard's behind it bro... Your skepticism is unfounded.
 
I have seen report publish by Italian customs, they do run tests on all intercepted steroids

they published list about 100 all was bunk, none of the samples were even close to pharmaceutical grade.

it is still somewhere on Italian customs web site, this one is 100% real and reliable
 
I have seen report publish by Italian customs, they do run tests on all intercepted steroids

they published list about 100 all was bunk, none of the samples were even close to pharmaceutical grade.

it is still somewhere on Italian customs web site, this one is 100% real and reliable
than I guess you're saying all ugl steroids are bunk?
 
anybody can be behind this site

there was program in UK called WEDINOS, it was government run, I can trust this one
but there is no way to verify this site.

it can be as well used to promote some gear.

I have seen a lot of analysis run here by other members and almost all was bunk, underdosed.

sorry but I will never be 100% convinced.

I have seen report publish by Italian customs, they do run tests on all intercepted steroids

they published list about 100 all was bunk, none of the samples were even close to pharmaceutical grade.

it is still somewhere on Italian customs web site, this one is 100% real and reliable

To be clear ebola, I am not here to argue with, nor convert you.

And, you, me, every member here should question any info put out there. None of us should blindly trust any info - there is always the possibility for an agenda.

But if you check out the site, and if you believe in Millard (many of do), you'll see its merits, and see that there is integrity behind it.

It comes down to a matter of trust, but let me ask you this -- whom do you trust more? Millard Baker and Simec, or a government of a country? I very much do believe that governments have an agenda in everything they do.

Think about it.... why would a government want to declare that most of the steroids coming in are bunk?
First, money! To justify it's program. Surely since these steroids are bunk and possibly harmful, they MUST keep paying these government employees to intercept and test these packages.:rolleyes:
Second, for public perception. Good thing the government is looking out for its citizens and saving them from these bunk drug dealers ripping their people off.
:rolleyes:

I trust Millard. I do not trust governments.
 
anybody can be behind this site

there was program in UK called WEDINOS, it was government run, I can trust this one
but there is no way to verify this site.

it can be as well used to promote some gear.

I have seen a lot of analysis run here by other members and almost all was bunk, underdosed.

sorry but I will never be 100% convinced.

I am extremely grateful for all the members have placed their trust and confidence in me. But I realize not everyone is familiar with my track record and my commitment to steroid education and harm reduction for AAS users.

It is always good to be skeptical. I can't simply tell people to "trust me". The AnabolicLab program must demonstrate its trustworthiness. The question is 'what can be done to inspire the trust of the community?'

Trust takes time. And with time, I believe AnabolicLab can inspire the trust of the community by showing that its interests are aligned with the best interests of the consumers and that it can consistently and competently deliver its promises of objective and unbiased lab reports. AnabolicLab will always strive to honor its stated objectives.
 
Some.ppl are just stupid and ignorant
Every person who donates is actively involved in these test it's not one person and also it's not just pharmacom being tested and pass
I know Millard put it in play but I feel this is a meso.community project
 
Until the process of sample acquisition and chain of custody is more thoroughly elaborated upon by ALS, many AAS users will continue to view reports of this nature with a jaded eye.

(Moreover the failure of ABLs to include any raw data, which would be required to formulate a narrative summary, only generates more skepticism IMO)

If these results are in ANY WAY acquired from the respective manufacturers, distributors, or their employees compliant data of this nature should be expected.

However whether these assays are something Meso members in the USA can use for THEIR COLLECTIVE BENEFIT is another matter.

Finally although I doubt there is any one individual more trustworthy than Millard in this cut throat PED business, the accountability I'm referring to is ABLa almost exclusively.

If they want to earn the trust of THIS COMMUNITY, simply posting the analyses of a few select samples whose origin is unknown just will not do IMO.

I've made a few suggestions (as have others) about how this degree of trust may be achieved, legal restraints aside, choice is theirs and theirs alone IMO

Regs
Jim
 
Back
Top