No - it got worse. [emoji23] 2 of my 5 packs have already been seized. They mentioned someone else had their pack seized 3 times. I read somewhere some other guy had like 7 of 9 seized. No more stealth shipping either. I’ve also noticed that it takes them about 7-9 days before they even send the shipment. For example, I placed an order on the 13 - it was dropped at the PO the 20. Delays are worse. Seizures are worse.
So how many, count them up, how many is that?
Because, hopefully you are aware that there are literally thousands of orders a month.
This is not a small lab -- it is world-wide one of the biggest brands.
Across all English speaking boards, how many seized packs can you count so far since the move to the EU?
Now compare that with how many customers and orders there are -- clearly it did not get worse.
You do not have the data to even make sweeping claims.
Maybe you had worse experiences personally but that does not mean overall, across the thousands of other customers, it is worse.
Oh well, I understand you are upset and people here clearly see you are a very passionate and emotional person -- I respect that and nothing wrong with that at all.
All I mean is that you can only speak to your own experience. Some of us follow sources over a long-term and on many boards.
Someone such as myself has access to broader data and consults for the company regarding such matter as success rate and methods.
I can say with confidence that the EU enjoy a much better success rate than China.
Even if for some reasons you do not believe me or my insight, let me make an independent objective point -- simple logic.
A company exists to make money and NOT lose money.
The time, effort, labor, investments etc are all for the purpose or making income.
The company has access to all the data and has decades of experience.
DO you really think the company would choose to invest money and make an expensive move to have a worse success and loose money?
Obviously, the move cost a lot and was not something that happens overnight -- a long time of panning, investing, and considering risk vs reward go into such decisions.
It was already clear that the EU was enjoying better success and so the choice was made to endure a higher operational cost because higher success would be in the best interest of the company.
IF there were no higher success rate from the EU, then a company would prefer to enjoy the cheaper costs in Asia.
These facts alone show it must be an improved rate or the source would simply ship from Asia and have a greater profit margin.
The source wants to make money brother not lose it to seized packs and re-ships. If business was not successful, the source would cease to exists -- no success equals no money and who/how would workers get paid, raws get purchased, risk be taken etc -- its not a charity.