A source can have the best testing data in the world, but if their customer service is bad, it says a lot more than lab testing. JMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't trust PCSo you don't trust any of Anabolic Lab's tests?
I would absolutely agree with you except for one reason. It's the lab that Millard himself has chosen to do the anonymous Anabolic Lab testing. I have to believe that if that lab was in anyway not trustworthy Millard wouldn't use them because any dispute contesting their honesty would jeopardize the validity of and nullify the findings of the entire Alab project. If the lab in anyway skewed their findings, as in faked information because Pharmacom paid them off or anything of that nature, they would have much to lose. It wouldn't be hard for someone that had a bug up their ass to bring into question the labs validity. Cross testing using another lab and having conflicting results would easily start the conspiracy ball rolling. As far as the reports posted...I'm sure when a member sends in the compound to be tested he receives a copy of the report as well so the reports posted would have to be accurate or entirely faked and I already expressed my thoughts on that. Obviously I have already considered what you are saying and these were my thoughts at the time. Or maybe I'm just completely naive...I think you are correct Melly Mel. But imo I wouldn't use any testing lab that PC is involved with! Just saying. ...
I respect your opinion Melly Mel. I also respect what MB is doing but that doesn't mean he knows everything that goes on behind close doors. This is just my feeling that side shit could possibly be going on. And I'm not alone.....I would absolutely agree with you except for one reason. It's the lab that Millard himself has chosen to do the anonymous Anabolic Lab testing. I have to believe that if that lab was in anyway not trustworthy Millard wouldn't use them because any dispute contesting their honesty would jeopardize the validity of and nullify the findings of the entire Alab project. If the lab in anyway skewed their findings, as in faked information because Pharmacom paid them off or anything of that nature, they would have much to lose. It wouldn't be hard for someone that had a bug up their ass to bring into question the labs validity. Cross testing using another lab and having conflicting results would easily start the conspiracy ball rolling. As far as the reports posted...I'm sure when a member sends in the compound to be tested he receives a copy of the report as well so the reports posted would have to be accurate or entirely faked and I already expressed my thoughts on that. Obviously I have already considered what you are saying and these were my thoughts at the time. Or maybe I'm just completely naive...
Simec has been around for awhile I believe. They've been testing way before this Pharmacom stuff has been going on.
Like I said, I can be naive at times. I want to believe that it's all on the up and up and my opinion is based entirely on my own logic and reason and I want to believe that's the truth but I would never say that what you're saying is bullshit. Human's are always trying to get over to advance their position. There is plenty of dishonesty out there especially when drugs are part of the equation.I respect your opinion Melly Mel. I also respect what MB is doing but that doesn't mean he knows everything that goes on behind close doors. This is just my feeling that side shit could possibly be going on. And I'm not alone.....
This^^^^^^ You nailed my brother! Then throw millions of dollars at stake and you understand my way of thinking.There is plenty of dishonesty out there especially when drugs are part of the equation.
I think it would come down to raws most of the time, and if they are too lazy to test them or not IMOI think with aas there is so much money to be made with a legit business that a scam is a waste of money.
After reading these last two pages i'll definitely be going back in for bloodwork once starting cycle. Anyone heard anything good or bad about their cyp 250?
Because they generally only bother testing larger scale international UGL that are good (alpha pharma comes to mind). You guys slam reputable UGL like pharmacom, yet will use some small time domestic UGL getting raws from who knows where in small batches and barely doing any quality control. I don't get it. I also tend to trust Millard Baker's integrity. He dug into a discrepancy based only on word of a source once and issued a retraction of a test report because of a flaw in methodology. After that I didn't question his integrity. It could have easily been ignored.I want to believe Anabolic lab is a completely honest endeavor, but I have also been wary of possible side shit.
How is nearly every lab scoring damn near perfect on there right now? I mean that's great, but im usually a too good to be true kinda guy.
I would absolutely agree with you except for one reason. It's the lab that Millard himself has chosen to do the anonymous Anabolic Lab testing. I have to believe that if that lab was in anyway not trustworthy Millard wouldn't use them because any dispute contesting their honesty would jeopardize the validity of and nullify the findings of the entire Alab project. If the lab in anyway skewed their findings, as in faked information because Pharmacom paid them off or anything of that nature, they would have much to lose. It wouldn't be hard for someone that had a bug up their ass to bring into question the labs validity. Cross testing using another lab and having conflicting results would easily start the conspiracy ball rolling. As far as the reports posted...I'm sure when a member sends in the compound to be tested he receives a copy of the report as well so the reports posted would have to be accurate or entirely faked and I already expressed my thoughts on that. Obviously I have already considered what you are saying and these were my thoughts at the time. Or maybe I'm just completely naive...
Simec has been around for awhile I believe. They've been testing way before this Pharmacom stuff has been going on.
it is about our EU warehouse only. International and US domestic warehouses keep working as usual. If you ordered from EU warehouse to the USA, PCT for example, you need to make payment before 7th of August so we could ship it.I'm confused...when you say it will only be the eu warehouse and if you dont manage to pay in time your order will be delayed for indefined period of time...im ordering from int but live in usa that doesnt even concern me right? i already placed order just waiting for payment method approval before i can pay
most of people who tried it did not have any severe pips.Who has had experiences with the PRIMO 200? How is the pip, feel it was accurately dosed?
glad to see it. thanks for the blood work. Do you mind if i copy this picture to our other boards?
Mix 3, latest resultBy the way, why there aren't reviews on Mix 3?
I'm interested on giving it a try but I don't seem to find any useful info on it...
one more resultAnyone use pharmacom adex? i know nothing beats Pharm grade but hey i got some pharmacom stuff.. is it worth using?
i replied all emails today... our email is sales.int@basicstero.com or sales.us@basicstero.com or sales.eu@basicstero.com. Are you sure you addressed me at one of these emails?im dissapointed with pharmacom i got bunk halotestin. ive messaged them and still no reply ive pm frank his little helper ive emailed them thru the site man im not to happy.. i took 100mg of the thing and felt nothing no effects whats so ever..first time buyer and i got some bunk
I am not sure what you would like to see on a blood work after halo. It can only show some secondary signs like lowering of FSH, LH, SHBG, increased count of red blood cells, but this all can tells by implication that some drug of a steroidal nature is there, nothing more.going to get bloodwork done on monday...regardless of that ive used pharma grade halo before at a few of my pl meets and let me tell you it hits pretty fast. pharmacom halo nothing
if you send a sample to simec here are their prices:how would i send it to simec and how much would that cost
yes this is correct. our general policy is like this. If a product is bad we pay for everything and completely replace bad item, even with bonus. If an item is ok, we shall not be liable for any expenses. But in case with halo above as well as in the case in a neighbor tread with dbol we are ready to pay for both tests. of course if you want to pay on your own and absolutely exclude our participation, also not a problem, we can go this way as well. we will in this case only have to pay almost a doubled price because if a person sends only one single sample to simec he/she shall pay about 350 Euro for this. By the way, one more question. You said you took pharmacy grade halo... is it produced officially at all? Maybe i am wrong, but i thought it is officially not approved for human use now.I believe I remember Frank saying fairly recently that if you believe you got bunk gear, you send it in and if it's bunk then they pay for tests and give you replacements on everything you bought of that compound. If it tests good then they don't pay for the testing and no replacements for you. I'll say again...I think that's what he said.
there is no way we have any impact on Simec. They are a certified lab and they even can stand in a court to confirm the results if needed, they would never counterfeit any results and risk their reputation, this is the same as the risk to get the lab closed and loose a job. Just impossible.I would absolutely agree with you except for one reason. It's the lab that Millard himself has chosen to do the anonymous Anabolic Lab testing. I have to believe that if that lab was in anyway not trustworthy Millard wouldn't use them because any dispute contesting their honesty would jeopardize the validity of and nullify the findings of the entire Alab project. If the lab in anyway skewed their findings, as in faked information because Pharmacom paid them off or anything of that nature, they would have much to lose. It wouldn't be hard for someone that had a bug up their ass to bring into question the labs validity. Cross testing using another lab and having conflicting results would easily start the conspiracy ball rolling. As far as the reports posted...I'm sure when a member sends in the compound to be tested he receives a copy of the report as well so the reports posted would have to be accurate or entirely faked and I already expressed my thoughts on that. Obviously I have already considered what you are saying and these were my thoughts at the time. Or maybe I'm just completely naive...
Simec has been around for awhile I believe. They've been testing way before this Pharmacom stuff has been going on.
glad to see it. thanks for the blood work. Do you mind if i copy this picture to our other boards?
yes sure, i will contact you.That's fine if I still get the $100 store credit. Weren't you offering it to the first 10 people to test the new gh?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk