You guys can't have it both ways. When a new source hits Meso one of the first things we ask them during their trial by fire is, is their gear tested. So if they say no they get put on blast with members saying "how can you acurately dose if you don't test your raws" or "how do you know it's acurately dosed if you don't test your vials" and if they do test you say "the tests are skewed because their doing their own testing" or "their swaying the results by sending in the good stuff".
I've put quite a few sources on blast when they first showd up here and Pharmacom was one of them but we've come to see over time that these guys are a huge global distributor of AAS. Maybe the smaller labs do selective scamming or skewing test results but I really don't think that Pharmacom is one of those. If you've seen their production video's they produce massive runs of their compounds. We've seen test results after test results done by Pharmacom and by members and for the most part they test very well. Even true Pharma grade drugs produced by the big drug companies are given a 20% variable plus or minus on their dosing. Yes that's correct. If Phizer makes their statin cholesterol drug and it says 20mg per tab and it tests at 16mg it's still considered a pass and that's big pharma standards. The vast majority of Pharmacom's compounds are well within that 20% window. Do you really think that a company that produces thousands of vials per run is selective scamming? It would be harder for them to keep that shit straight then it would to just send everybody the same gear. How would it benefit them to selective scam? They're not some company that produces 100 vials at a time.
As far as selling bunk gear...I'm sure they have their problems getting a bad batch of raws every now and then but given the volume of gear they produce I would imagine that their raws suppliers want to keep them very happy based on the amount of raws they must purchase. If the raws suppliers sell them bunk raws it wouldn't take much for Pharmacom to cut them loose and find a more reliable supplier. When they first showed up I don't think anyone knew how big they really are. This is not some Joe Blow fly by night gear lab.
Several have said that it's suspicious that they pay for all this testing. Why? The amout they spend on testing is a drop in the bucket to them. They probably have a budget per year for testing just like the budget they have for advertising, marketing, and everything else. It's part of their cost of doing business. They don't pay for advertising here so is it so unbelievable that they have the funds to test. If they test well it's really like advertising because good testing will lead to increased sales and doing business with a quality raws dealer will lead to good testing.
I'm not saying that they couldn't fall apart at any time, they could. And it is our responsibility to keep them under the microscope to keep ourselves safe but there are some things that a company this size just wouldn't benefit from long term.
I've put quite a few sources on blast when they first showd up here and Pharmacom was one of them but we've come to see over time that these guys are a huge global distributor of AAS. Maybe the smaller labs do selective scamming or skewing test results but I really don't think that Pharmacom is one of those. If you've seen their production video's they produce massive runs of their compounds. We've seen test results after test results done by Pharmacom and by members and for the most part they test very well. Even true Pharma grade drugs produced by the big drug companies are given a 20% variable plus or minus on their dosing. Yes that's correct. If Phizer makes their statin cholesterol drug and it says 20mg per tab and it tests at 16mg it's still considered a pass and that's big pharma standards. The vast majority of Pharmacom's compounds are well within that 20% window. Do you really think that a company that produces thousands of vials per run is selective scamming? It would be harder for them to keep that shit straight then it would to just send everybody the same gear. How would it benefit them to selective scam? They're not some company that produces 100 vials at a time.
As far as selling bunk gear...I'm sure they have their problems getting a bad batch of raws every now and then but given the volume of gear they produce I would imagine that their raws suppliers want to keep them very happy based on the amount of raws they must purchase. If the raws suppliers sell them bunk raws it wouldn't take much for Pharmacom to cut them loose and find a more reliable supplier. When they first showed up I don't think anyone knew how big they really are. This is not some Joe Blow fly by night gear lab.
Several have said that it's suspicious that they pay for all this testing. Why? The amout they spend on testing is a drop in the bucket to them. They probably have a budget per year for testing just like the budget they have for advertising, marketing, and everything else. It's part of their cost of doing business. They don't pay for advertising here so is it so unbelievable that they have the funds to test. If they test well it's really like advertising because good testing will lead to increased sales and doing business with a quality raws dealer will lead to good testing.
I'm not saying that they couldn't fall apart at any time, they could. And it is our responsibility to keep them under the microscope to keep ourselves safe but there are some things that a company this size just wouldn't benefit from long term.
.. 
Hence posts saying these guys are gtg the shit is fire lol 
