I could be wrong here... but read several threads where claims that PC codes did not check out.IF the actual lab itself NOT a re-seller (in our case that is what we are dealing with here in this thread) was going to send plain oil instead of TEST-E, why in the hell would they put a code on the vial to draw attention to it?
Seems obvious that it is just an error.
I would understand if it is from a re-seller, but this thread is not a re-seller -- logically speaking there would be ZERO benefit for a lab to say their own product is fake!
This would be like a counterfeiter to say to the bank teller, "hey, make sure to double check that money -- I just printed it up myself)...
People lie to gain an advantage; they do NOT lie to make trouble for themselves.
Therefore, I seriously doubt pharmacom made some bunk gear and then entered the codes into their own website data-base to state, upon being checked, that the vial is "fake." -- take a moment and think about it logically.
Now I am not saying that vial is good gear or not (I have no idea) but whether or not it is good gear makes no difference because either way (real or bunk) that actual lab that produced it would NOT purposely print a code that flags it as "fake" upon checking their own website.
So what I am urging you all to realize is that using the check-code when ordering directly from the original manufacture means NOTHING -- it does not mean it is good when its checks as "real" and it does not mean its bad when it checks as "fake."
All it returns is the response the programmer of the sources data-base associated with that value.
The utility in check codes is for cases such as buying in person from a local dealer or buying from an online "retailer" (re-seller) by being able to check if that product code was actually entered into the manufactures data-base to return the "good" response.
Even in such a case it does not mean the gear is good-to-go, it simply means that that vial has a number on it that the original manufacture has in their website data-base (thus, increasing your odds that to good or bad gear did indeed come from the manufacture that the label claims).
After conversation and exchange of information, it appears that major issue was the inability to correctly read code by end-user.
IOW... When code was read correctly it did check out... or am I crazy?