MESO-Rx Sponsor Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

Hey Thanks Darius for the gift on top. First timer using pharmacom an you are a really cool cat I apperciate the help an the professional organization you have brother. Super user friendly those guys looking for a easy to deal with an professional company you found um. Im no shill an by no means a professional everyone rolls the dice when going with any source but this was the most stress free experence so far. Thanks again Darius!
wrong thread bud
 
Hey Thanks Darius for the gift on top. First timer using pharmacom an you are a really cool cat I apperciate the help an the professional organization you have brother. Super user friendly those guys looking for a easy to deal with an professional company you found um. Im no shill an by no means a professional everyone rolls the dice when going with any source but this was the most stress free experence so far. Thanks again Darius!

Now that you told frank how u feel about Darius, won't you go to pharmacomstore thread and tell Darius how u think about him
 
Hey, if the validation codes come back as fake, how can you tell us to use our "brains".

And your logic is that who would ever fake Test E?

You've lost me, talk to me like I'm a 5th grader and please explain to me why we shouldn't be concerned for a system that validates the real gear from the fakes.

Now this could be a computer cliche and will resolve on its own, however I haven't seen an issue where a fake vial was validated as real afterwards.

Frank
I didn't say anything about codes man...just don't believe that troll's theory.
 
Well I couldn't get the other number but Beardsman did some investigating and found that it was not a "m" I'm the code it was in fact a "rn" that particular bottle is authentic according to the pharmacom site. I'm gonna go ahead and say that the other one was good and most likely just a matter of perception of what was printed.

Call off the dogs people!! It was in fact I who fucked up...... I think
Shocking...
 
It's my opinion, you are ridiculous. I haven't been here long enough to have an opinion? Lol this is an unmoderated board. So who looks like an idiot again?

The guy above my comment is a well known member but he's an idiot too huh? Cmon man.
You do. Enter codes correctly before crying wolf.
 
Nah im not looking for a discount man. Theres plenty of PC stuff. Idk there is like 5 threads saw one threw my comment in. An there is my good deed of the day indeed. But thanks boss for not being an ass like most. Peace.
Lol... WTF are you talking about?

Is it my age or my mental ability, cause I'm confused!
 
Pharmacom does inform customers about discreet shipping when they choose it, both on site and in generated emails.Besides this, the option is mentioned in our FAQ also. If someone does not reads it, it`s not our fault.

you`ve misread the code. Don`t know why people check them, in any case Basicstero can not have fake codes. But if it makes you feel better, please do.

We updated our ordering terms and included an extra section. It specifically considers concerns you just mentioned. So, here is what we got:

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1. Basicstero.info is direct store of Pharmacom Labs, we are Pharmacom Labs. We produce all items available in stock in our store. Therefore, we control the manufacturing process and quality of all products in our range. You get real manufacturers guarantee. Thus, items of questionable quality are a subject for free replacement. Users have right to request replacement of questionable items. If this is the case, an independent qualitative/quantitative examination of an item in question by a third-side lab is required. This is our regular solution procedure for similar cases. As a rule, we use independent GMP-certified accredited Swiss lab Simec AG (www.simec.ch). However, to absolutely exclude any tiniest possibility of our influence on the testing results, a customer is authorized to choose any certified lab on his/her choice. There are 2 compulsory conditions to keep the testing results as trustworthy as possible for both sides:

I. Only untouched/unopened items (vials/ampoules/pills) should be sent for testing. Since after an item is open its contents, purity and composition are no longer under our control we can guarantee the quality of unopened items only.

II. The lab chosen should correspond to all respective testing standards. Each test report should have an individual verifiable number, so that any person could contact the lab, provide report number and make sure that the result was not forged.

If a customer decides to take advantage of this item of the terms, he/she shall inform us about this in advance, provide order Nr., which contained the product in question and photos of it. Basicstero.info is bound by these terms to replace to the customer the item sent for testing independent on whether the final result will be positive or negative. Furthermore, if the lab report shows negative and some considerable deviations are found, Basicstero.info will completely cover all testing expenses and provide to the customer a good bonus for all inconvenience caused. However, if the report shows positive and no significant deviations are found, the customer should cover all testing expenses, but he/she still gets items sent for testing replaced.

Important: Deviations of the dosage within +/- 10% from the value manifested on the label are permissible.

Questions regarding the entire testing procedure, testing expenses, payment details and all other aspects are to be discussed and agreed individually per e-mail.

2. All claims/complains/blood works regarding Pharmatropin (Human Growth Hormone) are considered only within 1 week (7 days) upon order receipt (as per tracking number). Since Pharmatropin requires special storage conditions and should be kept refrigerated to keep its potency for a long time and we cannot check whether these conditions are observed by a customer, we may not and should not be reliable for any inefficiency or bad blood work results caused by improper storage conditions.
Frank, 7 days is not enough for IGF test...
 
You do. Enter codes correctly before crying wolf.

Did you look at the picture I uploaded? I thought I was entering the code right ...5 times. The v's are connected at the top. I didn't make the mistake. Their code printing font is the problem. And when you put the "wrong" code in and it says FAKE in big red letters, I shouldn't come here and ask for help? My first post was a picture asking if I was reading it wrong!!! But that's crying wolf?
 
That's called reverse scamming.

No that's called being honest. They don't have a retail counter where I can return the item nor do they approve of shipping the item back to them. The only option is to throw it away personally. I was just being honest that I would not chuck it. There have been COUNTLESS times where in a legit retail setting they say just keep the wrong item after fixing. Hell does Arby's make you give back the curly fries they gave you when you ordered tater cakes?!
 
IF the actual lab itself NOT a re-seller (in our case that is what we are dealing with here in this thread) was going to send plain oil instead of TEST-E, why in the hell would they put a code on the vial to draw attention to it?

Seems obvious that it is just an error.
I would understand if it is from a re-seller, but this thread is not a re-seller -- logically speaking there would be ZERO benefit for a lab to say their own product is fake!

This would be like a counterfeiter to say to the bank teller, "hey, make sure to double check that money -- I just printed it up myself)...

People lie to gain an advantage; they do NOT lie to make trouble for themselves.
Therefore, I seriously doubt pharmacom made some bunk gear and then entered the codes into their own website data-base to state, upon being checked, that the vial is "fake." -- take a moment and think about it logically.

Now I am not saying that vial is good gear or not (I have no idea) but whether or not it is good gear makes no difference in regards to the check-code result because either way (real or bunk) the manufacturer that produced it would NOT purposely print a code that flags it as "fake" upon checking their own website (even it it is bunk).

So what I am urging you all to realize is that using the check-code when ordering directly from the original manufacture means NOTHING -- it does not mean it is good when its checks as "real" and it does not mean its bad when it checks as "fake."
All it returns is the response the programmer of the source's data-base associated with that value.

The utility in check codes is for cases such as buying in person from a local dealer or buying from an online "retailer" (re-seller) by being able to check if that product code was actually entered into the manufactures data-base to return the "good" response.
Even in such a case it does not mean the gear is good-to-go, it simply means that that vial has a number on it that the original manufacture has in their website data-base (thus, increasing your odds that the good or bad gear you purchased from a 3rd-party seller was indeed produced by the manufacture that the label claims).
 
Last edited:
IF the actual lab itself NOT a re-seller (in our case that is what we are dealing with here in this thread) was going to send plain oil instead of TEST-E, why in the hell would they put a code on the vial to draw attention to it?

Seems obvious that it is just an error.
I would understand if it is from a re-seller, but this thread is not a re-seller -- logically speaking there would be ZERO benefit for a lab to say their own product is fake!

This would be like a counterfeiter to say to the bank, "hey, make sure to double check that money -- I just printed it up myself)...

People lie to gain an advantage; they do NOT lie to make trouble fro themselves.
Therefore, I seriously doubt pharmacom made some bunk gear and then entered the codes into their own website data-base to state, upon being checked, that the vial is "fake." -- take a moment and think about it logically.

Now I am not saying that vial is good gear or not (I have no idea) but whether or not it is good gear makes no difference because either way (real or bunk) that actual lab that produced it would NOT purposely print a code that flags it as "fake" upon checking their own website.

So what I am urging you all to realize is that using the check-code when ordering directly from the original manufacture means NOTHING -- it does not mean it is good when its checks as "real" and it does not mean its bad when it checks as "fake."
All it returns is the response the programmer of the sources data-base associated with that value.

The utility in check codes is for cases such as buying in person from a local dealer or buying from an online "retailer" (re-seller) by being able to check if that product code was actually entered into the manufactures data-base to return the "good" response.
Even in such a case it does not mean the gear is good-to-go, it simply means that that vial has a number on it that the original manufacture has in their website data-base (thus, increasing your odds that to good or bad gear did indeed come from the manufacture that the label claims).

I see what your saying but disagree. There have been multiple times when I've seen people think they have edited from basic but have put in the wrong .com or whatever it may be. This is just one way it would be useful to have this option for customers. To make sure that they actually purchased legit product from the actual site.
 
I see what your saying but disagree. There have been multiple times when I've seen people think they have edited from basic but have put in the wrong .com or whatever it may be. This is just one way it would be useful to have this option for customers. To make sure that they actually purchased legit product from the actual site.

Now I see this is what you were saying. To make sure the product actually came from Pharmacom. But some people have actually thought they were ordering directly from basic and were not. This would also be a good way to make sure.
 
Back
Top