godsgifttoearth
Well-known Member
A small comment on the result of the anavar tabs.
For us the result is within our standards, and there is no problem with it:
tab 1: 11.72mg
tab 2: 9.41mg
tab 3: 9.15mg
Average = (11.72+9.41+9.15)/3 = 10.09mg
This result matches perfectly with the standards of more than 90% of customers who buy from UG, and you know very well that those who find a problem with this result you are a minority.
For the average bodybuilder, who will take 50 to 100mg per day of anavar, it will not affect their daily intake either in terms of health or in terms of gains, on the other hand it will do a lot of good for their wallet getting a box of anavar for less than $6 delivered domestically.
You are free to have very high pharma standards and to go elsewhere to take perfectly precise 0.01 mg at 10 times the price, which matches your standards, but it's useless to ask us to align with your standards, and again I just see hypocrisy because if some who were repeating "Fuck You QSC" on 150 pages like @MadBret because we don't match with his standards but he is considering buying in the comment bellow.
It shows how much it is the prices that determine the customer's decision, even if a buch of bored guys here mislead you into thinking that they will have more respect from the members by pretending that they have high standards.
If we have the most active thread on the forum, it's for a reason, it's that you're more interested in us than other sources that have standards that perfectly match your "pharma ones".
You have very high hopes in QSC, Meso has never seen so much lab testing from a source before our arrival, so it's up to you to make your decisions, either to adopt a fair attitude with the source, to keep a certain reactivity on the forum, and put an end to the spamming of trolls who joined in November/December instead of fueling this hatred, in this case you are winners, because I will respond to your comments, if I will invest my time on Meso, it's not to wage war with a bunch of mongs.
If you decide to keep it respectful I am here, if you don't I am not.
i actually agree with the comments on the dosing here. it COULD be better, sources show it can be better and i'd hope you would continue to work on that through the components of the process.
i am far more concerned about the issues with the injectables but at least you are going to be transparent about what their actual dosing is, so i at least know if i'm getting a large dosage difference.