Apparently pointing out that nobody cares about what politics you enjoy struck a nerve with you. Have a good oneObviously I've struck a nerve. While you pretend to be agnostically outraged by a political comment, and not because it makes you're preferred ideology look bad, I'll pretend to believe that you really think political action isn't motivated by political self interest.
The dems have made this move, unlike every other policy pushed by any political party throughout all of history, purely for the good of the county, and not motivated by a careful calculation of the costs and benefits, right?
Here, let me frame it another way for you.
Republicans oppose eliminating the deminimis rule because they don't like unions (they don't), they don't give a shit about American textile workers or the industry (they don't), they know more government workers don't benefit their political interests (they don't), and they've never seen a form of tax evasion they don't love.
Edit: quick google search shows bipartisan support for changing diminimus importation rules. The most recent proposal is cosponsored by house Republican Neal Dean-Florida and supported by Marco Rubio.
We arrive immediately at my point.
Last edited: