Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Where is Declan and why is not here arguing with you?
Good effort from @Anubis666 who is providing cover, during Declan's sabbatical.
But the OG bickering duo is hard to replace, I think.
Can't fix stupid and anyone who can't see how incredibly fucking backwards the shit the ghoul fool posts deserves whatever happens to them. Fucking internet doctor, lawyer, and chemist all in one.
 
Do you have a negative IQ?
It makes no sense, you stupid plug.
5% seizure rate, 20% insurance.
So no matter what, they’re going to be profiting long term 15%. If the average order is 500$ and they profit 100$ every order from Canadians and 95 out of 100 orders go through they just made $10,000 in insurance and lost $2500 in items.
Who has the negative IQ ? Moron
 
It makes no sense, you stupid plug.
5% seizure rate, 20% insurance.
So no matter what, they’re going to be profiting long term 15%. If the average order is 500$ and they profit 100$ every order from Canadians and 95 out of 100 orders go through they just made $10,000 in insurance and lost $2500 in items.
Who has the negative IQ ? Moron
The one week/month they have 80% seizure rate what does that cost them? You one of those people who thinks they should be refunded for car insurance if you have no claims?
 
It makes no sense, you stupid plug.
5% seizure rate, 20% insurance.
So no matter what, they’re going to be profiting long term 15%. If the average order is 500$ and they profit 100$ every order from Canadians and 95 out of 100 orders go through they just made $10,000 in insurance and lost $2500 in items.
Who has the negative IQ ? Moron
example:
Canadian sales $100,000
From 100 orders.

5 orders seized, each order is $4000.
Large parcels have more chances to get seized than small ones.
Loss is $20,000 (20% of total sales)
Pass rate is 95%

Simple math to show you, there is no logic in comparing insurance % and pass rate %.
 
example:
Canadian sales $100,000
From 100 orders.

5 orders seized, each order is $4000.
Large parcels have more chances to get seized than small ones.
Loss is $20,000 (20% of total sales)
Pass rate is 95%

Simple math to show you, there is no logic in comparing insurance % and pass rate %.
Okay now we’re making sense.. larger parcels have a less success rate then smaller parcels.
example:
Canadian sales $100,000
From 100 orders.

5 orders seized, each order is $4000.
Large parcels have more chances to get seized than small ones.
Loss is $20,000 (20% of total sales)
Pass rate is 95%

Simple math to show you, there is no logic in comparing insurance % and pass rate %.
Okay now we’re making sense. But then again the 5% success rate stated then doesn’t apply for larger parcels which is where I was basing my logic from.
 
Back
Top