Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[SpaceForce]

Those right leaning folks at least can tell when a man's a man and woman's a woman, I'll take that over being good at math.

A lot of comments I've seen on women's pics would say otherwise.
Way too many of them can't tell the difference between a labia and a dick.

 

[AnTabolic73]

Your scenario is just as imagined. Before people were comfortable enough to openly 'come out', which bathrooms did you think secret trans and cross dressers were using before?
Was anyone going to female bathrooms to check for nuts?

Men who dress as woman aren't the same thing as men who believe they are women. Those have been around forever. A weirdo man who dresses like a woman performatively or even if they like it, isn't the same thing as delusional men thinking they are in fact a women. Take that and couple it with a few more diagnosis from the dsm and what do you get? Someone u would let your daughter share a bathroom with?

And no, no one was doing a ridiculous thing as checking for nuts. Because ridiculous people didn't come to power only till recently to make it law. None of this was even a conversation 20 years ago.

 

[SpaceForce]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JRLCBb7qK8

 

[AnTabolic73]

A lot of comments I've seen on women's pics would say otherwise.
Way too many of them can't tell the difference between a labia and a dick.

Lol I don't know how to take this comment. There's no rules. Theyre making dicks out of forearms. I had a similar conversation with a woman the other day. She says you would never be able to tell the difference. I was like I think eventually you'll get to a point where u can tell the difference. She said not if it's snipped, would you like to see a picture?

I said no!!! Of all the deviant shit I've seen on the internet and in life. Thats one thing I hope to never see. For many reasons. If it looks real and I cant tell the difference then wtf thank God I'm not single. And if it looks like Dr frankenstein fashioned it I'd hate to see that too.

Anyway, long story short I fucked that tranny.

I'm kidding. But she had me thinking this whole time I've been treating her like she's a woman. Who the hell just has makeshift vagina pictures readily accessible on their phone? Is she a tranny?

It wasn't important. She presents like a woman, I'll treat her like it. It's the bald bearded psycho ones who you're not extending that ridiculous courtesy to.

But if I was on the market. I guess I'd have to do my due diligence.

 

[AnTabolic73]

Anyway. Had my fill of this for today.
People love getting worked up over overblown threats while ignoring more clear and present danger cos they assume they are somewhat immune or far removed.

I've had my fill too. This thread can get back on track. What that track is I don't know.

I enjoy debating these topics. But I know neither side will ever convince the other. It's futile.

 

[glpfun]

Ok let’s get back to basics….

Hi EvErYoNe I rEcEiVeD a ViAl ThAt SaYs TrEnH oN iT wHaT dOeS iT mEaN iS iT tReNh? I gOt ExIt ScAmMeD

 

[SpaceForce]

Theyre making dicks out of forearms.

Wish someone would've told my parents this decades ago!

 

[egruberman]

Because you think engineers are leftists yeah right lol

Don’t presume to know what I think nor attempt to engage in any kind of debate with me. You are not sufficiently well equipped to do so.

That having been said, my statement was predicated on the statistics from the last election that show that Democratic voters on average had achieved a higher level of education over Republican voters. One could argue that this doesn’t inherently imply that one is better at math than the other, but I suspect there’s a strong correlation.

Also, please don't presume that I subscribe to some sort of particular ideology that is vulnerable to commonplace anti-leftist talking points. It would shit up this thread and cause you to appear more foolish than you already do. In simple terms that you can understand, I am neither blue team nor red team.

 

[glpfun]

Im team Jacob

 

[egruberman]

Those right leaning folks at least can tell when a man's a man and woman's a woman, I'll take that over being

I am puzzled by the advantage you seem to think this offers?

 

[Justaguy99]

Lol the actual threat of the female pedophile raping young girls in public bathrooms.

So they only do it if a certain party wins?
Seriously

 

[Justaguy99]

Don’t presume to know what I think nor attempt to engage in any kind of debate with me. You are not sufficiently well equipped to do so.

That having been said, my statement was predicated on the statistics from the last election that show that Democratic voters on average had achieved a higher level of education over Republican voters. One could argue that this doesn’t inherently imply that one is better at math than the other, but I suspect there’s a strong correlation.

Also, please don't presume that I subscribe to some sort of particular ideology that is vulnerable to commonplace anti-leftist talking points. It would shit up this thread and cause you to appear more foolish than you already do. In simple terms that you can understand, I am neither blue team nor red team.

Hate to say it but studies actually prove right leaning voters are of lower iq.
It's just a study not my opinion.

 

[Justaguy99]

I am puzzled by the advantage you seem to think this offers?

But he can't spot a Russian lol

 

[egruberman]

Hate to say it but studies actually prove right leaning voters are of lower iq.
It's just a study not my opinion.

I’m not aware of any specific data that illustrates this. Do you have sources?

 

[CFH016]

I think the stat for more people with education tend to lean left is an interesting one. I dont disagree with it, but there's also the argument for universities being "indoctrination centers" for young people. If left leaning ideals are what is nurtured in college and university, then it would make sense that the majority coming out lean left going into adulthood.

On the other end, you could have many like myself who went into the trades directly out of high school. There is definitely a strong bias (not sure if that's the word I should use, but it works) towards right leaning ideas and ideals in the trades.

This is where I think the argument for "Lower IQ" people leaning right kind of falls on its face, at least from my own life experience. I'm in a construction management role now, so I'm technically "less educated" than a lot of people I work with. A lot of these educated people are fucking retarded though when it comes to anything they didn't need to memorize in a book in order to pass an exam. I don't know everyone's politics and I don't care either. But there are idiots everywhere on both sides of the spectrum, regardless of education. The only thing for certain, regardless of your politics, is that the majority of people cannot think for themselves and have been convinced of what to think a long time ago.

 

[thejumpingsheep]

It doesn't make sense. When I pick an index fund, it's like investing in every stock available. When I have to choose a DEI hire, say a black person, it's not like hiring in every black person. The idea that any and every company needs to hire a "diversified" bunch of folks, or else it will fail, or won't be as successful as it could be if only it had more blacks, or more Jews, or more whatever, is complete horseshit. And what's also horseshit is the notion that the government is mandating this to ensure a company's performance. Sorry if "horseshit" seems aggressive, I swear I'm not internet yelling at you. But you really did bullshit your entire post. The only part that was truly logical is when you yourself noticed that "race isnt a good way to do that."

That is not what you get with an index fund. You most assuredly do not get "every" stock available, not even with total market funds. I cant think of any fund that simply follows an index to the T. It would be impossible to manage even for a computer and performance would be iffy. All of them have criteria and procedure to balancing and most do not cover anything under a specific market cap, not even the supposed "total" market funds. Hiring is similar. There are still a criteria.

This entire narrative that someone is hiring unqualified people because of gender or race is absolutely false. And to be totally frank, this is far more common of the opposite when there is no mandate to diversify. How many times have you seen situations where unqualified family or friends of managers get hired despite other qualified applicants? This is very common. Hell even I am guilty of this. Its normal to favor loyalties even if its not in the best interest of the business.

The people being hired are indeed qualified. What they might not be, is the "best" candidate in the eye of the beholder. In other words, its not like some high school dropout is going to be hired as an engineer just because they are female. They still need to pass the interview. But come time to select, perhaps you shouldn't hire another white male if 90% of your team is already such. Sometimes you need to get out of your comfort zone.

Your argument uses extremes to make a point. Look up reductio ad absurdum. The comment about "diversify or fail" is also a fallacy.

Lastly, when you hire a black person you are indeed trying to get the perspectives of black "culture." Thats the point. When you hire a female, you are trying to get the perspective of another sex. And so on. Of course none of this is exact but the point being made, which you are muddying, is this has proven to be less risky (thus higher chance of success) than single stock picking. Again, lower ceiling, but also higher floor.

 

[powdered_toast_man]

I wouldn't generally expect any average human in the US either right or left leaning to understand statistics. That's a tall order. That said, the demographics suggest that right-leaning folks don't really fall into the "good at math" category that often, statistically speaking.

I majored in math in college.

 

[powdered_toast_man]

That is not what you get with an index fund. You most assuredly do not get "every" stock available, not even with total market funds. I cant think of any fund that simply follows an index to the T. It would be impossible to manage even for a computer and performance would be iffy. All of them have criteria and procedure to balancing and most do not cover anything under a specific market cap, not even the supposed "total" market funds. Hiring is similar. There are still a criteria.

This entire narrative that someone is hiring unqualified people because of gender or race is absolutely false. And to be totally frank, this is far more common of the opposite when there is no mandate to diversify. How many times have you seen situations where unqualified family or friends of managers get hired despite other qualified applicants? This is very common. Hell even I am guilty of this. Its normal to favor loyalties even if its not in the best interest of the business.

The people being hired are indeed qualified. What they might not be, is the "best" candidate in the eye of the beholder. In other words, its not like some high school dropout is going to be hired as an engineer just because they are female. They still need to pass the interview. But come time to select, perhaps you shouldn't hire another white male if 90% of your team is already such. Sometimes you need to get out of your comfort zone.

Your argument uses extremes to make a point. Look up reductio ad absurdum. The comment about "diversify or fail" is also a fallacy.

Lastly, when you hire a black person you are indeed trying to get the perspectives of black "culture." Thats the point. When you hire a female, you are trying to get the perspective of another sex. And so on. Of course none of this is exact but the point being made, which you are muddying, is this has proven to be less risky (thus higher chance of success) than single stock picking. Again, lower ceiling, but also higher floor.

OK, so my description of index funds isn't entirely accurate. Either is your description of what DEI hiring is/accomplishes. The analogy is useless.

"The people being hired are qualified." OK, bro. I believe you

"You're arguement uses extremes to make a point." I swear it didn't. Perhaps I should have said "diversity or not as good" instead of "diversity or fail"? The whole point is that you are trying to say DEI is for the benefit of a company, and that's bullshit.

"Black culture." LOL

You're, again, right about one thing: "none of this is exact." That's for damn sure.

 

[Jeffholio5]

Make QSC Great Again

 

[piggy_nui]

Don’t presume to know what I think nor attempt to engage in any kind of debate with me. You are not sufficiently well equipped to do so.

That having been said, my statement was predicated on the statistics from the last election that show that Democratic voters on average had achieved a higher level of education over Republican voters. One could argue that this doesn’t inherently imply that one is better at math than the other, but I suspect there’s a strong correlation.

Also, please don't presume that I subscribe to some sort of particular ideology that is vulnerable to commonplace anti-leftist talking points. It would shit up this thread and cause you to appear more foolish than you already do. In simple terms that you can understand, I am neither blue team nor red team.

There ain’t a correlation between math and liberal education. The onus is on you to prove that.