definitely not lolLike this a pen ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
definitely not lolLike this a pen ?
I realized that there are more pills besides the pen. but I'm not a fan of appetite suppression. I eat extremely clean. rarely maybe once a month I can afford donuts))))definitely not lol
Please ask the pros what they use in the off season to put on size ….. there’s quite a few large bodybuilders on here. Start a thread in the steroids forum. Trying to put on as much size as possible and see what answers you get !!
I think all good now, replied to all emails.We waiting………
LR3 has always worked better for me to lower blood sugar when I take HGH and insulin and after training lr3 is used to increase insulin sensitivityProč lr3 a ne des?
Sdělte nám prosím své zkušenosti
i am use tst E, deca, EQ anadrol, YK11, follistatin, igflr3, mgfLR3 has always worked better for me to lower blood sugar when I take HGH and insulin and after training lr3 is used to increase insulin sensitivity
Thanks i am in bulking 4 w onlyDobrá práce Bone.
Peptides won't give you insane size, they can help you to progress, but not as much as classic anabolics + HGH and food !
A good amount of Test, + 4-6 iu HGH, and good diet will give you better results than any peptide.
feels like of all the problems people encounter with QSC, this is one that could easily be resolved via an email to your sourceSorry after looking at the labels again I saw that I in fact got YK11 and Superdrol but in tablets instead of inyectable.
Still disappointed in the sense that inyectable superdrol is more expensive than the tablets so I paid more for something that costs less.
Yeah forsure, but it why not post it for everyone to see too? These thing don’t need to be kept private for the benefit of a source, and at the expense of the community.feels like of all the problems people encounter with QSC, this is one that could easily be resolved via an email to your source
Guys I received my second order and I have to say there have been some problems. I already shot you an email @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals to see if we can solve this situation.
I ordered
-1 inyectable winstrol kit
-1 inyectable dianabol kit
-1 inyectable superdrol kit
-1 mk677(tablets)
-1 oxandrolone (20mg)
-1 YK11 (tablets)
but I am missing the superdrol kit and the yk-11 tablets. I got other compound instead which I don't know what it is. I also got a random bag of pills I didn't really order...
Also the inyectable winstrol looks super cloudy and weird, is this normal?
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. Please see the pictures below:
I think my post history would show I'm certainly an advocate for those who speak up against sources behaving badly. I just wouldn't bother providing a review of service until the source has been given a chance to address it. Just becomes piecemeal and difficult to follow. Coming in talking about how disappointed you are when you haven't given them a chance to respond to a simple packing error is only a tiny bit silly in my eyes.Yeah forsure, but it why not post it for everyone to see too? These thing don’t need to be kept private for the benefit of a source, and at the expense of the community.
I agree with this post 100 percent. Put the solution to the issue (if and when there is one) in the review.I think my post history would show I'm certainly an advocate for those who speak up against sources behaving badly. I just wouldn't bother providing a review of service until the source has been given a chance to address it. Just becomes piecemeal and difficult to follow. Coming in talking about how disappointed you are when you haven't given them a chance to respond to a simple packing error is only a tiny bit silly in my eyes.
Doesn't mean I'm right and he's wrong, just a matter of preference. Perhaps QSC should be held to a higher level of scrutiny of small issues given some of the bigger ongoing ones
You know what, you make a great point. The review of service should be done, after a response from the source. That way it’s a fair representation of what the source will do to fix issues.I think my post history would show I'm certainly an advocate for those who speak up against sources behaving badly. I just wouldn't bother providing a review of service until the source has been given a chance to address it. Just becomes piecemeal and difficult to follow. Coming in talking about how disappointed you are when you haven't given them a chance to respond to a simple packing error is only a tiny bit silly in my eyes.
Doesn't mean I'm right and he's wrong, just a matter of preference. Perhaps QSC should be held to a higher level of scrutiny of small issues given some of the bigger ongoing ones
I bought two kits, equaling 20 vials and one of them had a floater. I was credited toward my next shipment for it and already used the credit. Mine was what appeared to be a small piece of rubber. Probably part of the stopper.Let us know how it gets resolved!