nightprowler7
Member
-Obese guy with no job who has been on GLPs for 7 years
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic
- Thread starter Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
- Start date
-Obese guy with no job who has been on GLPs for 7 years
Ghoul
Member
Drop dead dipshit and suffer then. I'm not going anywhere, and there isn't anything you can do about it but cry like the bitch you are.
Take it up with the Admin and stop talking.
Let's see how far "valued contributor" like you gets.
Ghoul
Member
Unsurprising you spend time picturing me, or have an intimate familiarity with meth abusers.
When was the last time you contributed to MESO? I can't find a single post of value from you. Not one.
nightprowler7
Member
I’ve tested a few things. Can you show me just ONE thing you’ve sent in for testing? Oh wait you never have. You just spam your meth addict ramblings about nonsense
Ghoul
Member
Before you venture outside this thread, take a shower, and since it's Tuesday, time to change into fresh(er) underwear so you don't pollute the place with your stench.
This is what contributing to the forum looks like, and I put in the time and effort on a regular basis, like many others here do, but not you:
Not testing some gear you bought, that you're getting reimbursed for. You're doing it for yourself. If it wasn't free, you wouldn't do it.
Nice try repeating Declan's retarded argument that I should "test" terminal sterilization. A universally validated process that guarantees sterilization of the product in its final packaging. One of the points of using that method is to eliminate the need for bacterial testing, according to the FDA.
Your turn, Let's see how you contribute.
BuildABro
Member
On
I will give Tracy credit where it is due however in that they have been pretty diligent about testing the last 6-8 months.
I would like to see more crowd sourcing for specific testing here for popular compounds from popular vendors. If enough of us got involved we would not have to individually chip in much at all.
I will give Tracy credit where it is due however in that they have been pretty diligent about testing the last 6-8 months.
Clover 0080
Member
Are GLp1s (Tirz,Sema and Reta) not tracys products also? Someone listing the stack and dosing they personally use isnt any different than everyone else on here listing what products of tracys they use and for what
Ghoul
Member
As much of a rude fucker he can be, he sets the standard for testing UGL peptides and gear, by a mile.
If only he'd spend a few seconds and 5¢ getting better stoppers, most of the oil issues would be solved.
Ghoul
Member
All their peptides are outsourced. But the difference is he tests multiple vials of every batch, often blind, "post shipping degradation" vials as well, Without that you're flying blind. A vial of 5mg Sema that's actually 6,25mg is going to make a big difference vs one that's 4.75mg for the end user. He also seems to buy enough to have juice with the producers to get them to make changes and improvements.
Justaguy99
Member
It doesn't matter if you block a guy that can't shut the fuck up.
90% are replies stating he's a moron.
In every thread.
Even canadian domestic.
But he lives in Thailand lmao
Ya right.
Like above, 7yrs glass and still can't get 200 stepping.
Thinks it's normal to get infections from pinning.
Thinks fridges need testing
Anyone buying his crap is as stupid as he is.
90% are replies stating he's a moron.
In every thread.
Even canadian domestic.
But he lives in Thailand lmao
Ya right.
Like above, 7yrs glass and still can't get 200 stepping.
Thinks it's normal to get infections from pinning.
Thinks fridges need testing
Anyone buying his crap is as stupid as he is.
Ateam2023
Member
just an update on the August, 
15 iu hgh gb, Janoshik report
15 iu hgh gb, Janoshik report
Ateam2023
Member
Thanks qsc for some decent hgh,
Nowww what will i receive as a free gift? lol
Nowww what will i receive as a free gift? lol
nightprowler7
Member
You are such a clown lol. You haven’t tested shit, you copy and pasting Wikipedia articles doesn’t count as contributing to the forum. Anyone can smoke meth and read Wikipedia. Declan is right, walk the walk. Let’s see some testing on the claims you make.Before you venture outside this thread, take a shower, and since it's Tuesday, time to change into fresh(er) underwear so you don't pollute the place with your stench.
This is what contributing to the forum looks like, and I put in the time and effort on a regular basis, like many others here do, but not you:
Not testing some gear you bought, that you're getting reimbursed for. You're doing it for yourself. If it wasn't free, you wouldn't do it.
Nice try repeating Declan's retarded argument that I should "test" terminal sterilization. A universally validated process that guarantees sterilization of the product in its final packaging. One of the points of using that method is to eliminate the need for bacterial testing, according to the FDA.
Your turn, Let's see how you contribute.
Try and read the room dude. No one likes you but you.
just some dude
Member
wtf is this guy talking about
just some dude
Member
international times for domestic. fucked up
iris
New Member
You know you can also just scroll down, past all the crap you don't want to read, instead of wasting time. Or use the ignore, which will block all the members you want to avoid.
If you have an issue with people going off topic on the qsc thread, you are aiming at the wrong target, with Sampei.
He is not one of the people who has been doing that here, for sure.
If you take a look back, you will see that.
He's been busy with great contributions to the forum, actually.
BuildABro
Member
I might be inclined to agree if not for his generalized MO of lashing out like an unhinged lunatic with walls of barely intelligible text at anyone who questions his assertions. And then following this up with childish personal attacks about how everyone here is a bottom feeder who is not up to his level of intellectual brilliance and lavish social standing. That type of rank nonsense is bound to breed contempt, even from people who would otherwise not give a fuck about anything he might have to say.
But various posters here are on the money that this silliness has more than run it's course. None of this is productive for anyone here.
Ghoul
Member
For those interested in wasting money by following the lead of evil big pharma and protein researchers by needlessly filtering aggregates from their peptides, here are the specs you need to find the correct ones.
In theory, filtering into your syringe just prior to administration is ideal, but even drawing and putting back into the original vial will help. Large aggregates take time, seemingly days at least, to grow from dimer or contaminating silicone droplets from what I've read. You're also eliminating sediments from the peptide excipient that may not have dissolved:
-Material: PES
-Sterile
-Your preferred connections. Most are luer lock to slip tip. I prefer luer to luer using a vial spike to speed things up vs a needle.
-Hydrophilic
-NON-Charged (if it doesn't specify that, it should say "low protein adhesion", "low protein loss", or "low protein adsorption".)
-.2 or .22um (or even .1um will allow peptides through and eliminate more aggregates, but really slow).
-Some recommend 4mm to minimize loss of liquid in the filter. I tried this and what I assume was "protein fouling" completely clogged it before 1ml got through. A good sign it's working. but not practical imo. 13mm is a good trade off.
You can dilute your peptide a little more than usual to compensate, so the retained liquid won't cause as much a loss of active peptide.
Pushing a syringe of air through the filter at the end will eject more liquid from the filter.
Expect a price between 40¢ and $3 depending on source and quantity.
If you need more detailed info regarding peptide filtration, links to current studies, or just want to chat about state of the art protein aggregation mitigation methods contact @BuildABro or @nightprowler7
(note: please send pic first to prove "you even lift" and wait for response)
In theory, filtering into your syringe just prior to administration is ideal, but even drawing and putting back into the original vial will help. Large aggregates take time, seemingly days at least, to grow from dimer or contaminating silicone droplets from what I've read. You're also eliminating sediments from the peptide excipient that may not have dissolved:
-Material: PES
-Sterile
-Your preferred connections. Most are luer lock to slip tip. I prefer luer to luer using a vial spike to speed things up vs a needle.
-Hydrophilic
-NON-Charged (if it doesn't specify that, it should say "low protein adhesion", "low protein loss", or "low protein adsorption".)
-.2 or .22um (or even .1um will allow peptides through and eliminate more aggregates, but really slow).
-Some recommend 4mm to minimize loss of liquid in the filter. I tried this and what I assume was "protein fouling" completely clogged it before 1ml got through. A good sign it's working. but not practical imo. 13mm is a good trade off.
You can dilute your peptide a little more than usual to compensate, so the retained liquid won't cause as much a loss of active peptide.
Pushing a syringe of air through the filter at the end will eject more liquid from the filter.
Expect a price between 40¢ and $3 depending on source and quantity.
If you need more detailed info regarding peptide filtration, links to current studies, or just want to chat about state of the art protein aggregation mitigation methods contact @BuildABro or @nightprowler7
(note: please send pic first to prove "you even lift" and wait for response)
Last edited:
Similar threads
