Readalots Enhanced Testing

Just framing it in the proper perspective.

Great clarification. Should have added that in text (buried in link).

See here:

The difference is much greater for the raws of Project 3 if you normalize the area for API vs ~ene impurities on GCMS data, 70/82 or ~85% and 78/88 or ~89%) vs 96 to 98% by HPLC.

From results with these raws (Project 3) you are talking:

~85% vs 96%+
~89% vs 98%+

Excellent observation on the blood work. Unsure if the LCMS tests at Labcorp or Quest register these impurities as active hormone.
 
Last edited:
With ranges...

Summary on TE purity:
96%+ via HPLC
(78 to 89%*] range via GCMS
* 89% estimated by normalized percentage considering only API and ene impurity


Summary on TC purity:
98%+ via HPLC
(70 to 85%**] range via GCMS
**85% estimated by normalized percentage considering only API and ene impurity
 
Back
Top