Scientist 'killed Amazon indians to test race theory'

flenser

New Member
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
Made me sick just reading it. I hope it turns out to be false...


Scientist 'killed Amazon indians to test race theory'

Thousands of South American indians were infected with measles, killing hundreds, in order to for US scientists to study the effects on primitive societies of natural selection, according to a book out next month.

The astonishing story of genetic research on humans, which took 10 years to uncover, is likely to shake the world of anthropology to its core, according to Professor Terry Turner of Cornell University, who has read the proofs.

"In its scale, ramifications, and sheer criminality and corruption it is unparalleled in the history of anthropology," Prof Turner says in a warning letter to Louise Lamphere, the president of the American Anthropology Association (AAA).

The book accuses James Neel, the geneticist who headed a long-term project to study the Yanomami people of Venezuela in the mid-60s, of using a virulent measles vaccine to spark off an epidemic which killed hundreds and probably thousands.

Once the epidemic was under way, according to the book, the research team "refused to provide any medical assistance to the sick and dying Yanomami, on explicit order from Neel. He insisted to his colleagues that they were only there to observe and record the epidemic, and that they must stick strictly to their roles as scientists, not provide medical help".

The book, Darkness in El Dorado by the investigative journalist Patrick Tierney, is due to be published on October 1. Prof Turner, whose letter was co-signed by fellow anthropologist Leslie Sponsel of the University of Hawaii, was trying to warn the AAA of the impending scandal so the profession could defend itself.

Although Neel died last February, many of his associates, some of them authors of classic anthropology texts, are still alive.

The accusations will be the main focus of the AAA's AGM in November, when the surviving scientists have been invited to defend their work. None have commented publicly, but they are asking colleagues to come to their defence.

One of the most controversial aspects of the research which allegedly culminated in the epidemic is that it was funded by the US atomic energy commission, which was anxious to discover what might happen to communities when large numbers were wiped out by nuclear war.

While there is no "smoking gun" in the form of texts or recorded speeches by Neel explaining his conduct, Prof Turner believes the only explanation is that he was trying to test controversial eugenic theories like the Nazi scientist Josef Mengele.

He quotes another anthropologist who read the manuscript as saying: "Mr. Tierney's analysis is a case study of the dangers in science of the uncontrolled ego, of lack of respect for life, and of greed and self-indulgence. It is a further extraordinary revelation of malicious and perverted work conducted under the aegis of the atomic energy commission."

Prof Turner says Neel and his group used a virulent vaccine called Edmonson B on the Yanomani, which was known to produce symptoms virtually indistinguishable from cases of measles.

"Medical experts, when informed that Neel and his group used the vaccine in question on the Yanomami, typically refuse to believe it at first, then say that it is incredible that they could have done it, and are at a loss to explain why they would have chosen such an inappropriate and dangerous vaccine," he writes.

"There is no record that Neel sought any medical advice before applying the vaccine. He never informed the appropriate organs of the Venezuelan government that his group was planning to carry out a vaccination campaign, as he was legally required to do.

Fatalities

"Neither he nor any other member of the expedition has ever explained why that vaccine was used, despite the evidence that it actually caused or, at a minimum, greatly exacerbated the fatal epidemic."

Prof Turner says that Neel held the view that "natural" human society, as seen before the advent of large-scale agriculture, consists of small, genetically isolated groups in which dominant genes - specifically a gene he believed existed for "leadership" or "innate ability" - have a selective advantage.

In such an environment, male carriers of this gene would gain access to a disproportionate number of females, reproducing their genes more frequently than less "innately able" males. The result would supposedly be a continual upgrading of the human genetic stock.

He says Neel believed that in modern societies "superior leadership genes would be swamped by mass genetic mediocrity".

"The political implication of this fascistic eugenics is clearly that society should be reorganised into small breeding isolates in which genetically superior males could emerge into dominance, eliminating or subordinating the male losers in the competition for leadership and women, and amassing harems of brood females." Prof Turner adds.

In the memo he says: "One of Tierney's more startling revelations is that the whole Yanomami project was an outgrowth and continuation of the atomic energy commission's secret programme of experiments on human subjects.

"Neel, the originator of the project, was part of the medical and genetic research team attached to the atomic energy commission since the days of the Manhattan Project."

James Neel was well-known for his research into the effects of radiation on human subjects and personally headed the team that investigated the effects of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs on survivors and their children.

According to Prof Turner, the same group also secretly carried out experiments on human subjects in the US. These included injecting people with radioactive plutonium without their knowledge or permission.

Nightmarish

"This nightmarish story - a real anthropological heart of darkness beyond the imagining of even a Joseph Conrad (though not, perhaps, a Josef Mengele) - will be seen (rightly in our view) by the public, as well as most anthropologists, as putting the whole discipline on trial," he says.

"This book should... cause the field to understand how the corrupt and depraved protagonists could have spread their poison for so long while they were accorded great respect throughout the western world... This should never be allowed to happen again."

Yesterday Professor Turner told the Guardian it was unfortunate that the confidential memo had been leaked, but it had accomplished its original purpose in getting a full response from the AAA.

A public forum would be held at its AGM in November to discuss the book its revelations and courses of action.

In a statement yesterday the association said "The AAA is extremely concerned about these allegations. If proven true they would constitute a serious violation of Yanomami human rights and our code of ethics. Until there is a full and impartial review and discussion of the issues raised in the book, it would be unfair to express a judgment about the specific allegations against individuals that are contained in it.

"The association is anticipating conducting an open forum during our annual meeting to provide an opportunity for our members to review and discuss the issues and allegations raised in the book."
 
Why doesn't this surprise me? And I doubt it will turn out to be false. Thanks Flenser, interesting post.
 
This kind of thing doesn't suprise me in the least , all of the eugenics programs carried out by progressives are evil. This is the outcome when you put the "greater good" ahead of individual rights and freedoms. This is the kind of dark place it will always take you. The irony of this story is how it will be used in the media and by the progressives of today to smear the USA when this kind of behavior comes from progressivism! This is what it brings , America as founded puts individuals ahead of " the greater good" The USA as founded and the Constitution of the USA is the greatest weapon against these kinds of atrocities! Our government as founded looks nothing like the bastardisation brought about in the last 120 odd years. These evil doers know in order to get their way they have to eliminate the USA as founded and the protection afforded us under the Constitution. That is their goal and it is so fucked up that they blame The USA for their deeds!
 
Anthropology's Darkest Hour
Controversies rage over a scandalous new book on the Yanomam¿ Indians
November 20, 2000 |By Kate Wong

1A17AE9F-C8CE-4180-AF63B1F9D1462EAF_article.gif




J. W. Stewart
Two months after the first reports of the scandalous allegations made in a new book called Darkness in El Dorado circulated among anthropologists, reactions have reached a fevered pitch. At issue is whether two scholars really did start a measles epidemic among the Yanomam¿ people of the Brazilian Amazon and cook their data in the name of science, as suggested by journalist author Patrick Tierney, or whether they stand wrongly accused, victims of an academic witch hunt. Over the past few weeks various organizations and individuals have issued formal position statements on the matter. Most recently, at the annual meeting of the American Association of Anthropologists (AAA) in San Francisco, hundreds of scholars gathered last Thursday night to discuss the inflammatory book at a four-hour-long forum.

000565D2-58A0-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21_arch1.jpg

Source: from YANOMAM¿ RESEARCH GROUP

That forum recapped a running controversy in the community, which first ignited when University of Hawaii anthropologist Leslie Sponsel and Cornell University anthropologist Terry Turner sent an e-mail to the AAA about the then-forthcoming book, which lists a series of heinous crimes said to have been committed against the Yanomam¿ by famed anthropologist Napoleon Chagnon of the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB) and the late geneticist James Neel of the University of Michigan. They described the story as "a real anthropological heart of darkness beyond the imagining of even a Joseph Conrad" and declared that it would be seen as "putting the whole discipline on trial." Specifically, the book charges that Neel administered harmful measles vaccine into the previously unexposed Yanomam¿ people in an experiment designed to support his ideas about eugenics. Chagnon, on the other hand, is accused of causing violence among the Yanomam¿ in order to substantiate his ideas about human nature.

In recent weeks, however, critics have amassed considerable data to the contrary. Tierney, they insist, lacks evidence to support his claims. Indeed, UCSB anthropologist John Tooby and his colleagues have compiled a 74-page rebuttal to the accusations made in Darkness in El Dorado. Among the many counterpoints provided in that report, one stands out as particularly damning: Tierney alleges in the book that Neel¿s team administered the Edmonston B measles vaccine to the Yanomam¿, knowing it was dangerous and thus sparking an epidemic in which live virus from the vaccine spread from person to person. But when Tooby spoke with various investigators from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, he found out that Tierney¿s measles argument was fundamentally flawed. Edmonston B, though no longer in use today, was considered appropriate at the time, and would have proved perfectly safe under those conditions. Moreover, researchers have never documented a single case of a live-virus measles vaccine leading to contagious transmission. According to Neel¿s own account, he and his team were trying to quell an outbreak of the virus.

Apparently the arguments against Tierney¿s measles scenario are so strong that even Turner, one of Tierney¿s strongest proponents, has revised his position on that particular aspect of the story. But others fear the damage has already been done. "Tierney¿s claim that an immunization program can start an epidemic has been carried around the world in media reports," Tooby writes. "This myth could compromise the ability of health care workers to administer such programs, especially in poor countries, and people could die as a result."

000565D2-58A0-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21_arch2.jpg

Source: from NAPOLEON A. CHAGNON

NAPOLEON CHAGNON with the Yanomam¿ Indians he studied in the Brazilian Amazon

Tooby and his team are not the only ones attacking the book. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS), to which Neel belonged when he was alive, has issued a statement correcting misinformation concerning both the academy and Neel. Like Tooby, the NAS discusses the safety of Edmonston B. Both reports further point out that news of a measles epidemic in Yanomam¿ territory was reported by missionaries prior to Neel¿s arrival. The NAS also asserts that Neel did not subscribe to eugenic principles. "On the contrary," they note, "his most substantial professional contribution was wrestling the control of human genetics away from eugenic scientists."

Critics have flocked to Chagnon¿s defense as well. In response to Tierney¿s charge that Chagnon¿s gifts to the Yanomam¿ of metal objects such as pots and machetes (given in exchange for being able to observe them) led to violence, the UCSB researchers point out that the missionaries and gold miners in the area provided many more metal tools to the Yanomam¿ than Chagnon did, as well as shotguns. These people would have also exposed the Yanomam¿ to disease, they say. Ironically, according to the UCSB report, Tierney¿s key sources--other scientists who worked with the Yanomam¿--are accusing Chagnon of the same types of misconduct that he had previously accused them of. The University of Michigan also dismissed the claim that Chagnon was responsible for warfare among the Yanomam¿, noting that accounts of their behavior dating back to the mid-1800s, long before Chagnon¿s arrival, describe them as warlike. What¿s more, the University of Michigan report and others posit that the accusations made in Darkness in El Dorado stem largely from a long-standing academic feud between Chagnon and both Sponsel and Turner, rather than from Tierney¿s own recent discoveries.

Although he faced numerous critics Thursday night at the AAA forum, Tierney apparently stood his ground. "I know it was a wrenching book to read, and for me to write," he said, according to a Reuters report. "I do appreciate how difficult it is to come to terms with some of these issues." Further investigations should reveal who is to be believed. But no matter the outcome, in the end, one group of researchers--and perhaps a reporter--will have tarnished anthropology¿s reputation. They may have also jeopardized the survival of the Yanomam¿ and other indigenous peoples around the world.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/anthropologys-darkest-hou/?print=true
 
Because you believe the US is evil.



Naturally. You wouldn't be much of a conspiracy theorist if you believed otherwise. ;)
Right on buddy! You tell him, no questioning his rulers! This is what happens to the goyim they get experimented on and we should trust that the guys that did it to keep US safer.
 
Because you believe the US is evil.



Naturally. You wouldn't be much of a conspiracy theorist if you believed otherwise. ;)
You are wrong CBS. I don't believe the US is evil. You should always be aware of what's going on around you, and question why.

"The ruling class has the schools and press under its thumb. This enables it to sway the emotions of the masses."
Albert Eienstein
 
I believe most if not all governments are evil, ours included.
This is why the USA was special and exceptional because our founders caim up with a brilliant solution to the problem with governments. The Constitution is a brilliant document that keeps government small and accountable to the people. Unfortunately the progressives on the left and right want power and have been undermining it for the last 120 odd years. When Republicans and Libertarians say that the USA is exceptional the left always makes it out to be a racist argument when it's got nothing to do with race the exceptional nature of what was the USA had only to do with our system of government and the Constitution. We need desperately to go back to the Constitution and restore that exceptional city on the hill that was the USA! FREE MARKETS FREE PEOPLE!!!!
 
This is why the USA was special and exceptional because our founders caim up with a brilliant solution to the problem with governments. The Constitution is a brilliant document that keeps government small and accountable to the people. Unfortunately the progressives on the left and right want power and have been undermining it for the last 120 odd years. When Republicans and Libertarians say that the USA is exceptional the left always makes it out to be a racist argument when it's got nothing to do with race the exceptional nature of what was the USA had only to do with our system of government and the Constitution. We need desperately to go back to the Constitution and restore that exceptional city on the hill that was the USA! FREE MARKETS FREE PEOPLE!!!!

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

John Adams

Do you think we are still a moral and religious people?
 
"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

John Adams

Do you think we are still a moral and religious people?
Unfortunately the progressives have stripped America of her morals. These people(progressives) in my belief are evil. America is full of good moral people I believe they outnumber the evil immoral people by a large % however in the media and the pop culture the immoral and progressive people is all they let you see. In the population centers there's definitely more bad than good but I subscribe to the belief that there's still more good than bad people in the USA as a whole. We are quickly running out of time and need to wake up before it's too late and I'm afraid it might very well not be possible to get everyone's attention.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top