At the ratio of this blend, the small amount of tpp is negligible. It won't matter for TRT or any other purpose, real word. It's literally physiologically equivalent. The pharmacokinetics remain virtually the same. A large part of the discontent is I think you retards don't understand that. You think it's an inferior product or ester timing will be skewed. I could link you to hard evidence/support in the way of literature, but you guys aren't even worth the effort. Its futile here I'm afraid.
And again, for the 10th time, nobody is excusing the fact Karl probably should have done updated labels for this lot/batch. He definitely got bit for this judgment call and will be judged for it. It was not the wisest move. But that mistake is a far cry from knowingly cutting corners or selling underdosed gear. That is the point of defending Karl - that distinction - and that's it. Extra effort was taken here to make sure it was dosed at label claim. TPP was added to make sure of that and he knew it would not alter the pharmacokinetics. I don't think anyone can twist the intent behind that action. He told some customers, but obviously not all. He informed Millard about it as well in relation to the test. I'm not sure saying he got caught lying is accurate. That's the only reason I'm here gentlemen. It seemed to me from the start the chemtox cross check never occurred per the pdf's representation and I belive this is what occurred. Crimele cut corners on the testing. Why aren't you truth warriors attacking him? Why must you pretend Karl tried to intentionally sell inferior product when these actions show additional cost expenditure to make sure it was NOT underdosed?
