xy5jn0
New Member
Well that certainly isn't good news for ChemTox. What else are they testing for but not really testing for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Breaking news: Karl was right. ChemTox retracted its original report on Sciroxx Labs Testodex Enanthate 250.
The sample also contained 65.3 mg/ml of testosterone phenylpropionate in addition to the 207 mg/ml of testosterone enanthate.
I am awaiting an explanation from ChemTox.
so it was proven that karl was right, but it's still bullshit because the label said it was test e
Do you know the story behind that batch? Do you know what people were told about that batch ahead of time? You are drawing a lot of conclusions without investigating and determining what is fact and what is not first. Don't you think that if Karl was trying to save money or rip people off that he would have just left things where they were at 85% accurate dose of test E? I mean nobody would have ever known the difference. Think about it, why would he go to the trouble of adding 65mg of test phenylprop in there? Seems like a lot of work to screw people over.
This should be interesting, since they posted raw mass spec data that lacked a peak for TPP. Would definitely like to see the revised plots : )
Well that certainly isn't good news for ChemTox. What else are they testing for but not really testing for?
Wow what a soap opera. Will be very interesting to see what went on here....also chemtox's BS is now affecting the reputation of anaboliclab which is bush league if u ask me
@Millard Baker Is there an update on the raw data as well? If they detected it, it should be present in the data, and displayed on the plots.
So is chemtox just being shady and saving money by not testing for multiple things?
I think anabolic lab should cut ties with them
You're welcome. If anyone has a question about the validity of any report published by AnabolicLab, we ask them to provide the evidence to the accredited lab which conducted the analysis. If the accredited lab acknowledges/retracts original report and replaces it with a new one, AnabolicLab will always issue a public correction.Thank you for your honesty, integrity, and doing the right thing!
it is bazaar, but the label says test e, his website says test e, and when people order it, they think they are getting test e.Do you know the story behind that batch? Do you know what people were told about that batch ahead of time? You are drawing a lot of conclusions without investigating and determining what is fact and what is not first. Don't you think that if Karl was trying to save money or rip people off that he would have just left things where they were at 85% accurate dose of test E? I mean nobody would have ever known the difference. Think about it, why would he go to the trouble of adding 65mg of test phenylprop in there? Seems like a lot of work to screw people over.
We've raised this issue with ChemTox along with questions about the general usefulness of the ChemTox anabolic steroid screen if it is unable to detect concentrations at levels as high as 65 mg/ml.I suppose the other question is if they didn't test Sciroxx for all those AAS, what about the 4 or 5 other brands they tested?
I am sure Millard is working on this as I type and we shall soon have the answer. Millard has way too much invested in this very successful project to let a wayward lab botch a report.This is really unprofessional and surprising from an accredited lab. It concerns me regarding the other tests performed by Chemtox and how this reflects on the AnabolicLab program. I know AnabolicLab is not at fault for the mistakes of the laboratory. However, the program is built on the basis of reliable and infallible data provided by these labs. Questions need to be answered and the situation addressed correctly for the integrity of the program. If there is a solution to prevent this in the future, this also needs to be addressed.
So his quality control is horrendous and he contaminated a test e batch with TPP or he lied to customers and purposely left the tpp off the vial label. Which is it and does it really matter?