Sciroxx Labs Testodex Enanthate 250 - GC-MS/MS - 2016-01 - performed by ChemTox via AnabolicLab.com

Well that certainly isn't good news for ChemTox. What else are they testing for but not really testing for?
 
On behalf of AnabolicLab, we would like to extend our apologies for publishing the inaccurate ChemTox lab report dated January 29, 2016. We have published a formal correction on the AnabolicLab.com website:

Correction: February 11, 2016
The original lab report dated January 29, 2016 was retracted by ChemTox. The original report stated that no other steroids were detected. The February 11, 2016 analysis of a second preparation of the same sample by ChemTox revealed the additional presence of 65.3 mg/ml testosterone phenylpropionate.

Sciroxx Laboratories Testodex Enanthate 250 Lab Test Results - Anabolic Lab

View media item 830
View media item 829
 
Last edited:
So,to summarize a bottle listing 250mg of a product STILL only has 207 plus a filler of off label ingredients which has been confirmed... AL isn't off the hook but I somehow still don't feel a sudden urge to buy this shit. I'll pass. I still feel safer eating a hotdog since I know more about what's in it.
 
so it was proven that karl was right, but it's still bullshit because the label said it was test e
 
so it was proven that karl was right, but it's still bullshit because the label said it was test e

Do you know the story behind that batch? Do you know what people were told about that batch ahead of time? You are drawing a lot of conclusions without investigating and determining what is fact and what is not first. Don't you think that if Karl was trying to save money or rip people off that he would have just left things where they were at 85% accurate dose of test E? I mean nobody would have ever known the difference. Think about it, why would he go to the trouble of adding 65mg of test phenylprop in there? Seems like a lot of work to screw people over.
 
Do you know the story behind that batch? Do you know what people were told about that batch ahead of time? You are drawing a lot of conclusions without investigating and determining what is fact and what is not first. Don't you think that if Karl was trying to save money or rip people off that he would have just left things where they were at 85% accurate dose of test E? I mean nobody would have ever known the difference. Think about it, why would he go to the trouble of adding 65mg of test phenylprop in there? Seems like a lot of work to screw people over.


So his quality control is horrendous and he contaminated a test e batch with TPP or he lied to customers and purposely left the tpp off the vial label. Which is it and does it really matter?
 
I agree Doc, I really can't imagine in what world this is OKAY, unless he knew they fucked up and played it off as intentional. Truthfully, I don't know the whole side as I don't follow Karl, but it seemed a bit odd from day 1.... Maybe Muscle96ss will have some more insight here.
 
This should be interesting, since they posted raw mass spec data that lacked a peak for TPP. Would definitely like to see the revised plots : )

Well that certainly isn't good news for ChemTox. What else are they testing for but not really testing for?

Wow what a soap opera. Will be very interesting to see what went on here....also chemtox's BS is now affecting the reputation of anaboliclab which is bush league if u ask me

@Millard Baker Is there an update on the raw data as well? If they detected it, it should be present in the data, and displayed on the plots.

So is chemtox just being shady and saving money by not testing for multiple things?

I think anabolic lab should cut ties with them

ChemTox has some questions to answer. We are awaiting a full explanation and will post additional details, including raw data from the analyses of the second preparation of the sample, as they become available.
 
I suppose the other question is if they didn't test Sciroxx for all those AAS, what about the 4 or 5 other brands they tested?
 
Thank you for your honesty, integrity, and doing the right thing!
You're welcome. If anyone has a question about the validity of any report published by AnabolicLab, we ask them to provide the evidence to the accredited lab which conducted the analysis. If the accredited lab acknowledges/retracts original report and replaces it with a new one, AnabolicLab will always issue a public correction.
 
Do you know the story behind that batch? Do you know what people were told about that batch ahead of time? You are drawing a lot of conclusions without investigating and determining what is fact and what is not first. Don't you think that if Karl was trying to save money or rip people off that he would have just left things where they were at 85% accurate dose of test E? I mean nobody would have ever known the difference. Think about it, why would he go to the trouble of adding 65mg of test phenylprop in there? Seems like a lot of work to screw people over.
it is bazaar, but the label says test e, his website says test e, and when people order it, they think they are getting test e.
 
This is really unprofessional and surprising from an accredited lab. It concerns me regarding the other tests performed by Chemtox and how this reflects on the AnabolicLab program. I know AnabolicLab is not at fault for the mistakes of the laboratory. However, the program is built on the basis of reliable and infallible data provided by these labs. Questions need to be answered and the situation addressed correctly for the integrity of the program. If there is a solution to prevent this in the future, this also needs to be addressed.
 
This is really unprofessional and surprising from an accredited lab. It concerns me regarding the other tests performed by Chemtox and how this reflects on the AnabolicLab program. I know AnabolicLab is not at fault for the mistakes of the laboratory. However, the program is built on the basis of reliable and infallible data provided by these labs. Questions need to be answered and the situation addressed correctly for the integrity of the program. If there is a solution to prevent this in the future, this also needs to be addressed.
I am sure Millard is working on this as I type and we shall soon have the answer. Millard has way too much invested in this very successful project to let a wayward lab botch a report.
 
So his quality control is horrendous and he contaminated a test e batch with TPP or he lied to customers and purposely left the tpp off the vial label. Which is it and does it really matter?

Its funny, everybody jumped on the bandwagon and accused Karl of being a liar when he stated what was in the product. Then when it turns out to be dosed EXACTLY as Karl claimed and it turns out that Karl was not a liar, you jump to other conclusions without knowing shit again. Karl has claimed that it was public knowledge of what this batch contained. I don't know the story behind it as I haven't asked yet. But if Karl is telling the truth and the batch was not sold as Test E but as a Test E, Test tpp mix; then there should be no issues. If you have some proof that people bought this batch not knowing what was in it, or that once Karl found out about it, that people were not made aware of it; then by all means post it up and bash Karl as you like. But if you don't have that proof, then give the guy the benefit of the doubt until you can prove that he did something intentionally wrong.
 
Back
Top