Interesting reply. But the truth is, it all just conjecture. However, your animosity is quite clear too.
Id be more than willing to listen to your arguments if they weren't so one sided. And if your comments weren't so empty and void of any real evidence supporting your claims, i may be inclined to stick around and read them. But i have better things to do than read your hate mail.
No offense. I usually enjoy your comments and ideas.
I'm not sure if this was addressed to me but I'm not sympathetic to those promoting quackery and I make no attempt to hide my contempt for such people in my posts. That's just the way I am, sports fans.
Crisler is a convicted wife beater:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/dr-john-crisler-arrest-the-war-on-men.134324824/
It's not my comments that are void of evidence but Chrisler's. I can't prove a negative; it's up to Crisler to prove adrenal fatigue and reverse T3 dominance are real diseases. They are not, nor do they exist in the literature.
Now you may ask why would a physician treat a disease that doesn't exist? Or isn't known to exist? One (unlikely) possibility is that he has discovered a previously unknown disease. But, if that were the case, he surely would have published his findings. Since he hasn't, one can safely conclude the reason is because Crisler knows his hypotheses won't withstand the scrutiny of peer review. Now, it's also possible that he truly believes in these diseases without evidence, but that's not practicing evidence based medicine, it's religion. Hence the reference to cult leader Jim Jones.
However, the most likely reason a physician might treat a fictitious disease - and this is usually always the case - is money.
In regards to your comment that Crisler is "highly respected" in the field of medicine, I offer the following op-ed:
As far as supporting my statement that Crisler resorts to personal attacks and childish insults when challenged for his bullshit by those who know better, he is famous for it. This example is the administrator of a hair loss forum having to admonish Crisler for his belligerence. There are countless other examples:
http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/...=84859&STARTPAGE=13&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
"Dr. Crisler
While I appreciate hearing your opinions on hormonal issues, I have a hard time reading through most of your posts because they are so full of unnecessary personal attacks.
It's against our forum rules to engage in unnecessary personal attacks like you have been doing.
While I respect the fact that you feel you are being disrespected here, I don't see anywhere near the level of personal attacks being levelled against you, as you are levelling against others.
People have the right to question others and I don't feel that they should somehow be presented as a stalker, a nitwit, a shill for a drug company, lacking in manhood or possessing any other character flaw simply for doing so.
Please refrain from these attacks otherwise I am going to close this thread."