[SOURCE] Canadian Domestic Anabolics Introduction

GC usually (not always) works on separating by polarity. Chloroform (tricholoromethane) you mention has polarity vastly different from BA or methanol so it obviously would be separated from either of them.

https://sites.google.com/site/miller00828/in/solvent-polarity-table

I'm not saying that it's 100% the case, or that it was methanol... I'm just saying it's a possibility.... And that possibility sounds more likely to me than somebody doing 20% BA.

Shit, 4% make me limp for days.

---

The other possibility is that CDNDA mixed up his solvents. A simple freeze test would be able to tell you if the BB in his possession is labelled correct, as BB freezes at 18*c.

If he is able to get his "BB" to say -5*c and have it stay liquid, it may be a mislabel and actually be BA (Freezing point of BA is -15*c)


What do you do for work? lol
 
Wouldn't the raws used in that batch of t400 also have been used in batches of test e and test c?

Yes. Of course. At this point im not sure if its human error or the raws. Im erring on the side of caution at this point.

All test I have is with seperate raws. Anything made with those raws are quarantined until further testing is complete.

I dont want to say too much publicly. If you want more detailed info please email me. You may pm the info to whomever you wish. I just dont want to say too much about my operation on a permenant public space.
 
So is my test e good or no? Going to up the amount in case of underdose anyway.

Yes. His T400 has a black top. New raws with the blue tops. It could be the raws are fine and I made a mistake. That's entirely possible.

I'll give you an example of what i do. Im just using an arbitrary number here. Lets use 100 since its an easy number to work with. Lets say i got an order of raws of 100g each if test e and test c powder. Out of that 100 grams. I'll use 20 of each to make 10 vials of T400. I'll use the remaining to make Test 250 of each flavour. What im trying to say is that i dont have hundreds of vials to pull from my list if a problem arises.
 
I appreciate your honesty. So what about myself and everyone else that's getting vials from these raws? Do we now have to run twice as much? How are you going to make it up to your customers? I don't see how you're going to regain anyone's trust.
 
I appreciate your honesty. So what about myself and everyone else that's getting vials from these raws? Do we now have to run twice as much? How are you going to make it up to your customers? I don't see how you're going to regain anyone's trust.

I wont bother speculating. Ive not had complaints about anything being weak. So far Ive only heard about the T400. It could very well have been my error when i batched it.

I may not regain market confidence. That's a reality.

I could just run and hide law low then launch a new lab in a few months but im not. Im hoping thst ssys something.

Everyone can speculate but we wont really know unless its tested. If youd like to send a sample of test in. Im willing to pay for it.

Obviously i cannot afford to pay for everyones testing but no one has sent in a blue top yet so if youre interested get in touch with the tester.

Either you can send it in or I can open a vial and send a sample. Or alternatively you can run it at normal dose then get your bloods done.

Other than that im not sure what i can do. Im open to any suggestions anyone may have.
 
I wont bother speculating. Ive not had complaints about anything being weak. So far Ive only heard about the T400. It could very well have been my error when i batched it.

I may not regain market confidence. That's a reality.

I could just run and hide law low then launch a new lab in a few months but im not. Im hoping thst ssys something.

Everyone can speculate but we wont really know unless its tested. If youd like to send a sample of test in. Im willing to pay for it.

Obviously i cannot afford to pay for everyones testing but no one has sent in a blue top yet so if youre interested get in touch with the tester.

Either you can send it in or I can open a vial and send a sample. Or alternatively you can run it at normal dose then get your bloods done.

Other than that im not sure what i can do. Im open to any suggestions anyone may have.


Here's an idea:

Stick to your day job
 
I wont bother speculating. Ive not had complaints about anything being weak. So far Ive only heard about the T400. It could very well have been my error when i batched it.

I may not regain market confidence. That's a reality.

I could just run and hide law low then launch a new lab in a few months but im not. Im hoping thst ssys something.

Everyone can speculate but we wont really know unless its tested. If youd like to send a sample of test in. Im willing to pay for it.

Obviously i cannot afford to pay for everyones testing but no one has sent in a blue top yet so if youre interested get in touch with the tester.

Either you can send it in or I can open a vial and send a sample. Or alternatively you can run it at normal dose then get your bloods done.

Other than that im not sure what i can do. Im open to any suggestions anyone may have.

All the new samples will be blue tops
NPP 200
Tren a 200
Test P 200
 
Ive never scammed anyone. Im so sick of this drama.

When you do get good results I sure hope you'll post it here. Get bloodwork. Ill give you $100 credit. That goes for anyone doing bloodwork.

@Riz did you get bloodwork on my gear? You were running my prop superdrol and Tren.

Bloods will be done shortly. I'm just waiting on my appointment with LifeLabs.

And while I have your attention,

hopefully you go back to being a smaller operation. I think this whole expansion process is what made your progress collapse.
 
GC usually (not always) works on separating by polarity. Chloroform (tricholoromethane) you mention has polarity vastly different from BA or methanol so it obviously would be separated from either of them.

https://sites.google.com/site/miller00828/in/solvent-polarity-table

I'm not saying that it's 100% the case, or that it was methanol... I'm just saying it's a possibility.... And that possibility sounds more likely to me than somebody doing 20% BA.

Shit, 4% make me limp for days.

---

The other possibility is that CDNDA mixed up his solvents. A simple freeze test would be able to tell you if the BB in his possession is labelled correct, as BB freezes at 18*c.

If he is able to get his "BB" to say -5*c and have it stay liquid, it may be a mislabel and actually be BA (Freezing point of BA is -15*c)

I have tested the sample again using GC/MS and the peak is pure benzyl alcohol, confirmed by mass spectrum.
 
Back
Top