MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Stanford Pharma aka SP = Meso Member Xkawn

That situation is long dead and years old @mands . Not sure why it’d be worth anyone’s time. My point in bringing it up is I wish I was seeing some of that aggression I’d received in that instance. I feel like this is unmistakably snitching! In my situation I just made a dumbass noob comment and caught hell. Looking back I understand why that went that way and wish I’d been quicker to admit my fault and apologize for piggybacking of sins comment.
 
desertwarrior said:
That situation is long dead and years old @mands . Not sure why it’d be worth anyone’s time. My point in bringing it up is I wish I was seeing some of that aggression I’d received in that instance. I feel like this is unmistakably snitching! In my situation I just made a dumbass noob comment and caught hell. Looking back I understand why that went that way and wish I’d been quicker to admit my fault and apologize for piggybacking of sins comment.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry that happened to you. As much as I've learned here, and as much fun as I've had posting fat chicks for laughs, this crap isn't worth it.

I completely understand the complexities of deciding when to censor and when not to. And I respect the reasons for not censoring. I don't feel safe here anymore.
 
mands said:
Did you not read this whole thread. Stanford was Vetted. Just because the newcomers didn’t see it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. You can PM if you ever have question. This jack off @Rapier could of took 10 seconds and asked a Vet here if his detective work was right or wrong. The thing is his intentions wasn’t about vetting sources. It was about being butt hurt about something that happened to him personally.

Thanks man. I’ve always tried to do so. Glad to have you over here.

Haha big man. All true and always have to do some slumming. Lately been doing my share. :) Always a pleasure Big B.

mands
Click to expand...
Now we have behind the scenes vetting. Welcome to SST everybody. Thank goodness you 10 year members will let your friends source as you deem fit. Surely not biased there. Fuck this clown and fuck this place. I'm out on all handles.
 
To those saying Stanford was vetted in the past. Dude in the original post brings up a valuable point - Stanford has 5 threads. Sources are supposed to have one thread and stay in their lane. Everything that’s happened should be in one thread for the members to read - harm reduction.

And members are supposed to reach out to the older members and privately message them? C’mon, that’s not even what MESO is supposed to be about. All information should be in the open, this isn’t a source board.

I don’t agree with how this guy handled all of this, but I see people raising hell over other sources, namely one recently because it was a “OPSEC” risk. That’s all everyone talked about. But this time it’s not allowed to be talked about when someone has “OPSEC” concerns?

It wasn’t so long ago that people demanded another sources previous member handle, then posted it up when he didn’t want to disclose it. This isn’t so much different from that.
 
Brawny said:
To those saying Stanford was vetted in the past. Dude in the original post brings up a valuable point - Stanford has 5 threads. Sources are supposed to have one thread and stay in their lane. Everything that’s happened should be in one thread for the members to read - harm reduction.

And members are supposed to reach out to the older members and privately message them? C’mon, that’s not even what MESO is supposed to be about. All information should be in the open, this isn’t a source board.

I don’t agree with how this guy handled all of this, but I see people raising hell over other sources, namely one recently because it was a “OPSEC” risk. That’s all everyone talked about. But this time it’s not allowed to be talked about when someone has “OPSEC” concerns?

It wasn’t so long ago that people demanded another sources previous member handle, then posted it up when he didn’t want to disclose it. This isn’t so much different from that.
Click to expand...

Slight difference is we always demand the handle and I don't recall anyone voluntarily giving it up, they always cite security risk. The last one didn't properly conceal it on a lab report and it was put out there.
 
Mighty-mouse said:
Are you referring to how I vet the sources on their process? I can’t remember ever actually giving a step by step to anybody.

Most sources don’t use the correct way that’s common knowledge.

Are you a member or source? If your a member are you a vet or someone new?
Click to expand...

i recall you giving advice to Sparta on capping. There was another source too, but they didn't last long and weren't memorable, so i don't recall which half assed lab it was.
 
MisterSuperGod said:
i recall you giving advice to Sparta on capping. There was another source too, but they didn't last long and weren't memorable, so i don't recall which half assed lab it was.
Click to expand...

Yeah I took the post as I have spoke directly to him about the process not during vetting but I see your point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

nightprowler7
Buck raws domestic?
Replies
4
Views
406
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
NeoAnabolics
Neo Anabolics (US DOMESTIC)
17 18 19
Replies
367
Views
11K
NeoAnabolics
NeoAnabolics
Dirthand
Readalots Enhanced Testing
13 14 15
Replies
285
Views
7K
DugPrime
DugPrime
Minty
Mint Anabolics - US Domestic Source
7 8 9
Replies
177
Views
11K
FastBun
F
N
Really stressed out now, did I waste money on bunk test?
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
3K
Tommygunz1401
T

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top