Stanford Pharma aka SP = Meso Member Xkawn

[Oldschool]

I love me a good conspiracy but this is just straight up snitching. The source (sp) has been slow at times but has been solid overall. Xkawn is also a solid member contributing tons to the home brew section. I’ve never seen him promote sp or shit on any other labs. Unless I’m missing something this is some unwarranted bullshit right here.

I think an argument could be made that this was an attempt at doxxing and the members main handle should be at risk of a ban.

SUMBODY BUTTHURT

 

[Mac11wildcat]

I love me a good conspiracy but this is just straight up snitching. The source (sp) has been slow at times but has been solid overall. Xkawn is also a solid member contributing tons to the home brew section. I’ve never seen him promote sp or shit on any other labs. Unless I’m missing something this is some unwarranted bullshit right here.

I think an argument could be made that this was an attempt at doxxing and the members main handle should be at risk of a ban.

How is knowing a sources handles doxxing?

this double standard always kind of blew my mind:
-if we don’t know a sources prior handle we demand to know it
-if we find it out/they disclose either on purpose or not we lose our shit they didn’t protect it

Maybe I’m missing something here. But isn’t the POINT of vetting to KNOW shit? If SP got it light and this slipped by isn’t that appropriate to disclose?

none of this considers if this thread is valid or not; simply talking principle here.

 

[jJjburton]

How is knowing a sources handles doxxing?

this double standard always kind of blew my mind:
-if we don’t know a sources prior handle we demand to know it
-if we find it out/they disclose either on purpose or not we lose our shit they didn’t protect it

Maybe I’m missing something here. But isn’t the POINT of vetting to KNOW shit? If SP got it light and this slipped by isn’t that appropriate to disclose?

none of this considers if this thread is valid or not; simply talking principle here.

I agree

 

[Oldschool]

How is knowing a sources handles doxxing?

this double standard always kind of blew my mind:
-if we don’t know a sources prior handle we demand to know it
-if we find it out/they disclose either on purpose or not we lose our shit they didn’t protect it

Maybe I’m missing something here. But isn’t the POINT of vetting to KNOW shit? If SP got it light and this slipped by isn’t that appropriate to disclose?

none of this considers if this thread is valid or not; simply talking principle here.

Let’s talk principles. You get threatened because of me. I handle the “ threat”.
You say nothing when that punk bitch posted it all out in the open for all to see. How’s that for principles? Shit gets real when you’re in it doesn’t it? Lol

 

[Jsj1]

Yes sir!

mands

I thought so you always gave solid advice there

 

[Regular Joe]

I know its morbid to say it but I'm actually waiting on a couple more family members to pass away before it happens but I've talked to a biographer, an editor and even have a hand shake agreement with a publisher to write a bio of my life story. I guess you can't really call it a life story since the interesting juicy stuff all ends at 32 years old but I've definitely got a sellable story up to that point. Outlaw biker parents, running from the law from state to state. Running from my father from state to state, selling drugs guns and dogs to gangbangers, FBI home invasions, molestations, stabbings, shootings and I could just keep on going on and on and the absolute craziest part of it all is it all happened mainly before I even turned 30 and then at 32 I stepped away from everything and started over fresh with a second chance. in a world away from the one I grew up in where no one knew who I was or where I had come from. I promise if and when it ever gets put onto paper I'll find a way to get you a copy.

So were you molested is the good way or bad way, ie did your uncle suck you off or pound your ass? Unless you meant you were the one doing the molesting in which case we don't want you here

 

[biggerben69]

Yes sir!

mands

You got 'em star struck, partner. Do you remember when I had you as my special guest expert back on SG? My stock went up after that without question. Unfortunately the universe is always seeking homeostasis which meant your slumming had to have some heads shaking in disappointment?
We go back a ways...any enemies of mine should be aware I've got some heavy hitters in my corner...tell 'em mands!

 

[desertwarrior]

@Mac11wildcat you are completely right about the double standard. I can’t argue on that point one bit.

My take on it is this. We want to know who we’re dealing with in a source and to also make sure they don’t self promote. So we selfishly ask for their previous handle. However that information can often lead to times a source wasn’t as security minded. Things may have been posted that could lead back to them. Then we get nervous and attack because they didn’t keep it close to the chest. Those are just member enforced rules though to be fair.

Millards rules don’t allow doxxing. I’d say with the details available in Xkawns posting history an argument could be made. I mean ffs the feds could contact Kandypen with a timeframe from his posting and some geographical information and have a very short list on their hands. Feds go down that list and see who has priors. I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this.

 

[Villain]

@Mac11wildcat you are completely right about the double standard. I can’t argue on that point one bit.

My take on it is this. We want to know who we’re dealing with in a source and to also make sure they don’t self promote. So we selfishly ask for their previous handle. However that information can often lead to times a source wasn’t as security minded. Things may have been posted that could lead back to them. Then we get nervous and attack because they didn’t keep it close to the chest. Those are just member enforced rules though to be fair.

Millards rules don’t allow doxxing. I’d say with the details available in Xkawns posting history an argument could be made. I mean ffs the feds could contact Kandypen with a timeframe from his posting and some geographical information and have a very short list on their hands. Feds go down that list and see who has priors. I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this.

Public info isn’t doxxing any way you try to spin it.

 

[Mac11wildcat]

@Mac11wildcat you are completely right about the double standard. I can’t argue on that point one bit.

My take on it is this. We want to know who we’re dealing with in a source and to also make sure they don’t self promote. So we selfishly ask for their previous handle. However that information can often lead to times a source wasn’t as security minded. Things may have been posted that could lead back to them. Then we get nervous and attack because they didn’t keep it close to the chest. Those are just member enforced rules though to be fair.

Millards rules don’t allow doxxing. I’d say with the details available in Xkawns posting history an argument could be made. I mean ffs the feds could contact Kandypen with a timeframe from his posting and some geographical information and have a very short list on their hands. Feds go down that list and see who has priors. I’m sure you can see where I’m going with this.

I guess it’s interpretation.

If someone voluntarily posts this sort of info and then goes into sourcing *shrug*

At the end of the day, a source outing themselves is really the least risk possible here. LE usually goes up, never heard of them going after a few vials to a customer.

 

[mands]

How is knowing a sources handles doxxing?

this double standard always kind of blew my mind:
-if we don’t know a sources prior handle we demand to know it
-if we find it out/they disclose either on purpose or not we lose our shit they didn’t protect it

Maybe I’m missing something here. But isn’t the POINT of vetting to KNOW shit? If SP got it light and this slipped by isn’t that appropriate to disclose?

none of this considers if this thread is valid or not; simply talking principle here.

Did you not read this whole thread. Stanford was Vetted. Just because the newcomers didn’t see it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. You can PM if you ever have question. This jack off @Rapier could of took 10 seconds and asked a Vet here if his detective work was right or wrong. The thing is his intentions wasn’t about vetting sources. It was about being butt hurt about something that happened to him personally.

I thought so you always gave solid advice there

Thanks man. I’ve always tried to do so. Glad to have you over here.

You got 'em star struck, partner. Do you remember when I had you as my special guest expert back on SG? My stock went up after that without question. Unfortunately the universe is always seeking homeostasis which meant your slumming had to have some heads shaking in disappointment?
We go back a ways...any enemies of mine should be aware I've got some heavy hitters in my corner...tell 'em mands!

Haha big man. All true and always have to do some slumming. Lately been doing my share. Always a pleasure Big B.

mands

 

[Jsj1]

Did you not read this whole thread. Stanford was Vetted. Just because the newcomers didn’t see it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. You can PM if you ever have question. This jack off @Rapier could of took 10 seconds and asked a Vet here if his detective work was right or wrong. The thing is his intentions wasn’t about vetting sources. It was about being butt hurt about something that happened to him personally.

Thanks man. I’ve always tried to do so. Glad to have you over here.

Haha big man. All true and always have to do slumming. Lately been doing my share. Always a pleasure Big B.

mands

Thanks been looking for a home found meso awhile ago left steroid world when all the crazy shit happened had no idea thw detective lived behind my house

 

[bigpoppachump2]

So were you molested is the good way or bad way, ie did your uncle suck you off or pound your ass? Unless you meant you were the one doing the molesting in which case we don't want you here

Idk what do you think asshole? I'm not gonna entertain your bullshit post any further than this one post but yeah motherfucker I was on the recieving side and yes it was my uncle and unfortunately he wasnt the only one. And why would you even come at someone like that who went thg through that shit by throwing insults towards that person saying "did he pound your asshole?" The fuck is wrong with you?

 

[jJjburton]

Idk what do you think asshole? I'm not gonna entertain your bullshit post any further than this one post but yeah motherfucker I was on the recieving side and yes it was my uncle and unfortunately he wasnt the only one. And why would you even come at someone like that who went thg through that shit by throwing insults towards that person saying "did he pound your asshole?" The fuck is wrong with you?

Its cause he’s internet tough guy. In real life. He’d never, or you would destroy him. It’s pathetic when someone can hide behind a screen.

 

[jJjburton]

Idk what do you think asshole? I'm not gonna entertain your bullshit post any further than this one post but yeah motherfucker I was on the recieving side and yes it was my uncle and unfortunately he wasnt the only one. And why would you even come at someone like that who went thg through that shit by throwing insults towards that person saying "did he pound your asshole?" The fuck is wrong with you?

It’s to bad, you couldn’t be face to face with him saying that.

 

[justanoob]

@Rapier I’m gonna throw my name in the hat of dudes who hope your teeth get knocked out.

 

[justanoob]

It’s to bad, you couldn’t be face to face with him saying that.

Keyboard warriors never say shit like that in person. He’d compliment the guy on his big muscles and ask “how much can you bench”

 

[desertwarrior]

As much a I hate bringing this up.

I once made the mistake of mentioning seeing a member on IG I didn’t even share the @ and this happened...

start at page 151

PRIME-PHARMA


Half the members here were threatening my safety. Now a guy basically straight up snitches an we’re just giving a pass? Doesn’t seem right.

 

[mands]

As much a I hate bringing this up.

I once made the mistake of mentioning seeing a member on IG I didn’t even share the @ and this happened...

start at page 151

PRIME-PHARMA


Half the members here were threatening my safety. Now a guy basically straight up snitches an we’re just giving a pass? Doesn’t seem right.

I don’t think he’s getting a pass. He’s being looked into I can assure that.

And you could of mentioned the situation without posting the link. Just more info for someone to look into.

mands

 

[Mac11wildcat]

Half the members here were threatening my safety.

this is my absolute biggest gripe with this place, that this shit happens regularly. That sort of thing shouldn’t be used to gauge how appropriate the response to another situation is.