Stanford Pharma aka SP = Meso Member Xkawn

[Mac11wildcat]

Rapier is here for another agenda, clearly

I’m here cuz I want to fuck your bitch but I have proof she’s cheating. What do you do?

The agenda will be discovered and handled, it always is. Nobody actually cares about the weed and guns (well the gun thing is actually pretty significant but fuck it, because as I keep saying, sources don’t get busted to then have cops chase down customers), drop the personal attacks and feelings.

what was presented was a gap in a freedom we have here in a “unmoderated” board to decide who is (and isn’t) good enough to sell us “illegal drugs” (looking at a specific few of you...) because some of us give a shit about doing this safely.

some of you guys sound like crack addicts, having zero expectation for a source like it couldn’t kill you.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Rapier is here for another agenda, clearly

Nothing gets by you. The question is do his motivations change the present facts?

If he said he was Big Bear and pissed off over the fact that we pound him relentlessly and let Stan virtually have a free pass, would it really change anything?

 

[Brawny]

@Rapier

Do you have a link to the original @StanfordPharma thread? Where he was not vetted properly?

Inquiring minds would like to see it

 

[BigBaldBeardGuy]

Yea after years of doing this and thousands of pages in his thread , tons of customers , .... have you ordered from him before ?

So he shows you pictures of some stuff , what say that’s not a internet search or a lab he works at for a day Job . So someone test gear , they send a vial .... what says they don’t only make enough for a few vials get it tested then sell / send ya underdosed gear that makes them a better profit . Please tell me that !!!! I think you should look in the mirror and put the blue ribbon on you retarded fuk . Could care less about guns or weed , I’m the one making a decision to order from a source not him .

I think you’re missing the point that we typically do “vetting” on a new source out in the open. This wasn’t done for Stanny and it’s come out that is was kinda sorta done but behind the scenes.

Btw, other startup sources have done bullshit lab pics off the Internet and guess what, putting it thru google image search can find that.

And yes, they can brew up their “perfect brew” for samples and then shit-dose customer orders. But that’s why we always ask for a testing credit/incentive for members that are inclined to also submit samples. If the UGLs samples don’t match up with the members results then we start flinging feces.

We’ve been rather consistent with the vetting process for about 2 years now.

 

[mands]

@Rapier

Do you have a link to the original @StanfordPharma thread? Where he was not vetted properly?

Inquiring minds would like to see it

I just looked at it today. Here you go.

Stanford Pharmaceuticals

mands

 

[Brawny]

I just looked at it today. Here you go.

Stanford Pharmaceuticals

mands

Thank you

 

[muscletrain]

I think you’re missing the point that we typically do “vetting” on a new source out in the open. This wasn’t done for Stanny and it’s come out that is was kinda sorta done but behind the scenes.

Btw, other startup sources have done bullshit lab pics off the Internet and guess what, putting it thru google image search can find that.

And yes, they can brew up their “perfect brew” for samples and then shit-dose customer orders. But that’s why we always ask for a testing credit/incentive for members that are inclined to also submit samples. If the UGLs samples don’t match up with the members results then we start flinging feces.

We’ve been rather consistent with the vetting process for about 2 years now.

I honestly don't understand this attitude they either have to be SP customers or like who approaches shit you inject into your body with the lackadaisical attitude of getting uppity at people asking for some verification that you're on the up and up especially after some random dude malicious or not pointed out some very glaring issues.

Yeah people want to see Stanford's lab photos like every other source posts, no one gives a shit that he has filled "10,000" orders or whatever that guy said, great so he must have an insane setup and not a double wide trailer covered in tin foil right? This is the one point I will hammer home, he can and should be able to dispel this EASILY since he's so successful and has made more than enough to buy a very nice setup.

So far he has totally avoided any and all of the questions about this only replying with the lab is too far to take a photo, and has not even committed with a "I'll get some photos". It's pretty damn clear he is not or does not want to show his setup for *some* reason.

I'll say it again:

1) Avoided answering questions about air filtration and negative pressure
2) Avoided posting photos of his lab setup because it's "too far" and did not even commit to a "I'll grab some photos later". It's just a non-answer or avoidance. Like what the fuck kind of person who prides himself on "my reputation speaks for itself" would not get some damn photos when he's under assault for that same reputation that he prides so much because he doesn't wanna hop in the car.

 

[Mac11wildcat]

I honestly don't understand this attitude they either have to be SP customers or like who approaches shit you inject into your body with the lackadaisical attitude of getting uppity at people asking for some verification that you're on the up and up especially after some random dude malicious or not pointed out some very glaring issues.

Yeah people want to see Stanford's lab photos like every other source posts, no one gives a shit that he has filled "10,000" orders or whatever that guy said, great so he must have an insane setup and not a double wide trailer covered in tin foil right? This is the one point I will hammer home, he can and should be able to dispel this EASILY since he's so successful and has made more than enough to buy a very nice setup.

So far he has totally avoided any and all of the questions about this only replying with the lab is too far to take a photo?

Think you quoted the wrong guy but...

Thanks for that @mands. First pages pretty much void of vetting and full of GTGs.

 

[Brawny]

I honestly don't understand this attitude they either have to be SP customers or like who approaches shit you inject into your body with the lackadaisical attitude of getting uppity at people asking for some verification that you're on the up and up especially after some random dude malicious or not pointed out some very glaring issues.

Yeah people want to see Stanford's lab photos like every other source posts, no one gives a shit that he has filled "10,000" orders or whatever that guy said, great so he must have an insane setup and not a double wide trailer covered in tin foil right? This is the one point I will hammer home, he can and should be able to dispel this EASILY since he's so successful and has made more than enough to buy a very nice setup.

So far he has totally avoided any and all of the questions about this only replying with the lab is too far to take a photo, and has not even committed with a "I'll get some photos". It's pretty damn clear he is not or does not want to show his setup for *some* reason.

And as for the partner handling the emails? How trustworthy is that guy? We’ve seen sources in the past where they were rolled on by someone in the know

*cough* Private Label *cough*

 

[muscletrain]

I just looked at it today. Here you go.

Stanford Pharmaceuticals

mands

Well that clears it up folks I'm convinced, a drawer full of finished vials was his intro thread. Good find @mands

If someone posted that intro today people would crucify you, a bunch of text and a relatively small amount of vials in a drawer dude was g2g from day 1.

 

[mands]

Well that clears it up folks I'm convinced, a drawer full of finished vials was his intro thread. Good find @mands

As you can see I come in on post #95 and ask the question and that's the last time I posted I believe.

mands

 

[Test_Subject]

I just looked at it today. Here you go.

Stanford Pharmaceuticals

mands

Wow, the first page is really something. I hope Stan at least gave people the reach-around as a reward for selling him their dignity.

Brrrr, it's shilly.

 

[Mighty-mouse]

@MightyMouse @BigBaldBeardGuy

Is that a proper way to cap? I only tag you guys because I've read your posts on it and you both have a better understanding then I do.

Making a test batch to test for potency maybe.... but for making caps to sell to customers with a labeled mg per pill .... fuck no

I was just wondering if the simplified method he's using would be consistent. The posts I've read from @MightyMouse had me drooling on myself and smoke coming out of my ears. Lol

Consistency is the key when making batches the way he is doing it will not be consistent batch to batch.

Members have done labs on my caps and my 50mg caps were within a few milligrams. My method i got from a pharmaceutical write up. I don't care if a poster with an agenda says he doesn't think my method is bunk. It's a true pharmaceutical method.

I have yet to read all of it but the first screen shot I read is very incorrect. Name a pharmaceutical company that does this.

I’m at the gym right now but I will tear your method you posted to pieces tonight after I settle down pour up a glass of tequila and eat.

You lost all pharmaceutical pill knowledge of batch making when u put all your filler in at the same time then add you whole active. - if that’s how I read it.

Like I said you can have one batch that may test around the dose you labeled but the next batch will def be off and not only that the pill dose itself could be inconsistent in the same batch...... do you use a tamping method too?

 

[BigBaldBeardGuy]

I honestly don't understand this attitude they either have to be SP customers or like who approaches shit you inject into your body with the lackadaisical attitude of getting uppity at people asking for some verification that you're on the up and up especially after some random dude malicious or not pointed out some very glaring issues.

Yeah people want to see Stanford's lab photos like every other source posts, no one gives a shit that he has filled "10,000" orders or whatever that guy said, great so he must have an insane setup and not a double wide trailer covered in tin foil right? This is the one point I will hammer home, he can and should be able to dispel this EASILY since he's so successful and has made more than enough to buy a very nice setup.

So far he has totally avoided any and all of the questions about this only replying with the lab is too far to take a photo, and has not even committed with a "I'll get some photos". It's pretty damn clear he is not or does not want to show his setup for *some* reason.

I'll say it again:

1) Avoided answering questions about air filtration and negative pressure
2) Avoided posting photos of his lab setup because it's "too far" and did not even commit to a "I'll grab some photos later". It's just a non-answer or avoidance. Like what the fuck kind of person who prides himself on "my reputation speaks for itself" would not get some damn photos when he's under assault for that same reputation that he prides so much because he doesn't wanna hop in the car.

I mean.... I guess we can save ourselves the effort of vetting sources. Guys are gonna order and we can’t stop them or make the source go away.

Sorry @BigBearLabs @FirePharm @BiggestAmigos @Beligas Rep @TheAnabolicStore
And what the hell, why the fuck not
@canadianb420 come back and get a better shake.

 

[muscletrain]

Wow, the first page is really something. I hope Stan at least gave people the reach-around as a reward for selling him their dignity.

Brrrr, it's shilly.

The fuck kind of intro was that I scrolled through a few pages

"the purchase of the 5 tren a buys you in as a life long customer. i will remain private." I wasn't around back then but reading through the lines or should I say lines up dudes felatting him and it starts looking weirder and weirder.

fucking 5 tren a membership fee but he is still "private" on the launch of that thread.

Now I see what the OP was talking about, MLI literally got shit canned for exactly how stanford got started people rushing his thread and giving the thumbs up on the first page with his one photo of some unlabeled vials in a drawer jesus.

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

Making a test batch to test for potency maybe.... but for making caps to sell to customers with a labeled mg per pill .... fuck no



Consistency is the key when making batches the way he is doing it will not be consistent batch to batch.



I have yet to read all of it but the first screen shot I read is very incorrect. Name a pharmaceutical company that does this.

I’m at the gym right now but I will tear your method you posted to pieces tonight after I settle down pour up a glass of tequila and eat.

You lost all pharmaceutical pill knowledge of batch making when u put all your filler in at the same time then add you whole active. - if that’s how I read it.

Like I said you can have one batch that may test around the dose you labeled but the next batch will def be off and not only that the pill dose itself could be inconsistent in the same batch...... do you use a tamping method too?

Thats not how i do it. I put all active ingredient and an equal amount of filler and mix. Then add another equal amount, etc until all mixed.

 

[oceanus99]

I went through the screenshots and maybe the first 7 pages of the thread. Is the main premise for OP's argument that their labels look similar therefore SP is Xkawn?

Let me know if I missed some other mind blowing connection between the two.

 

[muscletrain]

I went through the screenshots and maybe the first 7 pages of the thread. Is the main premise for OP's argument that their labels look similar therefore SP is Xkawn?

Let me know if I missed some other mind blowing connection between the two.

Yeah you missed the part where Stan literally admits it is him lol.

 

[Mac11wildcat]

I went through the screenshots and maybe the first 7 pages of the thread. Is the main premise for OP's argument that their labels look similar therefore SP is Xkawn?

Let me know if I missed some other mind blowing connection between the two.

I normally think I comprehended the whole 25 page thread from one original post too.

the claims been confirmed. Please go back and read...

 

[oceanus99]

Yeah you missed the part where Stan literally admits it is him lol.

Just went backwards in the thread and reached that point lol. Thanks.