STANFORD PHARMA. DOMESTIC US. OPEN TO PUBLIC.

Or this is possibly another incarnation of CdnGay
Would not be surprised if that's the case. Both Morefyah and CdnGay have some serious personality disorders it appears.

Cdn has had many nicks and I remember Seattle23 was his craziest incarnation.
 
I truly believe there was no malicious intent from Stanford on my order. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially when it comes to black market gear. More than likely there was an issue with the old raws and Stanford has informed me that the new batch of Test E is from new raws. This was my first order with Stanford and I did my due diligence before placing said order.

He is making it right for me and replacing the batch I got a couple of months ago. That speaks volumes. Again, I believe the issue is with that batch’s raws and not with Stanford himself. I’m going to do what I can to have that batch tested, however that is not indicative of underdosed gear from any other batch, only the one I received.
This is why I personally believe each batch of new raws a UGL receives should be tested prior to new product being made from it. It would require a little more effort on the UGL’s part; ordering raws earlier and sending them out for testing while still compounding with prior raws that have been tested until results arrive. Nevertheless, it would put an end to people wasting weeks on cycle until they receive mid cycle bloods and find out the raws were bad. Its not the money thats an issue, its the wasted time. Just my 2 cents.
 
But Stan said in the post announcing the sale that everything currently brewed is from the batch of Raws he had already tested. So if that is the truth then the theory of a new poor batch wouldn’t make sense, so something definitely doesn’t add up here.
If thats the case somethings definitely weird. I’m not pointing fingers but I couldn’t imagine incorrectly compounded Test from stan i figured it was the raws (which should be tested.)
 
Labs are still shit. Just not as shitty as earlier. So over it. Lol

Thanks for sharing bud!
The test e, which I've branded as test300, is mostly test cyp. At 4 weeks i doubt the test cyp is at full level. I would argue the labs being "shit" at this stage in his cycle.
 
The test e, which I've branded as test300, is mostly test cyp. At 4 weeks i doubt the test cyp is at full level. I would argue the labs being "shit" at this stage in his cycle.
Bi weekly dosing has consistantly shown to produce significantly lower total t than single weekly dosing. So I wouldnt say shit at all, you just cant compare the two.
 
Back
Top