SymBiotics (U.S. domestic)

^^^^^ Well there you go new guys, a fellow new guy is giving it a “definitely gtg!” This guy is totally anonymous and you don’t know him at all but he’s happy and excited. That’s swell. [emoji58]

@MTWulf I know you probably got the bonerzzz feelzzz and gainzzz report but nobody gives a “gtg” here. Take that back to BoP or ASF. That’s not done here. If you want to be constructive send a product sample in. The lab report means more than your anonymous “gtg”.

A source is only as good as his last batch and you’re putting your reputation on the line here. Don’t do that. Plenty of sources have come and gone. Your “gtg” could come back to haunt you.

Damn, what a dick. Jeeze
3BG2
 
Damn, what a dick. Jeeze
3BG2

[emoji2369] What was dickish about it?

The guy was a member in 2008 - he thinks.

He completely forgets what his old handle was.

He’s in here giving it a GTG based on the bonerzzz and feelzzz and gainzzz report after 2 pins.

The new guys are annoying enough as it is. Imagine if we allowed them to lick and cradle every sources balls here.

MESO not BoP.
 
View attachment 126275 Completely blind sample of @SymBiotics Primo E 200. I withheld posting a TD or PIP report so the tester I used wouldn't see anything posted publicly.

I was concerned about the EO as the base carrier, but every injection so far has went extremely smooth. This carrier had been better than my other sources Primo using MCT. Also communication has been top notch with great packaging.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: T&H
[emoji2369] What was dickish about it?

The guy was a member in 2008 - he thinks.

He completely forgets what his old handle was.

He’s in here giving it a GTG based on the bonerzzz and feelzzz and gainzzz report after 2 pins.

The new guys are annoying enough as it is. Imagine if we allowed them to lick and cradle every sources balls here.
;);)
MESO not BoP.

Man I thought you would have known I was just kidding. I thought you knew me better than that my fellow bearded brother. Sorry. Guess I should have thrown a couple wink emojis in there! ;););)

@bolder I failed.
 
Man I thought you would have known I was just kidding. I thought you knew me better than that my fellow bearded brother. Sorry. Guess I should have thrown a couple wink emojis in there! ;););)

@bolder I failed.

I knew. Most of the regulars knew.

But remember the 1st quarter 2020 membership drive was apparently a wild success because there’s A LOT of knew people here. And they don’t know. Can’t let them get away with the source-riding! [emoji12][emoji12][emoji12]
 
I looked into jano and found this thread here where people don't think too highly of him:

Jano "The ultimate Con-man and Liar?" thread...You be the judge

I think it would be helpful to try to not repeat this same conversation over again. I paid money and typed thousands of words back and forth during the process of documenting a "head-to-head" comparison of analytical services.
Two samples were submitted to each of two analytical services; and the results were near identical.
Both chemists correctly identified the compounds and their concentrations/purity.
Please see post #4125
I don't know why I can't link it here.

In the big picture, I see it like this:
Everyone here has read every good and bad encounter that has been posted with all the UGLs and testers. The commonly regurgitated phrase "a UGL is only as good as their last batch or a chemist is only as good as their last test" is almost wasted verbiage in my opinion; in that, the same thing is true of ANY service in any realm of commerce.
I remember once, years ago, KFC had some issue with the "Original Recipe" and people didn't like it, or something to that effect-------this afternoon the KFC in my town was standing room only with some high school buses parked outside.
Peter Pan peanut butter was recalled a few years ago because of E. coli contamination------the store in my town runs out of it regularly (it's my favorite brand).
There are probably thousands more easily found examples of the "last batch" not being perfect, even from multi-million dollar businesses.

All of this is to say that people with a vested interest in the success of their work will do what is necessary to correct the mistakes that inevitably will be made if they work long enough in the same field. I know that I, personally, promised you all I would make a mistake sooner or later. I cannot expect absolute perfection from myself; so there is no way I would ever expect it from someone else. What I do expect of myself and demand from others is best effort.

It is an alien experience for me here, where positive comments about sources/services are met with disdain, sarcasm, and ridicule; but negative comments about a provider are encouraged and compounded upon by the next poster. In most of the instances where I have read someone presenting an alternative point of view to a negative comment about a UGL or analytical service; that person is given a negative label of "shill" or "dick rider". It just seems so unnecessary to always be so angry:)
I guess I have always tried to surround myself with positivity and always given the next guy the benefit of the doubt until I am certain of wrongdoing without the intent to reconcile.
I know-----I live in a dream world that could probably have only existed many years ago:( But I like to look for the silver linings.

The short version of all this is:
@janoshik and @Labf4Tox were pitted against each other in blind tests and the results were the same.
 
Back
Top