Dieting isn't an area I have a lot of knowledge or experience. Considering that I've been around these parts(the online bb'ing and aas Community) from the start, it would be fair to ask, "wtf are you doing here, then, and why?".
Well, I've got other areas that I'm interested in. I also won't try and pretend that I've got something to offer when I don't. However, my question is about the post I've quoted. Am I correct that Visceral fat is the fat that surrounds our internal organs? If we're talking about spot reducing, are we talking about a drug that reduces Visceral fat specifically? I don't think we are? Its a different KIND of fat. Its not the AREA(pant line) that is being targetted.
My old associate,
@desertwarrior, how have you been? I don't think I've seen you in some time? Good to know you're still doing your thing. As far as your question is concerned. A couple of things I do know about, is the drugs we use and where to get them.
It has been said that when we inject USA Pharmacy Grade Growth Hormone, if we target an area with our daily injections, that area will see accelerated fat loss. I have spoken to some who swear that's the truth. I don't know if its true or not? Its for sure true that overall fat loss is happening at a much faster rate than without the specific GH. Its easier to lose as well.
The member I quoted brought up the latest drug that has taken folks from all walks of life by storm. I don't think its fair to put these drugs in the same group that saw the HCG diet craze and similar. Folks were buying boxes of crap from Walmart believing they were getting in at "Ground Zero". Afterall, the box said HCG and promised success. Unfortunately, the syringe in the box was of the oral variety. We know that real HCG, in order for it to work, needs to be injected. Another waste of money and any weight lost would have been lost by taking in less calories and exercise that should be followed in conjunction with the shit product in that box.
The drugs that the member brought up work. Another discovered after being brought to the market for something other than its being used for now. Diabetes drugs are like that. It was in the realm, its just now we know how its best used.
The visceral fat thing. I explain it by talking about the big fat guy who isn't squishy fat. To the touch, his stomach feels solid? Not so easy on the eyes, though? Maybe he's an anomaly? Maybe there's muscle underneath the skin? Unfortunately for the big guy, that's not the case.
That's the visceral fat. A diet high in saturated bad fats is one reason. He'd be in a better position if his gut was soft and squishy to the touch. He probably isn't long for this world without some drastic changes.
The other example of visceral fat is the HIV patient. For a time, there were HIV cocktails being prescribed, that increased the visceral fat in the patients taking them. Unsightly, yes, but worth the trade as lives were being extended. HIV wasn't the quick death sentence it once was. In the 80's, folks would be given the diagnosis of being infected with HIV, and then within a year or so they were gone.
With the advances in treatment(drugs), you didn't have to be a world class athlete(folks always point to Magic Johnson) or among the Uber Rich to live 5, 10 and 20+ years after that initial diagnosis.
There's a drug that's manufactured by a company called Egrifta. It's marketed by another Big Pharma Company who was smack dab in the middle of the War to against HIV. EMD Serono and its baby, Serostim, was given the nod by the FDA back in the 80's to be the only USA Pharmacy Grade Growth Hormone that would be prescribes to combat the Wasting Syndrome associated with HIV/AIDS.
Egrifta is a GHRP so it made sense to those making the decisions that EMD Serono be given the rights to market the drug, for a fee of course. Some pointed out that Serostim reduces visceral fat on its own? The issue was sugar. Blood sugar. Dr's said Egrifta was less harsh than Serostim when it came to patients. Serostim is snthetic hgh taken by daily injection. Egrifta is a GHRP that increases the users natural output of GH by signaling the pituitary to make more. The GHRP was less liely to cause the user to become diabetic. 18iu's of Serostim will have a tendency to do that. Whereas Egrifta, increasing GH output, isn't pushing the Pituitary to push out anything close to 18iu's a day.
The issue with Egrifta, testing showed that upon putting the drug down, the visceral fat came right back like it never left. Insurance companies were able, in many cases, to have Egrifta labeled as a Cosmetic fix to a problem. Therefore, big insurance companies weren't required to cover the drug. There aren't enough discount coupons to bring the drug in range for most needing or WANTING(insurance companies called it a want not a need) it.
Today, without insurance, a 30 day supply of Egrifta is right around $8,000(depending on the pharmacy). A months worth of Serostim, without insurance is around $20,000(4 126iu kits).
The big difference is Serostim is covered by insurance. Most importantly to those looking to acquire it on the Black Market, Welfare/State Insurance, especially in CA., cover it without batting an eye.
Egrifta, if its not covered, won't make it to the Black Market....and if it did, the price would in most cases, have to cover the cost plus whatever Tax the seller puts on it. Serostim costs many patients nothing. Therefor whatever they can get for it is profit. This is how we can see it sold for $500 to whatever the market will bear.
So, my friend desertwarrior, without bringing up D*P. Thers's something to consider.