CyniQ
New Member
patsfan said:I didnt say I believe just that I am more likely. Bob we can agree to dissagree and thats cool. There is alot more evindece to back up evolution I mean do you think the dinasourse were hanging around 10,000 years ago. Carbon dating IS a science.
If you want you can refer back to "the passion" thread( I think it was that one). Where I argued that you don't have to believe the earth is 6,000 years old to be a "creationist". Carbon dating is thought by many to fall very short in terms of REAL accuracy. "Oh. But its ONLY off by 6 trillion years or so." Whatever. Besides many scientists have found that the rate of radioactive carbon formation in the atmosphere has not been consistent in the past and that this method is not reliable in dating objects from about 2,000 B.C.E. or before.
