tenpoundsleft
Member
Your two posts here, combined with your board name, is it some weird joke?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
The Decline of Western Civilation Continues Unimpeded on College Campuses
- Thread starter CensoredBoardsSuck
- Start date
Your two posts here, combined with your board name, is it some weird joke?
D-Ballin
New Member
The fuck is wrong with you, and what does this have to do with anything going on here? Bigotry at it's finest. Take your anti semetic shit and insert it back where it belongs.
This Jerry clown has been pretty tame so far. Might be an impostor account for Wolfstormer. Check out some WS's ideas. The dude is right out of the Third Reich:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/gun-control-nfw.134369271/page-16#post-1429337
[University of Chicago] Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression
http://provost.uchicago.edu/FOECommitteeReport.pdf
The Committee on Freedom of Expression at the University of Chicago was appointed in July 2014 by President Robert J. Zimmer and Provost Eric D. Isaacs “in light of recent events nationwide that have tested institutional commitments to free and open discourse.” The Committee’s charge was to draft a statement “articulating the University’s overarching commitment to free, robust, and uninhibited debate and deliberation among all members of the University’s community.”
The Committee has carefully reviewed the University’s history, examined events at other institutions, and consulted a broad range of individuals both inside and outside the University. This statement reflects the long-standing and distinctive values of the University of Chicago and affirms the importance of maintaining and, indeed, celebrating those values for the future.
Excerpt:
Of course, the ideas of different members of the University community will often and quite naturally conflict. But it is not the proper role of the University to attempt to shield individuals from ideas and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive. Although the University greatly values civility, and although all members of the University community share in the responsibility for maintaining a climate of mutual respect, concerns about civility and mutual respect can never be used as a justification for closing off discussion of ideas, however offensive or disagreeable those ideas may be to some members of our community.
. . . In a word, the University’s fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the University community to be offensive, unwise, immoral, or wrong-headed. It is for the individual members of the University community, not for the University as an institution, to make those judgments for themselves, and to act on those judgments not by seeking to suppress speech, but by openly and vigorously contesting the ideas that they oppose. Indeed, fostering the ability of members of the University community to engage in such debate and deliberation in an effective and responsible manner is an essential part of the University’s educational mission.
As a corollary to the University’s commitment to protect and promote free expression, members of the University community must also act in conformity with the principle of free expression. Although members of the University community are free to criticize and contest the views expressed on campus, and to criticize and contest speakers who are invited to express their views on campus, they may not obstruct or otherwise interfere with the freedom of others to express views they reject or even loathe. To this end, the University has a solemn responsibility not only to promote a lively and fearless freedom of debate and deliberation, but also to protect that freedom when others attempt to restrict it.
http://provost.uchicago.edu/FOECommitteeReport.pdf
The Committee on Freedom of Expression at the University of Chicago was appointed in July 2014 by President Robert J. Zimmer and Provost Eric D. Isaacs “in light of recent events nationwide that have tested institutional commitments to free and open discourse.” The Committee’s charge was to draft a statement “articulating the University’s overarching commitment to free, robust, and uninhibited debate and deliberation among all members of the University’s community.”
The Committee has carefully reviewed the University’s history, examined events at other institutions, and consulted a broad range of individuals both inside and outside the University. This statement reflects the long-standing and distinctive values of the University of Chicago and affirms the importance of maintaining and, indeed, celebrating those values for the future.
Excerpt:
Of course, the ideas of different members of the University community will often and quite naturally conflict. But it is not the proper role of the University to attempt to shield individuals from ideas and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive. Although the University greatly values civility, and although all members of the University community share in the responsibility for maintaining a climate of mutual respect, concerns about civility and mutual respect can never be used as a justification for closing off discussion of ideas, however offensive or disagreeable those ideas may be to some members of our community.
. . . In a word, the University’s fundamental commitment is to the principle that debate or deliberation may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the University community to be offensive, unwise, immoral, or wrong-headed. It is for the individual members of the University community, not for the University as an institution, to make those judgments for themselves, and to act on those judgments not by seeking to suppress speech, but by openly and vigorously contesting the ideas that they oppose. Indeed, fostering the ability of members of the University community to engage in such debate and deliberation in an effective and responsible manner is an essential part of the University’s educational mission.
As a corollary to the University’s commitment to protect and promote free expression, members of the University community must also act in conformity with the principle of free expression. Although members of the University community are free to criticize and contest the views expressed on campus, and to criticize and contest speakers who are invited to express their views on campus, they may not obstruct or otherwise interfere with the freedom of others to express views they reject or even loathe. To this end, the University has a solemn responsibility not only to promote a lively and fearless freedom of debate and deliberation, but also to protect that freedom when others attempt to restrict it.
How refreshing is that. Couldn't agree more. Thank you for that. Wondering how that will translate into practice in the real world, but a good start nevertheless.
I always found it intriguing that there are highly intelligent people on both sides of major arguments and that none of them considers themselves the bad guy.
step one, recognize that the above is a fact.
step two, consider, study both sides diligently.
step three, form an educated opinion.
Most folks never get past step one, they prefer the relative safety of herd mentality which they tend to acquire at an early age from their already propagandized parents and their state sponsored educators.
PS: this one is for CensoredBoardsSuck
Muslims may be caveman, but Judaism = Gods chosen people destined to inherit the world. (where does that leave the rest of us?)
step one, recognize that the above is a fact.
step two, consider, study both sides diligently.
step three, form an educated opinion.
Most folks never get past step one, they prefer the relative safety of herd mentality which they tend to acquire at an early age from their already propagandized parents and their state sponsored educators.
PS: this one is for CensoredBoardsSuck
Muslims may be caveman, but Judaism = Gods chosen people destined to inherit the world. (where does that leave the rest of us?)
tenpoundsleft
Member
Haven't read anything else that WS has written, but I don't see what's wrong with supporting the 2nd Amendment. Looks like the French could have done with some of that level of freedom - since the lunatics never pay attention to laws anyway.
Jerry's pics with the Magen David tags strike me as way off-base however. On that note, happy early Hannukah!
Fake jews. The real jews are the ones who actually follow Judiasm (Orthodox Jews[the dudes with big beards that follow the Torah]). Just like how Islam got hijacked by these morons in the middle east, judiasm got hijacked by the Zionists. The only difference is that when people attack the name jews everyone will stand up and say anti semetic, but when the name of Muslims is thrashed and attacked, most people dont care or will agree [emoji53].
tenpoundsleft
Member
Well, there is also the minor difference in that no Jews of any variety systematically beheads, rapes, plunders, engages in genocide, blows up bombs, and in general spends their waking moments plotting to kill all on the planet belonging to other faiths. There's always that difference...
Palestine...? Are you blind?
And all people of the planet...? Have you noticed that these terrorists only attack those countries that have that have been in the middle east since the 1980s..? Have you noticed Mexico, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, and many other countries who havent invaded the middle east in large number also have never had consistent terror attacks happened to them...Think about it, we didnt hear the word terrorism being thrown around until after 9/11 but these groups existed decades before. Shit, what about before the 1980s??? The iraq war was never really justified and left a lot of pissed of Iraqis who started to become Anti-American because their country had been destroyed by the same country who put that moron Saddam in charge... This is what led to the creation of all these militant groups. All this violence is occuring because of the war in Iraq. If Russia invaded the USA and killed one of your siblings or your dad by accident/on purpose and 5-6 years later Russia says "oops looks like we were wrong" would you immediately forgive Russia..? I know plenty of soldiers that went overseas and admitted themselves that the Iraq war and Afganistan were retarded and pointless. All it did was create more enemies. Even Bushs brother Jeb refused to answer about what his brother did to Iraq...
I love how you're intentionally ignoring 1400 years of Islamic history. Every civilization the Muslims have come up against - without exception - they've fought. And it continues to this very day in Indonesia, India, Cote d’Ivoire, Cyprus, East Timor, Nigeria, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Russia-Chechnya, Kashmir, Macedonia, Bosnia and Israel - just to name a few. History has shown that wherever Muslims go, conflict follows. So you can save the Islam is a victim and that it's a religion of peace horseshit. No one believes it anymore.
And if you hadn't heard of pre-9/11 Islamic terror, you're either very young or very ignorant.
Huh? Really? Hahaha everywhere it goes war follows [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]. Look at these stats and count up how many were caused by muslims vs non muslims hahaha. I have stats and facts, all you have are ignorant, racist opinions.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll
Yeah! Really! Hahaha. Numbers killed in war has nothing to do with what I said. Try again.
BTW, what race are Muslims again?
It actually does and youre ignoring facts. Christians, atheists, and other groups have caused destruction as well, the fact that you only cry that muslims do it proves youre an Islamaphobe and prejudice (i like how you try to correct the way i use "racist" since its such a small error in what i said, tryna bring up a little problem to divert away from the point im trying to make). People arent perfect just deal with it. There are good and bad everywhere you moron. Stop using a few bad people to represent an entire group of people. And once again add up those statistics for me and show me how many are caused by muslims vs non muslims. Anytime countries go to war its mostly for money and power and they always use religion or some political ideology as an excuse so the majority of the ignorant, "blind" population can back them up.
I didn't say Christians, atheists or anybody else haven't caused destruction. Nor did I say all Muslims were bad, nor did I say there weren't good and bad people everywhere. You're putting words in my mouth. I was countering your point that Muslims are always the victims and never the oppressors, when the reality is just the opposite: Violence has followed Islam throughout history, and it still does as evidenced by the fact that Muslims are currently involved in roughly 95% of the world's armed conflicts. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_military_conflicts
If saying that makes me an Islamophobe (a phony term invented by Islamic supremacists to silence legitimate criticism of Islam), then I'm proud to be one, just as I'm proud to be a kaffir.
CBS
Islamophobe
So if its the opposite Muslims are always the oppressors??? Really? 95% of the armed conflicts??? Wait look at those countries again my friend, most of those countries shown have had Western influence in them. Who caused all those rebellions in the middle east? Who supported the rebels?! That link you posted actually proves another one of my points, thank you. Violence follows islam now because many "muslims" leaders are corrupt and have been basically bribed. Cmon man are the Saudi leaders really Muslim? Was Saddam a good muslim? What about the idiot presidents of afghanistan? Haha where those morons muslim? Most middle eastern countries have corrupt governments which have been set up by others. Also, if you take a look at the map and wind it back to the 1920s-1940s Europe would be the hotspot. And most Europeans are Catholic/Christians but wait...Did any of those wars have to do with any of those religions? NO. Samething now, its just happening on their lands but it has nothing to do with Islam. A better question would be why do most those countries that are hotspots for violence contain the most amount of resources (oil,mining, etc).
Oh yea and if Islamaphobe is a phony term then so is Anti semitism (the word you yourself used an hour ago,Hypocrite) which is essentially the same word for Jews. Stop being so one sided. Why are you so prejudice? Whats with all the hate? How come you are being so hypocritical? Can you please give me
one example that i cant logically answer back to?
Oh yea and if Islamaphobe is a phony term then so is Anti semitism (the word you yourself used an hour ago,Hypocrite) which is essentially the same word for Jews. Stop being so one sided. Why are you so prejudice? Whats with all the hate? How come you are being so hypocritical? Can you please give me
one example that i cant logically answer back to?
I guess the college campus thread has been sacrificed to the Islam-is-evil argument. Too bad, for a while CBS and I were almost in complete agreement in this thread.
You're right, Flenser. This thread actually stayed on topic for quite a while too. @Ahmad90, take your replies to the https://thinksteroids.com/community...es-moving-in-next-to-you-in-the-us.134370516/
Similar threads
