You should know, Jane. You and your boyfriend couldn't even agree on where you're located - the UK or the Czech Republic.
I won't even address the fact that you posted a pic of the wrong mass spec machine when you attempted to defend your forged AAS assay. I suppose 40+ years of humiliation by the Russian bear tends to leave one confused. Carry on, Tоварищ. LMFAO
1. You've never ever talked to my partner and you don't have any knowledge about the partner, as we don't even really work together too much anymore
2. I was never ever in my life in the UK.
3. I did not ever post a picture of any mass spectrometer on this forum. You probably have one chromosome extra, but well, I'll take my time with you.
4. The pictures were posted by xupc, who contacted me regarding the testing.
5. It's not a mass spec, not like uneducated prick like you would ever know the difference.
6. He literally posted "It should be noted that the spectofotometry machine outputs blinking numbers (they look like this http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/deki/files/8472/Spc20Blnk.gif) that you"
So the guy posts AN EXAMPLE MACHINE FROM WIKIPEDIA. A PICTURE OF EXAMPLE OF SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC MACHINE - SO YOU CAN SEE IT FIRST TIME IN YOUR LIFE.
LITERALLY THE FIRST PICTURE THAT GOOGLE PROBABLY SPAT OUT.
7. CBS (cretinous bullshit spammer) and JIM think that's my lab WHILE IT WAS NEVER STATED SO BY ANYBODY BUT HIM AND JIM. It takes a special kind of retard to think that and to think that my lab is on wikipedia, haha.
8. ALSO, Cretinous Bullshit Spammer proves he is retarded again in this mere post:
UK GENTECH LABS where he shows he is even uncabable of understanding the DATE system.
9. I don't think I have to add I was never associated with the lab and never supported it, just stood past my results. If anybody can find anywhere where I shilled for this lab I'll send him a cookie.
There are also other GEMS to be found in that thread from JIM, like:
"Sorry mate but although PHOTOSPEC or GS/MS are quite useful to identify sample compounds NONE are capable of sample QUANTIFICATION!" - no comment, just lol
"You just can't slam all that crap into a Spec and obtain results, the constituents MUST first be isolated into individual compounds and then run SEPARATELY." - he seems to no have ever heard of chromatography being a separation technique, haha
"If you just run an oil with the BA, NaB, Tren-A and a monoglyceride in a MS the fragments will form dimers trimers and sodium adducts for sure. Now that's excluding any other adulterants EVERY UGL uses in their formulation.
How odd is it NO sodium adducts or adulterants were detected, only those substances that were likely listed on the vial labeling.." - sodium in oils? where exactly? you put table salt in your injectables JIM? that would explain a lot of stuff going on with your brain
Chemistry 101, failed again by JIM.
Do you want me to quote him in another thread, where he says the MS is awesome for quantitation?
Or do you want me to quote you about 500000 publications from REAL SCIENTISTS unlike JIM, who USE MS for Uv/VIS for quantitation?
Come at this you little a-hole, I'll enjoy it.
It's cool that you got a pic with JIM, which one it who?
Totally ignored that, didn't he? I suppose we should cut Jane some slack though. The poor boy can't even decide if he's in the UK or Czech Republic so getting tripped up by posting the wrong mass spec machine seems understandable. Lmao
See up, little doggie.
Wow how profound!
The most reliable QUAlITATIVE assay is one that evaluates the SUM OF A MOLECULAR STRUCTURES PARTS, while
the most reliable QUANTITATIVE assay evaluates a molecular structures components separately IF POSSIBLE!
Of course I don't expect you to understand or appreciate those words but that JANEO is CHEMISTRY 101,
something YOU never learned OTJ, lol!
Try forming a coherent sentence you uneducated fuck.
What you wrote is mess both gramatically both factually and has no basis in truth.
Forming coherent sentences is kinda a requirement to get into and pass the med school, which again makes me wonder...
The only people that should be embarrassed are the people trying to dismantle this testing.
If you aren't happy, start a new thread and do it YOUR FUCKING SELF!
I'll make a thread saying you are dickless... And don't you dare to post there! If you disagree measure your dick by YOURSELF and START A NEW THREAD. Or better off LEAVE.
Then why have you been leading the pack criticizing every one of
our GH threads but have absolutely no problem supporting less than convincing HPLCS from a empiric perspective on PM?
Let me tell you I've literally bent over backwards trying to appease your request for "proof"
on ALL of our GH threads yet you
remain a defiant naysayer upon departure.
The data is faulty, the datas not accurate bla, bla, bla. No way I could make those statements on PM about YOUR HPLCS but on Meso since it's allowable, you more than anyone, abuse the privilege of visiting an uncensored board!
And kid yourself not many Meso members see the hypocrisy in your actions rather than believe in such words of BB protectionism.
Heck I've posted more evidence in one sample on that second thread than you and Janoe have done with FIVE HPLCS,
but your partly line remained the same, BAD DATA.
So yea "we" need to test but can only "trust" MH, some tech with a refurbished HPLC and data on PM, right!
>5 hplcs
JIM being at it in maths again.
Also your evidence... I don't know, it kinda lacks the 'evidence' part.
Also MY LINE WAS NOT BAD DATA. I am not as retarded to claim that without ANY EVIDENCE - SOMETHING WHAT YOU DO ALL THE TIME (which makes you a retard I guess?).
My line is that you are a liar and an uneducated ass.
Something for you, Mr. JIM again, as you keep forgetting to respond to this:
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
Also, the HPLC is brand new, thank you.
Poor Janeo still can't see the forest thru the trees can you, bc the difference, the PHD I've spoken with on many occasions is not only considered an expert in the field of laboratory science, he also ensures the requirements for certification are maintained.
So who is in charge of "YOUR LAB" Janeo, YOU, God forbid.
Now who is being "pretentious" fool!
Sorry, can't hear you, just got off the phone with Mr. President.
Don't fuck with Dr JIm. Just don't fucking do it okay.
He cries in his sleep because of that?