Doc I thought you insinuated you weren't going to post any more data . I must have misunderstood you
No problem bc I posted a similar reply to @Mr.B66 several days ago and many didn't see it Im sure bc of the "banter"!
The testing done on PM was done by donation from the members with everything to be posted in the private lab testing forum that requires 50 posts to view. This section was created when Big A and Raj did the first lab tests on PM roughly 6 years ago. At the time it was created it was disclosed that anybody that removes anything from this section and posts it on another board will be permanently banned. Big A didn't want people who bitch and whine about how bad PM is to then hypocritically come and steal the information for their own use. I completely understand his reasoning and agree that if the members who paid for these tests choose not share it with others, than that is their right. However, even if I disagreed it would not matter because I don't have any say in the matter. You can sit here and complain to me all you want and keep telling me to post things, but I have no special powers. What you are asking me to do just isn't possible and I don't understand why you guys don't get it.
Secondly you are focusing on a complete diversion. The testing on PM is not what this thread is about. This thread is about determining what the contents are of various vials of GH. I have argued with Jim's prior testing for good reasons and this was before we had even done any testing on PM. This isn't about comparing PM versus Meso to see who is king of the hill. Jesus christ, what is wrong with you people? This is about getting things right. You have guys praising pharma GH and talking about how horrible generic GH is and ironically you have pharma GH at an affordable price staring you in the face and you guys are too fucking stupid to realize it.
Just more deflection bc no where have you highlighted an error in this data.
And I suspect part of the reason is your inability to understand the evidence before you, bc if that was the case you wouldn't have to mentioned; a GH thread conducted over one year ago, my motives for conducting "illegal testing", Pharma as the optimal standard, or comparing my data to yours, the latter being a literal unknown which is NOT available for public scrutiny (how convenient) etc, etc, etc.
The fact IS when you relied upon phantom data to compare to mine, and thereafter declared; "Jims data can not possibly be accurate", the former very much becomes an relevant point of discovery whether you like it or not. Stated another way; if you can't back it up don't bring it up!
In addition if you would have asked questions like anyone else who was truly interested, rather than taking pot shots at these assays, things might have been different, and heck MH you might have actually learned a thing or two "outside the gym".
But I always suspected the critical you would surface and that's exactly what happened, and that's a shame but it is what it is.