THE new "Generic" HGH Assay PAGE! AAA testing

[Sdryx]

It's like arguing about god. Emotions will never equal DATA. The argument will never end. It's important to point out who is basing their belief on emotions and who is basing it on scientific data.

I think it is clear who is who here.

 

[muscle96ss]

I don't know I just thought if there is any way to get both of them satisfied..
Or it will never end..
It was just a thought that this will end..

Jim doesn't care about accuracy or answers. At the very beginning of the testing, you had the guy responsible for bringing the grey tops to the market; here willing to participate and get to the bottom of this. He was run off because of the way he was treated. Jim has shown time and time again, he is incapable of having a technical, meaningful discussion. Just look at yesterday where Jano presented a bunch of information in regards to glycine that proved him wrong. He has yet to respond to any of that. And he won't because all he is capable of doing is deflecting the conversation over to attacks on myself or PM. Just look at every other post in this thread; its Jim, CBS, or rpbb talking about me. I haven't seen CBS or rpbb contribute a single piece of useful knowledge about the actual topic. In the meantime, we keep hearing that pharma samples are going to be tested, but that doesn't seem to be happening either; kinda odd.

 

[janoshik]

Yes, it truly is interesting how JIM had time to post quite a lot, but ignores any posts where facts are thrown into his face.

THE new "Generic" HGH Assay PAGE! AAA testing Just a remainder of the last unanswered post.

It's like arguing about god. Emotions will never equal DATA. The argument will never end. It's important to point out who is basing their belief on emotions and who is basing it on scientific data.

I think it is clear who is who here.

There, I could not express myself better, thank you.

 

[Sdryx]

Yes, it truly is interesting how JIM had time to post quite a lot, but ignores any posts where facts are thrown into his face.

THE new "Generic" HGH Assay PAGE! AAA testing Just a remainder of the last unanswered post.




There, I could not express myself better, thank you.

Don't fucking quote me. I'm NOT on your side.

 

[janoshik]

The quote fits, nevertheless.

Also, don't get too upset little doggie.

 

[rpbb]

Jim doesn't care about accuracy or answers. At the very beginning of the testing, you had the guy responsible for bringing the grey tops to the market; here willing to participate and get to the bottom of this. He was run off because of the way he was treated. Jim has shown time and time again, he is incapable of having a technical, meaningful discussion. Just look at yesterday where Jano presented a bunch of information in regards to glycine that proved him wrong. He has yet to respond to any of that. And he won't because all he is capable of doing is deflecting the conversation over to attacks on myself or PM. Just look at every other post in this thread; its Jim, CBS, or rpbb talking about me. I haven't seen CBS or rpbb contribute a single piece of useful knowledge about the actual topic. In the meantime, we keep hearing that pharma samples are going to be tested, but that doesn't seem to be happening either; kinda odd.

You've provided zero useful information

 

[Mr.B66]

Don't fucking quote me. I'm NOT on your side.

Its sad that there are "sides" i thought we were all in this together , for the same reasons. As long as we have "sides" this will ALWAYS be the outcome.

 

[Sdryx]

There is data vs people's "emotions" here is all I can see. People don't want to accept the data.

Let's take Jim out of this. If you think the DATA is not right. Then conduct YOUR OWN tests, make your own thread and let the DATA speak for itself!

 

[Dr JIM]

Yes, it truly is interesting how JIM had time to post quite a lot, but ignores any posts where facts are thrown into his face.

THE new "Generic" HGH Assay PAGE! AAA testing Just a remainder of the last unanswered post.




There, I could not express myself better, thank you.

And what do any of your foolish questions have to do with these ASSAYS ------- NOT A DAMN THING

And that's WHY I "don't answer" clown!

Oh but my "unanswered posts" like the standard you didn't use for your "snot is ok" HPLCS, GTFOOH.

 

[PrideofNYC123]

And what do any of your foolish questions have to do with these ASSAYS ------- NOT A DAMN THING

And that's WHY I "don't answer" clown!

Oh but my "unanswered posts" like the standard you didn't use for your snot is ok HPLCS, GTFOOH.

He directly addressed the glycine question. That is directly related to the assays.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[heady muscle]

Its sad that there are "sides" i thought we were all in this together , for the same reasons. As long as we have "sides" this will ALWAYS be the outcome.

Exactly and well said.

 

[Dr JIM]

He directly addressed the glycine question. That is directly related to the assays.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NOT!

Bc whether glycine is used as a BUFFER, as a means of raising Tonicity or GH levels, etc it doesn't effect the accuracy of these assays!

And if YOU don't know why ask Jano.

 

[Dr JIM]

Its sad that there are "sides" i thought we were all in this together , for the same reasons. As long as we have "sides" this will ALWAYS be the outcome.

Wouldn't that be nice if MH arrived with an objective mindset instead of posting "These tests can't be accurate"
from the outset.

He did the EXACT same thing on the other TWO GH testing threads MANDS and I started, and that's his "REPUTATION" on Meso.

Don't believe me scroll thru his posts bc at LEAST 90-95% will involve GH testing!

So what "side" are you referring to bc to date in spite of all his and Janes objections they have yet to uncover ANYTHING wrong with these tests on an objective basis.

It's been nothing but accusations innuendo, deflection, distraction and detours. So why are they here?

To support PM GH sources! Why is THAT so important to them? That's the million dollar question but it's damn sure not to support some ill defined "cause".

Try what they are doing here on PM and see how long YOU LAST!

 

[Cpriest88]

Since this thread is going nowhere fast... and even an innocous post about the last report Mands posted gets buried under a heap pile of shit posts.... I'll join in on the fuckry..

Oh but my "unanswered posts" like the standard you didn't use for your "snot is ok" HPLCS, GTFOOH.

Speaking of standards that were purged or went missing... didn't the same exact thing occur in the old round of testing you performed Jim?

The standards were not posted bc THEY are not available, and why that's the case is not of your damn business.

Thanks for all those who were patient, but bc of certain logistical issues the standards were no longer available to use for comparison.

 

[Mr MASSE]

Is glycin if it's in the GH sample a problem?
Or a problem for the test process?
Is GH with a higher glycin level always a indicator of poor quality?

 

[Mr.B66]

Wouldn't that be nice if MH arrived with an objective mindset instead of posting "These tests can't be accurate"
from the outset.

He did the EXACT same thing on the other TWO GH testing threads MANDS and I started, and that's his "REPUTATION" on Meso.

Don't believe me scroll thru his posts bc at LEAST 90-95% will involve GH testing!

So what "side" are you referring to bc to date in spite of all his and Janes objections they have yet to uncover ANYTHING wrong with these tests on an objective basis.

It's been nothing but accusations innuendo, deflection, distraction and detours. So why are they here?

To support PM GH sources! Why is THAT so important to them? That's the million dollar question but it's damn sure not to support some ill defined "cause".

Try what they are doing here on PM and see how long YOU LAST!

First of all, i dont have even the slightest doubt in your test results. You said an accredited lab thats qualified to test HGH and performs these tests routinely did the testing , and thats good enough for me. Ive got no reason to doubt you Dr JIM, heck as far as im concerned, test results are in and thats that like um or not , these are the results.

When i refer to sides, im not talking about you and your beef with muscles or jano, thats way above my pay scale and quite honestly i dont understand any of the talk about HPLC OR AAA testing so i dont go there.
What im saying is there shouldn't be "sides" you know ,us vs them, PM vs meso.
I would hope we are all here with the same goal in mind. I see no reason to have "sides".

Carry on[emoji4]

 

[CdnGuy]

Its sad that there are "sides" i thought we were all in this together , for the same reasons. As long as we have "sides" this will ALWAYS be the outcome.

Agreed brother it is a shame but do you see any Meso members camped out at PM?

 

[muscle96ss]

Agreed brother it is a shame but do you see any Meso members camped out at PM?

Thats funnny, mands has friends over at PM and was just over there posting today.

Like Mr.B66 pointed out, we are one big community and need to work together no matter what boards we are on.

 

[CdnGuy]

Thats funnny, mands has friends over at PM and was just over there posting today.

Like Mr.B66 pointed out, we are one big community and need to work together no matter what boards we are on.

I'm sorry I didn't realize that I quoted you....wait I didn't so piss off please

 

[muscle96ss]

Since this thread is going nowhere fast... and even an innocous post about the last report Mands posted gets buried under a heap pile of shit posts.... I'll join in on the fuckry..



Speaking of standards that were purged or went missing... didn't the same exact thing occur in the old round of testing you performed Jim?

Hmmm, Jim you care to explain. This entire thread has been about you and your butt buddies criticizing PM and Jano about a standard(when Jano was contracted to do a immunoassay and not an HPLC). Yet as I explained earlier and Cpriest88 just confirmed; you wrote the book on not revealing a standard. In fact you claimed that I was so disruptive in your last testing endeavor, when the majority of the thread was me asking for the standard. How come we are held to different standards Jim(pun intended)? Why was it so unreasonable for me to ask for your standard in that thread and now all of the sudden because I didn't post a standard of a test that is not even the main focus, I am a fraud, liar, drug dealer, etc.. Please explain.