The Reason Donald Trump is Unfit for President

Picking up the slack from the embarrassing failure of Jimmy Carter.

We had hostages in Iran for 444 days and within hours of Regan's inauguration they were released.

Don't know what he said, don't know what he did, don't care.

We had hostages and Regan did what Carter could not do in over a year.

Regan cared about America and stood up for it.
Lol, that’s all you got?
Don’t forget the part about arming the Nicaraguan gorillas with money from Iran and while also being totally aware of the CIA’s covert missions in which the planes left here full of weapons and returned full of cocaine.
Lol, “SAY NO TO DRUGS” which was the the start of the crack epidemic. Coincidence I don’t think so!
 
Lol, as I often say, you can find stuff to support your views as well as I can.

Fuck, we could both be fools and they could all be the devil.

Either way, we don't agree but no hard feelings.
No doubt! This is just bullshit forum chatter.
I have friends and family members that don’t agree with my views but at the end of the day it’s love brother. This goes for all my Meso fam as well! :)
 
Last edited:
You're just as lacking in any understanding in this area as Eman.

Here's a test - instead of childish prattling with ad hominems, try formulating a few factual reasons why Reagan or Trump are "bad".

Let's see if you can handle that.

The reason why you will be unable to do so is what ails us the most in the US today - i.e. rational, thinking Democrats. The Dems in congress used to function, no longer. We used to have two parties with several factions in each, no longer. The Dems have purged (used intentionally) their party of nearly all dissidents that aren't as rabid as someone like Elisabeth Warren.

Media abandoning any objectivity is another major problem.

But give it a shot - try to formulate a handful of positions (of actual significance) as to why Reagan or Trump is "worst" (whatever that means).

PS/ sputtering about how you feel and throwing ad hominems on the bonfire isn't an argument, that's pointless. Also, you'll just prove my point if you do that.

The illusory superiority you display in your posts is profound. It's like I'm watching you digitally try to suck your own dick in front of me to prove something... It's really something.

Regardless, I already gave several points on both that you ignored. Trump and Reagan both have displayed countless anti libertarian views. Stop and frisk, drug policy, foreign policy, trade, anti first amendment views... The list goes on and on. You've indicated previously that libertarianism is an ideology you believe in, yet you want up wave the Trump, and now Reagan, flag.

Personally, I don't think you subscribe to libertarian beliefs at all. I think you just have a phobia of liberals lol... Liberals are something to be annoyed by sure, but you're legitimately frightened and you couldn't convince me otherwise.

If you doubt me on this, I encourage you to type liberals/liberal in the search bar and isolate your handle. There's about a dozen PAGES worth of posts of you expressing your butthurt about liberals... Likely in between more posts of your digital self fellatio.

Tell me more about my lack of understanding though... Make sure you insist the debate isn't worth your time since I'm just a liberal lol, let's see if we can get you up to 13 pages of liberal butthurt.
 
No doubt! This is just bullshit forum chatter.
I have friends and family members that agree with my views but at the end of the day it’s love brother. This goes for all my Meso fam as well! :)
Maybe one day well give each other shit over a beer, either way I will admit that at times I get caught up in this shit but at the end if the day it's just conversation.

I just hope whoever leads us does the best they can do.

Believe it or not I was all for Obama the first time out, the second time I was not so impressed.

We need a system that does not allow these parties to just stop everything with no improvements being made.

We need more than a 2 party system.
 
Conrad Black: Trump is already the most successful U.S. president since Ronald Reagan
Conrad Black

November 17, 2017 11:15 AM EST
Last Updated November 20, 2017 10:04 AM EST

It is distressing to read and listen to the nonsense in the Canadian media about Donald Trump. It is too early to predict whether he will be a successful president or not. But no one relying on the Canadian media would be aware that he has more than doubled the economic growth rate, reduced illegal immigration by about 80 per cent, withdrawn from the insane Paris Climate accord, helped add trillions to U.S. stock market values, created nearly two million new jobs, led the rout of ISIL, and gained full Chinese adherence to the unacceptability of North Korean nuclear military capability. He will probably pass the greatest tax cuts and reforms since Reagan, if not Lyndon Johnson, by Christmas, and may throw out the most unpopular feature of Obamacare, the coercive mandate, with it.

He can be a tiresome and implausible public figure at times, and the reservations widely held about him, in the United States and elsewhere, are understandable and not unfounded. He is, however, the most effective U.S. president since Reagan. In the 20 pre-Trump years, over $5 trillion and scores of thousands of American casualties were squandered in Middle East wars (while most Iraqis were handed over to Iranian influence), an immense humanitarian refugee tragedy was provoked, along with the greatest world economic crisis since the 1930s, American GDP per capita growth and capital investment shrunk by 75 per cent, the work force lost over 15 million people, millions of unskilled, illegal migrants were admitted, and the national debt of 233 years of American independence more than doubled in the last seven years of Obama. Those 20 years were the only time of absolute decline in American history, as well as a period of prolonged economic stagnation. Americans, unlike the older great nations of Europe and the Far East, have never experienced such setbacks and stagnation, and don’t like or accept them. It was in these circumstances that this unusual president was elected.

It is distressing to read and listen to the nonsense in the Canadian media about Donald Trump

In addition to these American problems, there is the international phenomenon of ever-widening disparity of wealth and income, with no obvious solution — taking money from people who have earned it and giving it to those who haven’t will just drive out the high economic achievers who provide most of the personal income tax revenue already. And there is the problem that, for the first time, higher technology produces unemployment rather than employment, and increased productivity, unlike in the Reagan years, has not, until Trump was elected, led to job creation.

In many advanced democratic countries, the political systems have begun to fragment. The German Social Democrats have half-disintegrated, the British Labour Party has been taken over by outright Marxists, France has practically obliterated its traditional parties except for the residue of the Gaullists, and in elections where only 30 per cent of eligible voters voted, the French handed the legislature to a party that was only invented, out of whole cloth, 15 months ago. The Austrian and Czech electorates have divided their support among a variety of parties and elevated, as France has, men in their thirties, who could be young nephews of Justin Trudeau. It was in these circumstances that Hillary Clinton narrowly kept her Democratic Party out of the hands of Senator Bernie Sanders and his socialist option, and Donald Trump, as he smashed the Bush-McCain-Romney tweedle-dee near-Democrats, also defeated the Ted Cruz far-right Republicans.

The Canadian media has almost uniformly bought into the line of the Trump-hating national U.S. media, that he is already a failed and probably illegitimate president. I was on CTV with my friend Evan Solomon about 10 days ago, and the preceding commentators claimed that “the noose is tightening around (Trump’s) neck,” and another said that it all “reminded (him) of Nixon,” as if Trump were about be convicted of “high crimes and misdemeanours.” The stupidest of these inescapable divinations of impeachable skullduggery I have seen is Scott Gilmore’s Maclean’s piece of Nov. 11, titled “Donald Trump; Putin’s Manchurian Idiot,” though he in fact excuses Trump from the charge of being a Manchurian candidate. Gilmore baldly states that there was heavy collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, though Trump, in his simplicity may not have known of it. The only person in American history elected president who has made billions of dollars and had never sought or held a public office, elected or otherwise, or a high military position, is dismissed as an imbecile who has no concept of what forces, treasonous as they obviously were, propelled him to his great office.

Canadians should recognize that a tawdry political charade is going on in the United States

One of Canada’s most eminent emeritus journalistic personalities approvingly just sent me a really insane piece from the droolingly Americophobic (U.K.) Guardian, fortunately on the verge of bankruptcy and reduced to a pitiful variation of crowd-funding, which asserts that Putin has manipulated the entire American political system for many years. This astounding surge of Russia to the status of a bogeyman greater than it ever enjoyed in the febrile ravings of Joseph R. McCarthy is piquant. Russia is an economic basketcase with a GDP smaller than Canada’s though it has more than four times our population. It is a geographically important country and a distinguished culture but has no durable political institutions, has never had a day of good government by Western standards, and could be bankrupted and swept out of the seas and skies of the world by the United States in a couple of weeks. The only danger it presents to America is that, if the Americans rebuff Russia too robustly, it will drive them into the arms of the Iranians and Chinese in a way that would be counter-productive to the U.S. national interest.

Canadians of all people should recognize that what is really going on in the United States is the tawdriest political charade in the country’s history. The Clinton campaign commissioned, through intermediaries, a dossier of salacious gossip and outright fabrications about Trump, from unidentified, unverifiable Kremlin sources, desperately shopped it to the U.S. media (remember the “Golden Shower” of Trump-synchronized urinating prostitutes in a Moscow hotel?), and managed to hand off the dossier to the FBI, politicizing that organization. Trump fired the FBI director, James Comey, who, in revenge, removed a government document, a much contested memo to himself about a conversation with the president, to force the appointment of a special counsel, who turned out to be none other than Comey’s chum and mentor and preceding FBI director, Robert Mueller.

Mueller is reduced to the usual fascistic shakedown of American prosecutors

Mueller has thrashed around with the Trump-collusion nonsense, which Obama launched a year ago, and which has not produced a shred of probative evidence of collusion. Mueller is reduced to the usual fascistic shakedown of American prosecutors: a pre-dawn Gestapo-style raid on Trump’s former campaign manager’s home (Paul Manafort), with armed men in his bedroom with his wife in sleeping attire (not uncommon for people sleeping at night in their own bedrooms), and then threw all the spaghetti at the wall — “conspiracy against the United States,” but for alleged financial activities years before Manafort knew Trump. It has emerged that this false dossier commissioned by the Clinton campaign is the only evidence there is of Trump-Kremlin collusion, all that is supposed to be “tightening a noose around (Trump’s) neck.” It is a stupendous farce confected by Kremlin low-lives for $10 million dollars paid over by the Clinton campaign, a partisan smear job. But you would ransack the Canadian media in vain to find it exposed as such, because they have all drunk the hand-me-down Kool Aid of the Never Trumpers and the anti-Trump Resistance. Canada’s media have almost totally failed in its coverage of the biggest political news in the world in many years.

Conrad Black: Trump is already the most successful U.S. president since Ronald Reagan
 
I am not a fan of our current president. He however is still the president of the USA, I hope he does well. I wouldn't want my plane to crash just because I disagree with the pilot.
We will find out how good of a president he is at the end of his run. It is still to early to say anything IMO. Democrats say he is doing horrible without much proof and Republicans are basically stroking his D... excuse the language but it's true. Give it time. Once his actions have enough time to catch up, we will deal with the repercussions of his actions. Good or bad.
As for him lifting no he is over weight and loves fast food.
 
People don't like Donald Trump because he's a white male in a position of power. Let's just be honest and call it for what it is at this point.
It's not a race thing... at least not in my eyes. All of our presidents except for one have been white. I hope you are being sarcastic. Plus all of the presidential runners were white.
I don't like him for other reasons.
 
If you believe that Trump is a genius, you're dumber then he is.



How about a tax bill that he has zero clue about? Have fun with that, the epitome of campaign lies. He'd sign anything that walking corpse McConnell put in front of him.
Dumb how?

Becoming a self-made billionaire (sure he inherited like $20M, but still)
got like 3 trophy wives, and lots of hot one-nighters you'd kill to MARRY to
becoming president against all odds
insipiring @master.on
... and so on

As for the tax cut
capitalist America had higher corporate taxes than comunist/socialist Europe?
 
As for the tax cut
capitalist America had higher corporate taxes than comunist/socialist Europe?

What's your point? That we should pay less corporate tax than Slovakia? Brilliant. How many times did Trump tell you/lie to you that we had the highest tax rates in the world? The fact he made the comparison at all shows how moronic he is.

Becoming a self-made billionaire (sure he inherited like $20M, but still)

He's a self made billionaire that inherited money, huh? Cool story.

got like 3 trophy wives

Ivana Trump is a trophy wife to you? You may need to get your vision checked. Melania is closer to a trophy wife, although that bitch most definitely has some screws loose... I don't know if she's constantly holding in a shit or if she was just born with bitch face.

Dumb how?

He's dumb like you are dumb, master.on. His presence is the equivalent to yours on this forum... Post stupid shit that no one really cares about... Make people wonder if you're a troll or mentally challenged. I still can't decide... 50/50 split is likely.
 
This thread proves that when people are profoundly ignorant/stupid, they are per definition incapable of assessing their own level of ignorance/stupidity.

In other areas of life, these people would probably have the good sense to shut up if they were faced with a complex situation requiring deep expertise. But in politics, these fools have no qualms about spouting all sorts of nonsense, and with no attempts at constructing a reasoned position. Nope, just digging into invectives is sufficient to make a winning point - to them.

There really ought to be a "voter's license" - the Dems would probably suffer 90% voter roll losses. Republicans would take a hit too, but nothing like the emotional train wrecks on the left.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top