The Reason Donald Trump is Unfit for President

Is that it?
All the "Russia-collusion", an "unprecendented attack on democracy" was just a bunch of trolls posting comments in social media?

Will that even hold in court?
What prevents trolls from saying they were just exercising their freedom of speech online (which they can), even if they ain't American citizens?
 
“BREAKING: President Trump directs Justice Department to ban gun modifications like bump stocks used in Las Vegas massacre.”

[emoji1304]


looks like Trumps another phony 2A supporter.
 
“BREAKING: President Trump directs Justice Department to ban gun modifications like bump stocks used in Las Vegas massacre.”

[emoji1304]

looks like Trumps another phony 2A supporter.

Banning those "bump" stocks are silly - how about a sloppy grip, is that banned too?

Time to do away with the 1934 NFA Act and it's successors, as well as the ATF.
 
Bolton, really!? He even makes McCain look like a peace nik. This won't end well..
 
Is that a quote or just your projection?

Irrelevant in any case, it is what it is. That's settled as a near unanimous bipartisan activity so let's move on, shall we?

"I still think the decision to overthrow Saddam was correct..." - Bolton, May 2015

He's said the same thing multiple times since then, I'm just too lazy to look for them.

If Bolton has any say in foreign policy, the US will attack both NK and Iran, and that's just for starters. Is that what you mean by move on?
 


Wow, I can't recall Tucker Carlson being an asshole of such proportions in any other interview that I've seen. That interview is an interesting view of what media would be like if it weren't liberal but still as hellbent on shoving opinions down the viewer's throat.

Anyway, you're making two big mistakes - a) reductio ad absurdum by distilling Bolton's statements the way you did and b) forgetting that he isn't his own man, he speaks as part of the administration.

Note Bolton's qualified comments about how the campaigns under Bush were successful (and you're welcome to think that we shouldn't have gone there, but take a look at Congress' near unanimous support at the time) but Obama (Hillary?) subsequently squandered the whole thing and threw the Iraqis under the bus.
 
By move on I mean that it's time to not argue the case whether or not we should have kicked out Saddam. That's boooooooooring.

Right, not many innocent lives left to ruin in Iraq. Much more exciting to invade new places and destroy innocent lives there.
 
Right, not many innocent lives left to ruin in Iraq. Much more exciting to invade new places and destroy innocent lives there.

It's history book stuff now - oughta, coulda, shoulda, blah blah blah. Deal with it. What's worse is how Obama abandoned the effort - we've seen the consequences of that. And that puts us into the present again.

Go find an alternate universe where your preferred version of history is reality. ;-)
 
Wow, I can't recall Tucker Carlson being an asshole of such proportions in any other interview that I've seen. That interview is an interesting view of what media would be like if it weren't liberal but still as hellbent on shoving opinions down the viewer's throat.

Anyway, you're making two big mistakes - a) reductio ad absurdum by distilling Bolton's statements the way you did and b) forgetting that he isn't his own man, he speaks as part of the administration.

Note Bolton's qualified comments about how the campaigns under Bush were successful (and you're welcome to think that we shouldn't have gone there, but take a look at Congress' near unanimous support at the time) but Obama (Hillary?) subsequently squandered the whole thing and threw the Iraqis under the bus.

do you think the Iraq war was a good idea? the whole premise of it was to get rid of Saddam’s WMDs which he had none of and you still think it was a good idea? that was the only reason we went in there and he didn’t even have them talk about total fuck up,
 
do you think the Iraq war was a good idea? the whole premise of it was to get rid of Saddam’s WMDs which he had none of and you still think it was a good idea? that was the only reason we went in there and he didn’t even have them talk about total fuck up,

Not only did he not have them, but the "evidence" he did have them being breathlessly pushed by the media 24/7 was as transparently fake as the Russian Collusion stories being played out today. I would think one would want to learn from such history instead of forget about it and call it boring.
 
It's history book stuff now - oughta, coulda, shoulda, blah blah blah. Deal with it. What's worse is how Obama abandoned the effort - we've seen the consequences of that. And that puts us into the present again.

Go find an alternate universe where your preferred version of history is reality. ;-)

My version of history w.r.t. John Bolton is easy to prove. I don't know of any media head or politician who wouldn't agree Bolton is a bigger war monger than insane (by your account) McCain. What's funny is your initial attempt to deny it, then later to justify it.

Your unquestioning support for every Trump decision is touching, and I'm sure he appreciates your efforts at defending him. The rest of us have to wonder why Trump placed a mad dog in such an important position. Until the bombs start falling on Tehran or Pyongyang, I guess we will all be left guessing. However, I wonder even more how his supporters will feel if millions end up dying as a result.
 
do you think the Iraq war was a good idea? the whole premise of it was to get rid of Saddam’s WMDs which he had none of and you still think it was a good idea? that was the only reason we went in there and he didn’t even have them talk about total fuck up,

No point in living in the past.

Congress voted nearly unanimously in favor of it, just give it a rest.

You're sounding like Hillary and her denial of history. It is what it is.
 
My version of history w.r.t. John Bolton is easy to prove. I don't know of any media head or politician who wouldn't agree Bolton is a bigger war monger than insane (by your account) McCain. What's funny is your initial attempt to deny it, then later to justify it.

Your unquestioning support for every Trump decision is touching, and I'm sure he appreciates your efforts at defending him. The rest of us have to wonder why Trump placed a mad dog in such an important position. Until the bombs start falling on Tehran or Pyongyang, I guess we will all be left guessing. However, I wonder even more how his supporters will feel if millions end up dying as a result.

Not following your logic. I'm always consistent.

I'm not exactly a Trump supporter as much as I'm opposed to the far greater idiots who ran against him.
 

Sponsors

Back
Top