Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like I said, I'm not talking about instances of violence. I'm talking about a party that endorses the groups that cause the violence. I'm talking about riots and mobs not single instances.
Liberal jihadIst out there burning cars, causing and inflicting violence, marching in the streets and stopping traffic, shutting down businesses, etc, etc. You wouldn't see the other side attempting to destroy the nation because they didn't get their way. Liberals have declared jihad against America.
There will be instances like this on all sides. Difference is... your side endorses it.
I can point out a mob of black lives matter protesters chanting kill cops especially the white ones and then black lives matter people actually kill cops and you come back with a guy walking into a church shooting people.Not the same.
I can point out instances where the Democrat leaders including the president defending and clearly siding with said organizations and you can come back with white racist guy voted republican. I'm not moving the goal post. Your putting a net in front of it when it's my turn to kick a field goal.
First-Trump isnt keeping his promises huh? Lets consider the facts shall we. he's faced more opposition from the alt left, dnc and media who have created so many roadblocks the guy cant even get a cabinet together in a timely manner. He cant even take a shit without someone criticizing the type of toilet paper he uses. Every single cabinet pick, every member of his team has their entire life personal and professional picked apart by the same political entity who then complains when he cant "keep his promises." So, they intentionally create the roadblocks, then complain when he doesn't get through them fast enough.
Every bit of your post is wrong.You're changing your story yet again. What is this now, the third time?
Please tell me where in the following quotes of yours you mentioned party leaders or party endorsement?
Once again, you went from one side never doing any destruction to America. Then you changed the story to both sides do it but only one side endorses it. Now on the third iteration it's party endorsement that pertains to only riots and mobs and not single instances.....
This is pretty funny since now you want to claim that the liberal left party endorses violence but I guess black lives matter being the liberal party is news to me...
I can also point out a mob of white supremacists chanting to "kill the negroes" and then white supremacist people actually kill black people...
I can point out where white guys murdered an undocumented immigrant after the election and Tru p openly stating "maybe they should have just rouged him up". How's that for an endorsement for you
I can point out instances where Trump defends and clearly sides with the same but go ahead and keep grasping at straws